grade our WIDEOUT's & T.E.'s
-
- ******
- Posts: 2630
- youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
- Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 3:55 pm
- Location: charlotte nc
grade our WIDEOUT's & T.E.'s
the first half very solid, second half where did they go ?? there for i give them a grade of C.
TOUCHDOWN .....WASHINGTON REDSKINS !!!!
The receivers didn't have a great game but it was solid for the most part. The did not have deep balls caught or long yardage but that could be a combination of Brunnel and his lack of arm strenght as of now or Tampa playing deeper in the secondary not to sure though.
Coles was fine he caught everything that came his way the only problem is that he wasnt thrown to much and that was probably because Tampa focused on him more than the others.
Taylor didnt play and I dont think Thrash had any thrown to him, which brings me to Gardner. As usual he drops important balls and easy catches which is a big no no, I don't like that unreliability.
Overall I'd give them a high C and thats only because they won. We could do much better which im sure we will.
ey caught everything his way and had an awesome catch but for the most part TE/Halfbacks ususally block in this system and since there was no sacks and Portis had a good game I would give them an A.
Coles was fine he caught everything that came his way the only problem is that he wasnt thrown to much and that was probably because Tampa focused on him more than the others.
Taylor didnt play and I dont think Thrash had any thrown to him, which brings me to Gardner. As usual he drops important balls and easy catches which is a big no no, I don't like that unreliability.
Overall I'd give them a high C and thats only because they won. We could do much better which im sure we will.

-
- Hog
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:30 pm