Predictions for Sunday- non Troll version

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
cleg
cleg
cleg
Posts: 2649
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Deep in the Heart of Giants Territory

Post by cleg »

Redskins 35 Giants 10. The Redskins will make a statement with this game that they are not to be taken lightly and that they are legit contenders for the NFC East (with a few breaks). Book it...
Drinking the Kool-Aid again...
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

I don't think we're legit contenders yet but ....

I do think a lot of teams are going to be generally surprised at the difference in intensity they will see we now are playing with

I'm looking forward to seeing more progress here

this first game is going to show some teams that this franchise is no longer going to quit playing hard after the first 3 quarters :D
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
redskinz4ever
******
******
Posts: 2630
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 3:55 pm
Location: charlotte nc

Post by redskinz4ever »

20 - 13 SKINS WIN HTTR
TOUCHDOWN .....WASHINGTON REDSKINS !!!!
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

I think our WR's can exploit the Gnats secondary. I just hope Rex can get them the ball. I also expect out D-line to control the LOS. 24-13 Skins.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
Manchester_Redskin
Hog
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 9:00 am
Location: Ex-Brit now living in Thailand

Post by Manchester_Redskin »

Dont rate the Giants this season, reckon they will be the basement boys so put me down for a skins win. Dont care by how many.

Hightower wasa good pickup for us I think
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

HarleyHog wrote:God I wish they would add an /ignore feature to filter Trolls out


Maybe someday, if this internets thingy gets popular... but, don't hold your breath.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
HarleyHog
Hog
Posts: 410
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 4:55 am
Location: Vallejo, California

Post by HarleyHog »

HarleyHog wrote:TROLL, TROLL, GO AWAY,
COME AGAIN, WELL, ACTUALLY,
JUST GO AWAY.

how much more clear can it be made?
I'm sick of your defeatist crap.
I don't CARE if Luck is Jesus in cleats, nobody who cares about this team wants us to get him your way. YOU(r posts) suck, not this team, and I'm sick of your 'oh so clever' catch phrase. At least have the decency to allow threads which specifically indicate they are not looking for your response to be only for fans.
Everybody funny, now you funny too ...

"The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have." -Vince Lombardi

(BTW . . . we have RGIII now)
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

HarleyHog wrote:
HarleyHog wrote:TROLL, TROLL, GO AWAY,
COME AGAIN, WELL, ACTUALLY,
JUST GO AWAY.

how much more clear can it be made?
I'm sick of your defeatist crap.
I don't CARE if Luck is Jesus in cleats, nobody who cares about this team wants us to get him your way. YOU(r posts) suck, not this team, and I'm sick of your 'oh so clever' catch phrase. At least have the decency to allow threads which specifically indicate they are not looking for your response to be only for fans.
:up:
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
InsaneBoost
Hog
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:14 am
Location: Washington D.C

Post by InsaneBoost »

Just don't see how someone can want their team to suck that bad, tank, etc, all for one player who has NEVER played a down in the NFL, for all we know he could be the biggest bust in NFL history. Someone did a comparison between not top 10 and top 10 QB's I believe. If memory serves me correctly, the not top 10 QB's / first rounders were better.


Anyways, with that said, I think the Giants aren't the team they use to be, they've slowly been deteriorating over the last couple of years, hence their second half of the season failures.

They still are a competitive team, don't get me wrong, but I think they are just getting older (injuries are showing it) and are losing players left and right. The Redskins on the opposite are younger, have a coach planting a system in that works with the players he has and a defense that is more hard hitting. They make you think twice about catching the ball around them.

Anyways, I think our new o line is the answer the the game. Might not be new new, but it certainly did its job last season against the Giants that second game. Grossman put up 300+ on them then, now we have better RB's and receivers. Just don't see the Giants winning.

Still going to be close, 24-17 Redskins, maybe a little bigger, but nothing huge.

Ready for Week 1!!!!!
Redskins | Capitals | Nationals | Wizards | D.C United | UMD
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
**LPJ**
Posts: 6714
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
Contact:

Post by langleyparkjoe »

InsaneBoost wrote:Just don't see how someone can want their team to suck that bad, tank, etc, all for one player who has NEVER played a down in the NFL, for all we know he could be the biggest bust in NFL history. Someone did a comparison between not top 10 and top 10 QB's I believe. If memory serves me correctly, the not top 10 QB's / first rounders were better.


