Draft needs who and when

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Morgan33
newbie
Posts: 16
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 3:51 pm
Location: North Carolina

Draft needs who and when

Post by Morgan33 »

1st - RGIII - about time...
3rd - Best Tackle available
4th - ILB - hopefully to back up
4th - OL - Center from Baylor would be Awesome!
5th - TE - Cooley is injury prone, Davis is liability and Pulson, who knows
6th - QB - someone like Kellen Moore might be a good fit and could hold a clip board for a while
7th - Depth on OL - DL

This is direction I believe we should be looking in for the draft. I think that Hurt and smith are good depth at OL, but we needs to upgrade in order to move up to the next level. There has been mention that Dallas clark is an interest to Bruce, but I hope Cooley can return to his old form, but a young set of legs could be good. There is a TE out of Ga that could slip to us due to off the field issues that is very talented.

QB - depth. We will draft RGIII or Luck depending on what the colts decide. Then there is sexy Rex. I dont think that Crompton will be anything and Beck shouldnt be back. Get a guy late like Kellen Moore who is very smart and can learn the offense.

Redskins need to resign Fletcher, Hightower, Fox and bring in some OL for depth.

Thoughts???
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

Before taking a TE, we need help at the DB positions. This also happens to be the one area this draft is somewhat deep in.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
44diesel
Hog
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:04 pm

Post by 44diesel »

Welcome, Morgan!

I agree with you on most of this. We certainly need to build depth on the OL and ILB (I really hope we can come to an agreement with Fletcher), but I also think we need to look at adding depth in our secondary.

I think that Cooley will hopefully be able to bounce back this year, although maybe not quite to the level that he used to. TE is an area that will need to be addressed as early as next year. Since Cooley ain't getting any younger and Fred Davis has had his issues passing those pesky drug tests.

Dallas Clark, although a phenomenal TE is 32 and although could be a stop gap solution, he doesn't really fit in with the youth movement the Shannahans are implementing in Washington.
"Givin'em the Business!"
Morgan33
newbie
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 3:51 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by Morgan33 »

I can see where you are coming from. Wilson and Hall will start and then Griffin and Barnescan play nickle. Skins might bring back westbrook to help out as well. TE is not very deep this year in the draft and may need to be selected prior for that reason.
Morgan33
newbie
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 3:51 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by Morgan33 »

44diesel wrote:Welcome, Morgan!

I agree with you on most of this. We certainly need to build depth on the OL and ILB (I really hope we can come to an agreement with Fletcher), but I also think we need to look at adding depth in our secondary.

I think that Cooley will hopefully be able to bounce back this year, although maybe not quite to the level that he used to. TE is an area that will need to be addressed as early as next year. Since Cooley ain't getting any younger and Fred Davis has had his issues passing those pesky drug tests.

Dallas Clark, although a phenomenal TE is 32 and although could be a stop gap solution, he doesn't really fit in with the youth movement the Shannahans are implementing in Washington.


I agree, I was just passing along something tht I had read earlier today in case someone had not heard that.
User avatar
44diesel
Hog
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:04 pm

Post by 44diesel »

Morgan33 wrote:I agree, I was just passing along something tht I had read earlier today in case someone had not heard that.

Right on. I hadn't actually heard that about Bruce's interest in Clark. (source?)

If for some reason Cooley wasn't ready to go (or Davis goes one toke over the line) and we got him for the right price I wouldn't mind Clark, but I'm hoping this year, we're set at that position.
"Givin'em the Business!"
User avatar
skinpride1
Hog
Posts: 1012
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 12:23 am
Location: rocky mount va.

Post by skinpride1 »

Right tackle and saftey at top of list. Please no w r .
RG3....Super Man....check out my socks!!!
User avatar
Burgundy&Wha?
Hog
Posts: 4610
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 6:13 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by Burgundy&Wha? »

Never ever ever ever again should we take a late round QB after spending a top 5 pick on a QB. :roll:
Morgan33
newbie
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 3:51 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by Morgan33 »

44diesel wrote:
Morgan33 wrote:I agree, I was just passing along something tht I had read earlier today in case someone had not heard that.

Right on. I hadn't actually heard that about Bruce's interest in Clark. (source?)

If for some reason Cooley wasn't ready to go (or Davis goes one toke over the line) and we got him for the right price I wouldn't mind Clark, but I'm hoping this year, we're set at that position.


http://www.realredskins.com/rich-tandle ... -back.html

It doesnt say that we want clark, I infered a little, but Allen has clark ranked ahead of Fletcher.
User avatar
44diesel
Hog
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:04 pm

Post by 44diesel »

Morgan33 wrote:
44diesel wrote:
Morgan33 wrote:I agree, I was just passing along something tht I had read earlier today in case someone had not heard that.

Right on. I hadn't actually heard that about Bruce's interest in Clark. (source?)

If for some reason Cooley wasn't ready to go (or Davis goes one toke over the line) and we got him for the right price I wouldn't mind Clark, but I'm hoping this year, we're set at that position.


http://www.realredskins.com/rich-tandle ... -back.html

It doesnt say that we want clark, I infered a little, but Allen has clark ranked ahead of Fletcher.

