grade our WIDEOUT's & T.E.'s

Washington Football Game Day discussions for 2003, 2004, and 2005
Locked
redskinz4ever
******
******
Posts: 2630
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 3:55 pm
Location: charlotte nc

grade our WIDEOUT's & T.E.'s

Post by redskinz4ever »

the first half very solid, second half where did they go ?? there for i give them a grade of C.
TOUCHDOWN .....WASHINGTON REDSKINS !!!!
User avatar
dnpmakkah
Hog
Posts: 1353
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 2:49 am
Location: Fairfax, VA

Post by dnpmakkah »

The receivers didn't have a great game but it was solid for the most part. The did not have deep balls caught or long yardage but that could be a combination of Brunnel and his lack of arm strenght as of now or Tampa playing deeper in the secondary not to sure though.

Coles was fine he caught everything that came his way the only problem is that he wasnt thrown to much and that was probably because Tampa focused on him more than the others.

Taylor didnt play and I dont think Thrash had any thrown to him, which brings me to Gardner. As usual he drops important balls and easy catches which is a big no no, I don't like that unreliability.

Overall I'd give them a high C and thats only because they won. We could do much better which im sure we will.

Cooley caught everything his way and had an awesome catch but for the most part TE/Halfbacks ususally block in this system and since there was no sacks and Portis had a good game I would give them an A.
gregory smith
Hog
Posts: 458
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 2:30 pm

Post by gregory smith »

I agreee that Rod's production Sunday had a lot to do with the Buc's focus on Coles, but overall the wr production was probably more a result of our conservative gameplan.
Locked