Anyways, with that said, I think the Giants aren't the team they use to be, they've slowly been deteriorating over the last couple of years, hence their second half of the season failures.

They still are a competitive team, don't get me wrong, but I think they are just getting older (injuries are showing it) and are losing players left and right. The Redskins on the opposite are younger, have a coach planting a system in that works with the players he has and a defense that is more hard hitting. They make you think twice about catching the ball around them.

Anyways, I think our new o line is the answer the the game. Might not be new new, but it certainly did its job last season against the Giants that second game. Grossman put up 300+ on them then, now we have better RB's and receivers. Just don't see the Giants winning.

Still going to be close, 24-17 Redskins, maybe a little bigger, but nothing huge.

Ready for Week 1!!!!!


Lots of good points in there.
Bring on them ny bamaz, we ready!
Hog Bowl Champions
'09 & '17 langleyparkjoe, '10 Cappster, '11 & '13 DarthMonk,
'12 Deadskins, '14 PickSixerTWSS, '15 APEX PREDATOR, '16 vwoodzpusha
Scottskins
########
########
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 1:54 am
Location: The other Washington

Post by Scottskins »

skins 28-13 hightower is going to run all over the giants and he'll get lots of screens too. giants just lost a starting LB for the season to go along with all the db losses...and osi isn't playing. the score could be even bigger =)
Death to the EGO! RIP 21
User avatar
jeremyroyce
Hog
Posts: 1351
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 6:27 pm

Post by jeremyroyce »

Hey, I wanted to ask, USA Today had some writers that normally make their predictions for the weekends games every year. I can't find it anywhere on their site, does anybody know if they still have a section for predictions ?
User avatar
fabe
Hog
Posts: 1123
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:09 pm
Location: Brentwood, MD.

Post by fabe »

The Swami predicted 19-20 Giants. He either thinking safety or Gano connecting 4-4. Me on the other hand predict 17-20 Skins.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

fabe wrote:The Swami predicted 19-20 Giants. He is either thinking safety or Gano connecting 4-4. Me on the other hand predict 17-20 Skins.

There are a lot of fans here that have better records of predicting winners and loser than "The Swami" over the past 5 years

Actually MUCH better records over that time frame :lol:

ALL of those predictors this week are predicting a Redskins' win

whose "opinion" do you 'trust'? - a proven loser or a bunch of proven 'winners' :wink:
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
gushogs
Hog
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 8:57 pm
Location: Panama

Post by gushogs »

It's been said before but, JUST WIN BABY!!!!! Go Skins.

HaiL,
FEDUP!
User avatar
fabe
Hog
Posts: 1123
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:09 pm
Location: Brentwood, MD.

Post by fabe »

SkinsJock wrote:
fabe wrote:The Swami predicted 19-20 Giants. He is either thinking safety or Gano connecting 4-4. Me on the other hand predict 17-20 Skins.

There are a lot of fans here that have better records of predicting winners and loser than "The Swami" over the past 5 years

Actually MUCH better records over that time frame :lol:

ALL of those predictors this week are predicting a Redskins' win

whose "opinion" do you 'trust'? - a proven loser or a bunch of proven 'winners' :wink:


I trust very few predictions when it comes to football games because the game is so unpredictable. You can do all the research in the world but all it takes is one person to hit the ball carrier in a certain way, he drops the ball, and that's game. I personally can always find ways for a Redskins win, but I figured I'd share what the "experts" are saying about the game. This is, however, one man's word out of the 20-30 different analysts you can find on ESPN.
BossHog
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9375
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:34 am
Location: London, Ontario
Contact:

Post by BossHog »

27-20 Skins. Not as close as it sounds... G-men get a cheapie late when we're in prevent. We dominate the trenches and control the clock for 35 minutes.

The Giants may have our number the past few years, but they're ripe for the picking with all of their injuries. Eli lost his trusty center, whom he counted on for help, and he'll be staring at a guy who has been practicing with him for years (Cofield). It will be a very different dynamic for BOTH teams in this match-up.

