For those who want Moss...

JPFair · Post by **JPFair** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:13 pm

Personally, I don't want Moss on the Redskins. If Gibbs wanted him on the team, then I want him on the team.

That being said, before we even THINK about getting him, Joe Gibbs would first have to consult with Patrick Ramsey. A Wide Receiver is only as good as the dude throwing him the ball. A chemistry must be developed. We would have to see if Ramsey and Moss could gel.

patjam77 · Post by **patjam77** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:16 pm

i know that the chances of the skins getting mos are slim, it's fun to debate this topic. we all love the skins and if they did get him and he help the redskins win it all he would be a god. if he made things worse we would hate him. it's a crap shoot.

Redskins Rule · Post by **Redskins Rule** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:28 pm

I don't want Randy because there are other options out there. Randy could be a cancer in our lockeroom. Coach Gibbs has spent his first year cutting the cancer in our lockeroom and building up the team with "core redskins".

Randy could very well not be a cancer in the locker room. Gibbs could sqaure him away. Some of you that want Randy are thinking that Gibbs will square him away. Personally, I don't know why you would want to take that chance when you have other wide recievers you can get, who definetly won't be a cancer in the locker room.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:53 pm

Im 20 and like I said in a previous thread Im torn. I like his talent but not his ways, so I guess thats a no.

I don't want Moss here.

SkinsChic · Post by **SkinsChic** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:08 pm

We have other options at WR - we just need to get him on the field....and if Coles gets "well" and we get rid of Gardner and use Thrash and Jacobs...I think we're okay. No..they may not be Randy Moss...but they can be good (maybe even great - given the chance) without all the BS that goes with Moss (or TO for that matter)

John Manfreda · Post by **John Manfreda** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:47 pm

I think that attacking Jake on this is ridiculous, he is just trying to get a survey so he can confirm or disspose his theory. I am 22 and I would say no.

Sanjoso · Post by **Sanjoso** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 5:49 pm

I am 15 years old and I would hate it if Randy was on the Redskins. He might have talent, but everyone here has to admit he is full of himself and a jerk.

Scooter · Post by **Scooter** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:02 pm

I'm 40 - don't want Moss on my team, just like I didn't want Dijon Sanders. It's not much of an issue considering Gibbs and his "character counts" theory of putting a team together. A player must have character, not BE a character.

Hogfather · Post by **Hogfather** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:14 pm

I'm 29 and I would hate to see Moss in Washington. I can see the pros but the cons just out way them.

dnpmakkah · Post by **dnpmakkah** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:14 pm

Im 25 and I would take Moss on my team. He is better than Coles, Gardner, Thrash, Jacobs and McCants. He would make our team much better....thats assuming he plays like he has so far.

Gardner needs to go he is not consistant, I like Thrash and Jacobs isnt costing us much plus he's good on special teams. Coles is awesome and would be even more so if Moss was on the other side of him. I also think we should get rid of McCants. Everyone is complaining that Moss isnt a Gibbs type of player, well of McCants was a Gibbs type of player then he would of been on the field more. So trade him for a pick IF you arent going to use him right?

But thats off topic, I can see how Moss and his attitude can be a cancer on this team but I can also see Sean Taylor pulling some of the same stunts in a few years and Clinton Portis might too....they seem to be from the same mentality. Both of those guys are flashy too but as long as they help us win and the teammates like them then all is good.

Redskins4Life · Post by **Redskins4Life** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 7:51 pm

Depending on who we would have to give up for Moss (maybe Smoot via sign and trade??), Moss could make us instant contenders. Assuming we dont give up any offensive players we would have Ramsey, Portis, Coles, Moss, and Cool

ey who I am expecting to have a Jason Witten like season. Our offense could be potentially deadly, and our defense is already sharp. Moss would be a great addition.

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 8:03 pm

I'm an old fool at 60! I think Moss is a great receiver but I do not want him on our team.

I agree with Terri in that we are going to be very good with the receivers we have because of the improved line blocking, the better game planning and overall scheme (we may even go shotgun!!!) and the players are going to improve.

I guess my point is that even if we had Moss last season the QBs were not going to get the ball to him the way we were playing and it would have been ugly with an unhappy, spoilt child!

Now next year, this offense is going to improve - you can take that to the bank too, Terri! The players (and we may add a receiver but NOT Moss) are going to be given a better game plan and blocking scheme and IMO Coles, D Mac, Jacobs and Thrash (in no order, plus whoever) are going to have very good years.

We don't need a great receiver we need a great system and these guys we have - they are going to step up.