Thanks! However, it's actually Pat Kirwan of CBSsports (the former Jets GM) who has Clark on his list of 25 Best Available Free Agents. The only quote from Allen is that he told Kirwan on his XMradio show that they're working hard to resign London.
"Givin'em the Business!"
User avatar
SouthLondonRedskin
Hog
Posts: 1217
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:02 pm
Location: Co. Cavan, Ireland
Contact:

Post by SouthLondonRedskin »

Dallas Clark, although a phenomenal TE is 32 and although could be a stop gap solution,


I swear to God if we EVER sign a player called DALLAS.....

:puke:
In Scot We Trust!
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

I'll start with our 3rd round pick since our 1st is obvious.

3rd - Best available OL or S (with the push going to RT)
4th - Best available OL or ILB (S if not picked in 3rd)
4th - Best available OL or CB (ILB or S if not picked before)
5th - Best available OL or (whatever is left from ILB, S, and CB)
6th - Best available OL or (whatever is left from ILB, S, and CB)
7th - Best available OL or (whatever is left from ILB, S, and CB)

I know this is abit of a cop out, but if they used all of their picks after RG# to draft OL I would be OK with that! Even knowing half wouldn't make the team. The highest priority is RT followed closely by LG and C.

No TE, no OLB, no DE, no DT (unless it is a true NT), no RB, no WR (unless a 1st or 2nd round WR drops to the 3rd or 4th round - respectively).

These are the position I think we still need staters at in order of need:

RT, LG, ILB (if London isn't back), FS, SS.

These are position we either need depth at or player to challenge for starting spot:

ILB, C, CB, CB, LT, RG, true NT.
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
User avatar
44diesel
Hog
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:04 pm

Post by 44diesel »

SouthLondonRedskin wrote:
Dallas Clark, although a phenomenal TE is 32 and although could be a stop gap solution,


I swear to God if we EVER sign a player called DALLAS.....

:puke:

hahaha! I was thinking the same thing, but I can't deny his ability to catch the football. :lol:
"Givin'em the Business!"
User avatar
PAPDOG67
Hog
Posts: 1047
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:51 pm
Location: Staten Island

Post by PAPDOG67 »

SouthLondonRedskin wrote:
Dallas Clark, although a phenomenal TE is 32 and although could be a stop gap solution,


I swear to God if we EVER sign a player called DALLAS.....

:puke:


Why, Dallas Starz, the LB we drafted a few years back didn't work out well???
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

GM Hogster's Big Board Including Possible Moves

3rd Round

You can find starters in the 3rd at some positions that are traditionally undervalued such as (Interior O Line & RB). As a result, this pick is huge.

Mitchell Schwartz (OT Cal) Started all 51 games at Cal. First Team All Pac 12. Outstanding Run Blocker & Physical Pass Blocker. Academic All American. Has played Left Tackle. Could become a more athletic Jon Jansen at RT.

LaMichael James RB Oregon: I know, we don't "need" a RB. But, this guy is a late 1st round talent in my view. He's compact, explosive, and elusive. Could become a hybrid of Ray Rice & Darren Sproles. If he's there, he's a steal.

Brandon Washington OG/OT Miami. I admit, that I am a huge advocate of Lamicheal James and I project he will become a top asset out of the backfield. But, I would run to the podium to take versatile interior lineman Washington. He's 6'4 320 with a good deal of athleticism inside. I think he can become a Pro Bowl caliber interior for the Redskins. The 3rd Round is essentially like the early 2nd when it comes to interior O Linemen. If he's the pick, get ready to watch either Kory or
Chester take a seat.

4th Round

While, if I am the GM, I am keeping both of these 4th round picks, one or both of these picks could be packaged to move into the 3rd or 2nd round--depending on how a trade is structured. I'll base my projections on us keeping both.

102 Overall: Chase Minnifield CB Virginia. If he falls this far, this is a no-brainer. At 6 feet and with a long wingspan, he would be a perfect nickle corner. Good pedigree, and went to an excellent school. He's no dummy.

Nigel Bradham ILB FSU. The only reason why he's behind Minnifield is because he plays a position where he may not play immediately. Minnifield could be our Nickle Corner day 1. While, Bradham would be behind Riley & Fletcher at least initially. I am a Riley fan, but Bradham is the kind of freak you want inside. He is a better interior pass rusher than Riley, and he can't be blocked with a running back. Monster. 6'3 240 with a desire to hit people. Nasty streak. I want this guy on my team.


109 Overall: Nate Potter - OT/OG Auburn. We need O Line talent, and Potter has it. Depending on how the early picks turn out, I would be looking at guys like Potter & Washington who are versatile enough to play interior positions.

