^Article he wrote last year in October.
This is what he said in a Bleacher Report article after the Packers game:
“Kirk Cousins had a solid game against the Packers. It was like Marcus Mariota's game against Green Bay the previous week where Mariota didn't have to do anything particularly difficult to have success. What stood out was Cousins' consistency doing simple things, something that has been a problem for the course of his career. He didn't throw the ball straight to a defender or repeatedly miss big play opportunities downfield.
“Cousins is very much a quarterback who is elevated by his supporting cast rather than a quarterback who elevates his supporting cast. He functions somewhat competently in ideal conditions and Washington can create those ideal conditions because of the crazy talent they have around him.
“The question is: How would Cousins look if he didn't have the second-best tight end in the league (Jordan Reed, behind only Rob Gronkowski in Cian’s mind), a dominant pass-blocking line and mismatch-creating receivers in every spot?”
And this was after the Thanksgiving game:
http://presnapreads.com/2016/11/25/kirk-cousins-and-empty-drives/
This guy is so biased against Cousins, it's not even funny. Going into this season, he ranked him 28th out of every QB in the league: below Griffin. He had each QB listed in "tiers" and labeled Cousins a "decent backup". Grant Paulsen tweeted him and asked him to appear on their show to discuss the ranking he did, and he blocked him. Any mention of Cousins, non trolling attempts to, and he blocks you on twitter. Who the hell is this guy, and how can anyone not only take him seriously, but employ him? He thinks QB's like Bridgewater and Tyrod Taylor are good, and QB's like Cousins, Flacco, and Dalton are mediocre. His whole schtick is to praise the dual threat QB's, and he's had an agenda, interestingly enough after Cousins was named the starter over Griffin.