Super Bowls are won by better teams not better players.

washington53 · Post by **washington53** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 8:11 pm

I'm 14
Moss has been playing for 7 years now and his attitude hasn't changed at all. He is a good player, but Joe will not want someone like that on his team. i wouldn't want him on my team. I thought T.O. was full of himself, but Moss blew right passed him

hailskins666 · Post by **hailskins666** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:15 pm

27. moss wasn't even in the media this year until the playoffs.

who better to give the skins a deep threat?

regardless of the portis trade, i remember a lot of pepole who didn't want corey dillon last offseason, because he was a "cancer". how much of a "cancer" has he been this year under a good coach? not a peep, squeal or even one "me". My 2 cents

Redskins2k5 · Post by **Redskins2k5** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:23 pm

hailskins666 wrote:27. moss wasn't even in the media this year until the playoffs.

who better to give the skins a deep threat?

regardless of the portis trade, i remember a lot of pepole who didn't want corey dillon last offseason, because he was a "cancer". how much of a "cancer" has he been this year under a good coach? not a peep, squeal or even one "me".

You are totally correct.

Redskin Don · Post by **Redskin Don** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:36 pm

Moss is an animal and has proven that he's not a team player. Jeff George is another guy who comes to mind who had all the talent in the world, but he was a cancer in the locker room and on the sideline. We don't need to have to babysit another prima donna big mouth.

I'm 43 yo by the way.

hailskins666 · Post by **hailskins666** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:44 pm

Redskin Don wrote:Moss is an animal and has proven that he's not a team player. Jeff George is another guy who comes to mind who had all the talent in the world, but he was a cancer in the locker room and on the sideline. We don't need to have to babysit another prima donna big mouth.

I'm 43 yo by the way.

jeff geoge? talent? as compared to moss? george wasn't even a top 10 qb at best, moss is a top 3 WR at worst.
oh, you must mean george's talent to throw the retard int at the worst possible moment.

not a good comparison.

Hogfather · Post by **Hogfather** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:51 pm

Go easy on George, he was a Redskin once....God I hate the fact I can even remember that. If I only had that flash thing from Men in Black, the things I could choose to forget.

redskincity · Post by **redskincity** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 9:57 pm

hailskins666 wrote:27. moss wasn't even in the media this year until the playoffs.

who better to give the skins a deep threat?

regardless of the portis trade, i remember a lot of pepole who didn't want corey dillon last offseason, because he was a "cancer". how much of a "cancer" has he been this year under a good coach? not a peep, squeal or even one "me".

I couldnt agree more.

I would just love to see a link where it says Moss is a cancer in the locker room.

If anything he is a cancer to their defense because the O is clicking.

Please Moss bring some of that so called 'Cancer to our locker room, we need it. :idea:

hailskins666 · Post by **hailskins666** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:15 pm

Please Moss bring some of that so called 'Cancer to our locker room, we need it.

i don't know if i'd go as far as to say that. i think the better term would be, "bring some of that talent to the field"

redskincity · Post by **redskincity** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:25 pm

hailskins666 wrote:
Please Moss bring some of that so called 'Cancer to our locker room, we need it.
i don't know if i'd go as far as to say that. i think the better term would be, "bring some of that talent to the field"

Yeah. I typed too far.

What I meant is, this Offense needs swagger. CP had it at first but.......after 6000 rushing attempts it all went away.

Gibbs4Life · Post by **Gibbs4Life** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:37 pm

Whether or not you want Moss, you cannot dispute his talent/ability, he's better than our top 3 COMBINED!!!! So any moron who wants to say only kids want "flashy, playmakers" is football illiterate. All GM's want playmakers, granted attitude is a factor but I THINK WE CAN ALL AGREE WE HAVE A COACH WHO IS A QUALIFIED JUDGE, Gibbs had guys with excentric behavior before and brought the best out of them are you saying he couldn't do it with 84? c'mon. Hell Ray Lewis killed somebody and all you people would take him! All this Moss talk has to do with winning football games and that's the botton line, either we get Moss or someone who is that caliber of a player (and they're aren't many) or we're doomed to field 50/50 or roll the dice on a #1 pick WR (can you say westbrook ne one). Redskins are idiots not to want Moss if they have a shot.

Smithian · Post by **Smithian** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:38 pm

I wouldn't take Ray Lewis...

Redskin Don · Post by **Redskin Don** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:43 pm

we just don't need his kind of "talent".

"There is no I in TEAM"

hailskins666 · Post by **hailskins666** » Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:56 pm

Smithian wrote:I wouldn't take Ray Lewis...

DUDE????????????

Redskin Don wrote:we just don't need his kind of "talent".

"There is no I in TEAM"

no, but there is a "me".

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

For those who want Moss...

not much I can add that hasn't already been said...

Re: not much I can add that hasn't already been said...

Never said Moss didn't have talent...