hi.
way to catch the ball Hankerson!
I appreciate it when a WR makes a grab and he's been doing that a lot recently.
as a Hankerson hater, I've been eating my crow but it tastes ok with pepper sauce as long as we're winning.

Chris Luva Luva wrote:markshark84 wrote:The definition of "ignorant" is someone that lacks knowledge or training --- being unlearned.
Yeah, for someone who is such a "learned" football expert, you overly critizize a WR who is essentially playing his rookie campaign due to last years injury.
A "learned" football expert would know that it takes MOST WR's 2-3 years to find their way in the NFL.
So that would insinuate a lack of knowledge, thus ignorance on the subject. Especially when you comment in such a condescending tone towards a poster who was celebrating.markshark84 wrote:I don't see it that way.
Apparently, that's been an issue for you for the past few pages.![]()
I disagree with you, CounterTrey, about 3 people and NFL.com.![]()
![]()
Who's the common denominator in this situation?
tribeofjudah wrote:I'll tell you one thing..........
I like this #85 better than that Ocho Cinco guy........LOL
markshark84 wrote:I guess you conveniently stop reading when you don't want to fight a losing battle...................
markshark84 wrote:It is my expectation that our 1-3 rd picks are top performers.
Chris Luva Luva wrote:markshark84 wrote:I guess you conveniently stop reading when you don't want to fight a losing battle...................
Why would I keep reading when the first thing out your mouth was wrong? You said that you compared him to the other receivers on the roster and he falls short. However, the stats prove otherwise... I'm sure you still have nothing to say about that.
langleyparkjoe wrote:markshark84 wrote:It is my expectation that our 1-3 rd picks are top performers.
You have expectations for our Skins?
Honestly, I came into this season with very low- no expectations. For our draft picks it was the same thing for me because our program hasn't been stable in over a decade.
Fast forward to today and what we've seen.. well yea, maybe from now on I'd expect our early draft picks to work out better since we seem to have stability.
Maybe look at it that way bro?
Countertrey wrote:Guys... Consider taking it to smack. This thread is about Hank...
langleyparkjoe wrote:Well.. even as much of a "Hank hater" that I am, since he has improved I'll wait it out.![]()
Let's not forget they made a couple good choices this year in the draft bro.
Chris Luva Luva wrote:mastdark81 wrote:Gotta realize this is virtually everyones first year
Don't bring rational thought into this thread.
FLWSkin wrote:It's really his first year, so I think he still can get better. And I thought of this too. They always talk about the speed of the game for young players. Think about it, this guy went from several years of Jacory Harris at the U and Rex last year to having RGIII throwing him the ball. That is a BIG difference in how the ball comes at you. I'm hoping that is part of Paul's problem too, he just needs to get used to a faster ball closer to the line of scrimmage.
markshark84 wrote:FLWSkin wrote:It's really his first year, so I think he still can get better. And I thought of this too. They always talk about the speed of the game for young players. Think about it, this guy went from several years of Jacory Harris at the U and Rex last year to having RGIII throwing him the ball. That is a BIG difference in how the ball comes at you. I'm hoping that is part of Paul's problem too, he just needs to get used to a faster ball closer to the line of scrimmage.
FLW -- I also agree that Hank can improve and I hope he does. He just needs to work on a couple things --- they are big things, but things you can improve on with major work. Hopefully last years injury was the causes of his balance and he'll be able to work that out and adjust to it during the offseason.
I think your point about adjusting to the speed is a good one. From personal experience, it took me a FULL year to adjust to the speed of the game from high school to college. I have been told that the adjustment from college to pro is 100X worse.
markshark84 wrote:langleyparkjoe wrote:markshark84 wrote:It is my expectation that our 1-3 rd picks are top performers.
You have expectations for our Skins?
Honestly, I came into this season with very low- no expectations. For our draft picks it was the same thing for me because our program hasn't been stable in over a decade.
Fast forward to today and what we've seen.. well yea, maybe from now on I'd expect our early draft picks to work out better since we seem to have stability.
Maybe look at it that way bro?
Haha. I also had low expectations this year. The team has greatly exceeded those. In fact, this is the first year (since 2007 I believe) that I have been more than 1 game off on my pre-season record prediction.
But I will always set expectations for every player. Maybe it is because I am in a profession where you are constantly graded/analyzed. But, as I have said, everything is relative. Do you see me complaining about Robinson or Briscoe or Paul? No -- because I don't believe they have the ability to be a high level performer. We have more invested in Hankerson, therefore we need to receive greater output.
Honestly, take a look at how Belichick analyzes his players. It is brutal. I am similar. You need to expect maximum effort and execution. I am not satisfied unless I see 100%. I believe Hankerson can give us more and I see very specific things he must improve upon to get there.
However, I agree with you in that ANY pick made by Danny/Vinny should just be disregarded (or at least I hope that is what you are saying). Hankerson was drafted by MS/BA --- therefore I do have expectations.
crazyhorse1 wrote:markshark84 wrote:langleyparkjoe wrote:markshark84 wrote:It is my expectation that our 1-3 rd picks are top performers.
You have expectations for our Skins?
Honestly, I came into this season with very low- no expectations. For our draft picks it was the same thing for me because our program hasn't been stable in over a decade.
Fast forward to today and what we've seen.. well yea, maybe from now on I'd expect our early draft picks to work out better since we seem to have stability.
Maybe look at it that way bro?
Haha. I also had low expectations this year. The team has greatly exceeded those. In fact, this is the first year (since 2007 I believe) that I have been more than 1 game off on my pre-season record prediction.
But I will always set expectations for every player. Maybe it is because I am in a profession where you are constantly graded/analyzed. But, as I have said, everything is relative. Do you see me complaining about Robinson or Briscoe or Paul? No -- because I don't believe they have the ability to be a high level performer. We have more invested in Hankerson, therefore we need to receive greater output.
Honestly, take a look at how Belichick analyzes his players. It is brutal. I am similar. You need to expect maximum effort and execution. I am not satisfied unless I see 100%. I believe Hankerson can give us more and I see very specific things he must improve upon to get there.
However, I agree with you in that ANY pick made by Danny/Vinny should just be disregarded (or at least I hope that is what you are saying). Hankerson was drafted by MS/BA --- therefore I do have expectations.
Speaking of Robinson, I'm surprised he doesn't see more action. He's been thrown to 19 times, caught 11, and scored 3 times. His percentage of catches per throw isn't bad, when you consider most of the passes thrown his way are low percentage passes deep . I expect nothing of Paul and Briscoe and will be shocked if they're on the team next year.
I know he got a pretty good zip on the ball. He has a quick release. . . once I seen a coupla' throws, I was just like 'Yeah, he's that dude.'"