Champsturf wrote:You have GOT to be kidding me??? What the hell is Ramsey going to learn behind Brunell??
That dink and dunks don't make first downs??? This argument is ludicrous.
Yes... he learns Brunells Pros and Cons.... Just like you would learn watching someone play chess.... But you wouldn't be getting your kester kicked doing it...
Champsturf wrote:Ramsey should be in there. If nothing else, than for a spark. He showed a spark in the Giants game, just too bad he threw 3 pics.
Yes... you'd be the same guy after losing 4 games Ramsey starts, that would be screaming for Hasselbeck, then Hamden, etc... I know your type... fickle.... 3 pics is a spark

Champsturf wrote:Ramsey has a better connection with Coles than Brunell by far. That alone would makes defenses a little less likely to stack 8 and 9 in the box.
Actually, that would probably just make them double up on Coles.... To get the 8 out of the box, we would need to actually complete passes... something that's not all Brunell fault because he's not the one dropping them... I do recall the wideouts dropping Ramsey's balls too...no pun intended...
Champsturf wrote:And to say our O-line needs to do better???? Again you all are on crack.
9 sacks, and 369 yards in 4 games for our top RB.... and we're the one's on crack?

Champsturf wrote:They may not be run blocking well, but Brunell has had ALL day to throw the ball, especially against Cleveland. I was there and know that for fact.
Oh my god! A Pro NFL Scout amongst us... who could have imagined that..

Champsturf wrote:The only problem I saw was that Brunell STARES at his intended target. EVERY time. Ramsey may double clutch and hold onto the ball too long, but that can be changed. I seem to remember a saying though...you can't teach an OLD dog new tricks.
(your example is mocking your saying.... you might want to edit that...

)