DEHog wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:Don't look now but you just answered your own question...I see a lot of people giving credit to SM and other for the improvement that they have shown, but are quick to blame Gruden for the negative. If the HC gets the blame when things go bad shouldn’t he be given some credit when they go right??
I don't give Jay credit because Jay didn't do it last year. How many rookies played last year? How many made an impact? If Jay deserved credit for player development and acquisition, it would have revealed itself before. He can have credit Dunbar. Sure.
I give Scot credit for bringing in talent and a new culture into this franchise. Neither of which existed prior to his arrival. I give the DC credit for coaching up his young guys and off-the-street players and making impact games. The more people this defense loses, the better they seem to get. We've watched DC ADJUST his defense to the strenghts of his personnel. Hall is playing saftey now, in some sort of hybrid scheme where he and Goldson alternate. Baker is finally fully emergaing. Houston bates is out here making huge plays! Our star MLB is benched, replaced with Compton! The addition of Compton elevated the play of Perry Riley.
Blackmon - off the street and covering tier 1 receivers
Mason - off the street and balled out of his mind on MNF
Dunbar - speaks for itself
Jay was brought in as an offensive guy, and he'd get credit...full credit for any offensive mastery. There is none. It's regressed in many ways. Who has developed under him?
Where have we seen the adjustments and curating of scheme to the strengths of the personnel is Grudens regard? We haven't. One of his best players in D. Young can barely get a snap. He'd rather play a tackle at TE and tip his hand, because he runs 75% of the time that Compton is in. They just isn't that damn bright.
Deadskins wrote:You have to give a coach at least three seasons, especially a rookie coach. We don't know that he is going to get fired next year. Let Scot have another draft and see what Gruden can do with an improved roster. I feel your frustration, and I agree that Gruden hasn't shown much to this point, but I can't condone starting over again this quickly. Of course, if that's what Scot wants to do, then who am I to say no?

An improved roster? He has one now.
- He has the best QB on the roster who isn't too shabby.
- A former NFL leading rusher, who he's completely destroyed
- A former PB FB in his prime, who he doesn't use.
- A top 5 receiving TE.
- ProBowl LT, 1st round rookie at RG and a RT playing damn near at a ProBowl level
- Garcon is a monster
- Jackson barely gets used
- crowder
I mean Jay has weapons. Sure, we can use help at center and LG. Most definitely. But, we've also watched the Patrios play every-freaking-offensive linemen out of position and win games. Obviously, we aren' the Patriots but we SHOULD BE GETTING MORE THAN 1.6 YPC on first down.
This is the main gripe with Gruden. Injuries are gonna happen in this league and we lost all our TE"s and it DESTROYED his running system. He's been completely unable to adjust to it. And horribly unwilling to put his FB in the game. And not only is he unable to adjust his roster/scheme, he doesn't seem capable of maknig in-game adjustments.
If I'm saying anything that's not factual, please correct me. But what I really want to know is, what is he gonna improve upon in his third year that he couldn't have done this year? I think we know who and want Jay is at this point. He's a nobody. The Bengals obviously don't miss him, as they're excelling in his absence. And look at what he had to work with there, you'd have to be an atrocious coach to fail with those guys.