Blocking or lack thereof

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
User avatar
markshark84
Hog
Posts: 2642
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:44 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Blocking or lack thereof

Post by markshark84 »

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Cool story bro.
maybe before you post in threads with random bs you ought to read the title.
Buying Robert more time, imo, is the only way he has a CHANCE to be successful. He may very well be toast, but more time to make a decision- if only a little- would benefit him aswell as the staff trying to evaluate him.

McCoys superior skills got him sacked almost with the same frequency vs sub par pass rushers and he had the best lineman in when he played aswell. Not excuses by any stretch- read his stat line. Read the op. Read and find we agree more then you are disagreeing with no one in particular. .


I think the internet Gods are in your favor because I wrote this long winded reply, but when I hit submit it never showed up..... now I don't feel like or have the time to reply (I'm too busy doing karate in my parent's basement :wink: ). Perhaps this is the internet God's way of telling me to shut up. :oops:

2 quick notes: The subject of this thread implies that blocking (and you literally cited everyone other than the QB as needing to improve) is a major contributing factor to our demise as it relates to the offense and inherently, the QB. I personally think it is not everyone around him, but in fact 95% RGIII's fault (I am not counting playcalling; just on-field play). Also, literally every single poster within this thread discussed the QB and subject matter similar to mine --- yet I'm the one that doesn't understand the title..... :roll: Again, your subjectivity clouds what you read.

Second, McCoy's sack rate is 12% vs. RGIII's 17%. If you include Cousins & McCoy it drops to 5.2%. And trust me, I ALWAYS read the stat lines. I'm a meticulous SOB. You should know that by now.
RIP Sean Taylor. You will be missed.
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
CKRGiii
Posts: 7010
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:56 pm
Location: 505 New Mexico repn

Re: Blocking or lack thereof

Post by cowboykillerzRGiii »

^ if you read the entire thread I wasnt happy where it strayed either.. and I posted as much.

I understand your sentiment about the qb needing to improve, but on the few plays he was asked to BLOCK he did a good enough job. We shall see how Colt fares behind this terrible line.

12% vs 17% isnt much of a difference if you factor in the pass rush level of talent as well as who was playing on the line, particularly left tackle
Last edited by cowboykillerzRGiii on Wed Nov 26, 2014 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
#21 forever in our hearts
“I wanted to just… put his lights out ….because, you know, …Dallas sucks…” - Dexter Manley
User avatar
StorminMormon86
Hog
Posts: 2368
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:23 pm
Location: Pasadena, MD

Re: Blocking or lack thereof

Post by StorminMormon86 »

I think you should change your username to cowboykillerzMcCoy
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
CKRGiii
Posts: 7010
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:56 pm
Location: 505 New Mexico repn

Re: Blocking or lack thereof

Post by cowboykillerzRGiii »

Im good thanks.
Coming from StorminMormon tho, THATS pretty funny!
#21 forever in our hearts
“I wanted to just… put his lights out ….because, you know, …Dallas sucks…” - Dexter Manley
User avatar
StorminMormon86
Hog
Posts: 2368
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:23 pm
Location: Pasadena, MD

Re: Blocking or lack thereof

Post by StorminMormon86 »

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Im good thanks.
Coming from StorminMormon tho, THATS pretty funny!

I was just ribbing you. No big deal.

But seriously, if we beat Dallas again...
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Re: Blocking or lack thereof

Post by riggofan »

StorminMormon86 wrote:
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Im good thanks.
Coming from StorminMormon tho, THATS pretty funny!

I was just ribbing you. No big deal.

But seriously, if we beat Dallas again...


Seriously if McCoy was somehow able to beat Dallas TWICE this season, it might help make up for one of the worst Redskins seasons in recent memory. Just a bit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You can't do epic **** with basic people." - DJax
"We're on the rise, man, whether you're on the train or not." - Josh Norman
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
CKRGiii
Posts: 7010
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:56 pm
Location: 505 New Mexico repn

Re: Blocking or lack thereof

Post by cowboykillerzRGiii »

StorminMormon86 wrote:
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Im good thanks.
Coming from StorminMormon tho, THATS pretty funny!

I was just ribbing you. No big deal.

But seriously, if we beat Dallas again...


I know bro, its all good.. luckily- ruining rg3, benching him, even getting rid of him cant take away his debut year sweeping the pukes. Ima really flip my lid if he winds up being a puke and shredding US for years to come- behind that line its possible. . The Jerruh already is showing his support of rg3 so its not so far fetched
#21 forever in our hearts
“I wanted to just… put his lights out ….because, you know, …Dallas sucks…” - Dexter Manley
PulpExposure
Pushing Paper
Pushing Paper
Posts: 4860
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:01 pm

Re: Blocking or lack thereof

Post by PulpExposure »

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:
StorminMormon86 wrote:
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Im good thanks.
Coming from StorminMormon tho, THATS pretty funny!

I was just ribbing you. No big deal.

But seriously, if we beat Dallas again...


I know bro, its all good.. luckily- ruining rg3, benching him, even getting rid of him cant take away his debut year sweeping the pukes. Ima really flip my lid if he winds up being a puke and shredding US for years to come- behind that line its possible. . The Jerruh already is showing his support of rg3 so its not so far fetched


I'm not worried if he goes to Dallas. They'll ruin him just like we did.

I'm worried he'll go to Philadelphia where Chip Kelly is getting production from Mark Sanchez, who is freaking terrible. I can see RG3 going there and getting rehabilitated, and to a system that is not too dissimilar to his Baylor offense. And then watching him torch us twice a year.
User avatar
StorminMormon86
Hog
Posts: 2368
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:23 pm
Location: Pasadena, MD

Re: Blocking or lack thereof

Post by StorminMormon86 »

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:
StorminMormon86 wrote:
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Im good thanks.
Coming from StorminMormon tho, THATS pretty funny!

I was just ribbing you. No big deal.

But seriously, if we beat Dallas again...


I know bro, its all good.. luckily- ruining rg3, benching him, even getting rid of him cant take away his debut year sweeping the pukes. Ima really flip my lid if he winds up being a puke and shredding US for years to come- behind that line its possible. . The Jerruh already is showing his support of rg3 so its not so far fetched

If he goes to Dull-ass you really need to change your user name.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Re: Blocking or lack thereof

Post by SkinsJock »

I don't understand - I thought the reason we might not keep RG3 is because the kid cannot play QB

if that's the case, who cares where he goes :lol:


I'm surprised more of his detractors aren't hoping he will go to an NFC East franchise so we can get to laugh at him on the sidelines 2 times a year - I mean, if he cannot play QB, why not let him go somewhere he can't hurt us :twisted:
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Post Reply