We're coming out on top baby.
Sean Taylor was one of a kind, may he rest in peace.
User avatar
Bigpoker
newbie
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 2:50 pm

Post by Bigpoker »

Skins win....27 -17 Gooooooo!!!!Skins......!!!!!
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Post by Irn-Bru »

RedskinsRule56 wrote:Giants have won 7 in a row and 9 of 10 versus the Redskins and you guys are all not only picking the Redskins to win but saying they will win by 2 scores. Do you all honestly think the Redskins will score over that many points? Most of you have us scoring over 20 points in this game. Why is no one on this board realistic?


It's just amazing how prophetic this guy is. You can just about taste the irony of the self-proclaimed "realistic" prognostication. :lol:
Last edited by Irn-Bru on Sun Sep 11, 2011 9:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

Irn-Bru wrote:
RedskinsRule56 wrote:Giants have won 7 in a row and 9 of 10 versus the Redskins and you guys are all not only picking the Redskins to win but saying they will win by 2 scores. Do you all honestly think the Redskins will score over that many points? Most of you have us scoring over 20 points in this game. [b]Why is no one on this board realistic?]/b]


It's just amazing how prophetic this guy is. You can just about taste the irony of the self-proclaimed "realistic" prognostication. :lol:


+1
SprintRightOption
Hog
Posts: 260
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:54 pm

Post by SprintRightOption »

Irn-Bru wrote:
RedskinsRule56 wrote:Giants have won 7 in a row and 9 of 10 versus the Redskins and you guys are all not only picking the Redskins to win but saying they will win by 2 scores. Do you all honestly think the Redskins will score over that many points? Most of you have us scoring over 20 points in this game. Why is no one on this board realistic?


It's just amazing how prophetic this guy is. You can just about taste the irony of the self-proclaimed "realistic" prognostication. :lol:


He must be a weather forecaster in real life. He looks at all the computer models but never actually looks outside his window. They said there was a good chance of a thunderstorm at the Game today. They were right. The Redskins defense rained on the Giants Parade and his prediction.
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

CanesSkins26 wrote:
Deadskins wrote:I would absolutely love for this team to show it can put a lesser opponent away and not have it go down to the wire every week. We've been the cardiac kids for too many years now.


I don't think that's a fair expectation against the Giants, though, because they aren't a lesser opponent. They were 10-6 last year and beat us twice. I can understand that sentiment when we play the Panthers and Bills, but certainly not the Giants. Have we closed the gap on them? I think so. Are they a "lesser opponent"? Not at all.

Yes, today they were lesser opponent, and we put them away. I loved it. It was especially nice, because a bunch of G-strings fans crashed our Redskins bar here in Atlanta. They were crying half way through the 3rd quarter. :twisted:
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

SprintRightOption wrote:
Irn-Bru wrote:
RedskinsRule56 wrote:Giants have won 7 in a row and 9 of 10 versus the Redskins and you guys are all not only picking the Redskins to win but saying they will win by 2 scores. Do you all honestly think the Redskins will score over that many points? Most of you have us scoring over 20 points in this game. Why is no one on this board realistic?


It's just amazing how prophetic this guy is. You can just about taste the irony of the self-proclaimed "realistic" prognostication. :lol:


He must be a weather forecaster in real life. He looks at all the computer models but never actually looks outside his window. They said there was a good chance of a thunderstorm at the Game today. They were right. The Redskins defense rained on the Giants Parade and his prediction.



IF he has a real life :evil:
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

fabe wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:
fabe wrote:The Swami predicted 19-20 Giants. He is either thinking safety or Gano connecting 4-4. Me on the other hand predict 17-20 Skins.

There are a lot of fans here that have better records of predicting winners and losers than "The Swami" over the past 5 years


I trust very few predictions when it comes to football games because the game is so unpredictable. You can do all the research in the world but all it takes is one person to hit the ball carrier in a certain way, he drops the ball, and that's game. I personally can always find ways for a Redskins win, but I figured I'd share what the "experts" are saying about the game. This is, however, one man's word out of the 20-30 different analysts you can find on ESPN.


no worries - I was just making the point that there is NO analyst at ESPN that has as good a 'record' at predicting NFL games as the middle of the order Hognosticators at TheHogs.net

NOT ONE ANALYST - that's pretty amazing, don't you think? :shock:

THIS is where you go for the best NFL 'analysts' http://www.the-hogs.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=36804
and we do it for fun - you should give it a try :lol:
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Post Reply