Ladarious Green TE Louisiana Laffayette: 6'6 Tight End with a 36 inch vertical. Runs a 4.5 forty. Chris Cooley is getting older, and it would add a tremendous wrinkle to our offense if we could pair Green & Davis at TE for RG 3 to throw too. Especially, if you add a guy like LaMichael James as an explosive RB out of the backfield. And, guys like Brandon Washington, and/or Nate Potter on the O Line. Some might argue that we don't need a TE. I disagree. The Patriots showed what two athletic TE's can do, especially when you get up on the 6'6-6'7 height range. Red Zone threats who can spread the defense out will help RG3 thrive in his early years. Tight Ends are a QBs best friend.
Last edited by The Hogster on Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
User avatar
44diesel
Hog
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:04 pm

Post by 44diesel »

skinsfan#33 wrote:I'll start with our 3rd round pick since our 1st is obvious.

3rd - Best available OL or S (with the push going to RT)
4th - Best available OL or ILB (S if not picked in 3rd)
4th - Best available OL or CB (ILB or S if not picked before)
5th - Best available OL or (whatever is left from ILB, S, and CB)
6th - Best available OL or (whatever is left from ILB, S, and CB)
7th - Best available OL or (whatever is left from ILB, S, and CB)

I know this is abit of a cop out, but if they used all of their picks after RG# to draft OL I would be OK with that! Even knowing half wouldn't make the team. The highest priority is RT followed closely by LG and C.

No TE, no OLB, no DE, no DT (unless it is a true NT), no RB, no WR (unless a 1st or 2nd round WR drops to the 3rd or 4th round - respectively).

These are the position I think we still need staters at in order of need:

RT, LG, ILB (if London isn't back), FS, SS.

These are position we either need depth at or player to challenge for starting spot:

ILB, C, CB, CB, LT, RG, true NT.

+1 I agree!

The original post suggested the center from Baylor. I like the idea of RG3 being comfortable with the guy he's taking his snaps from right out the gate, but admittedly don't know much about him.

What's the word on this guy? Where's he expected to go in the draft?
"Givin'em the Business!"
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Re: Draft needs who and when

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

Morgan33 wrote:Thoughts???


Drafting for position is a great way to have a bomb of a draft.
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
User avatar
SouthLondonRedskin
Hog
Posts: 1217
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:02 pm
Location: Co. Cavan, Ireland
Contact:

Post by SouthLondonRedskin »

PAPDOG67 wrote:
SouthLondonRedskin wrote:
Dallas Clark, although a phenomenal TE is 32 and although could be a stop gap solution,


I swear to God if we EVER sign a player called DALLAS.....

:puke:


Why, Dallas Starz, the LB we drafted a few years back didn't work out well???


#-o WTF were they thinking with that!?!? Must have been a joke gone wrong... "Go on, I dare you to pick him in the draft!" kinda thing.

Could you imagine a CB in Texas called Washington Hogs...?!?

Nah, I guess not.
In Scot We Trust!
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

44diesel wrote:
skinsfan#33 wrote:I'll start with our 3rd round pick since our 1st is obvious.

3rd - Best available OL or S (with the push going to RT)
4th - Best available OL or ILB (S if not picked in 3rd)
4th - Best available OL or CB (ILB or S if not picked before)
5th - Best available OL or (whatever is left from ILB, S, and CB)
6th - Best available OL or (whatever is left from ILB, S, and CB)
7th - Best available OL or (whatever is left from ILB, S, and CB)

I know this is abit of a cop out, but if they used all of their picks after RG# to draft OL I would be OK with that! Even knowing half wouldn't make the team. The highest priority is RT followed closely by LG and C.

No TE, no OLB, no DE, no DT (unless it is a true NT), no RB, no WR (unless a 1st or 2nd round WR drops to the 3rd or 4th round - respectively).

These are the position I think we still need staters at in order of need:

RT, LG, ILB (if London isn't back), FS, SS.

These are position we either need depth at or player to challenge for starting spot:

ILB, C, CB, CB, LT, RG, true NT.

+1 I agree!

The original post suggested the center from Baylor. I like the idea of RG3 being comfortable with the guy he's taking his snaps from right out the gate, but admittedly don't know much about him.

What's the word on this guy? Where's he expected to go in the draft?


He actually rates favorably versus other Centers and is projected to go 3rd-4th Round.

I like Will Montgomery, and Kory Lichtensteiger can play center as well. I would go with a true interior lineman like Brandon Washington over a Center. I think Washington could start over Kory. Allow Kory to recover from ACL & MCL surgery as our backup Swing Guard/Center. Kory is already undersized at 290lbs. Putting him back inside right away on a refurbished knee is a recipe for disaster for Kory and RG3.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
skinsfan#33
#33
#33
Posts: 4084
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 9:44 am

Post by skinsfan#33 »

44diesel wrote:Welcome, Morgan!

Dallas Clark, although a phenomenal TE is 32 and although could be a stop gap solution, he doesn't really fit in with the youth movement the Shannahans are implementing in Washington.


I'm sorry, Clark in his prime was as good as Cooley! His two years in his prime. I know he had one season were he was better than Cooley, but he had Manning throwing to him what would Cooley have done in the Colts offense? Cooley has been much better over his career and is still much better than Clark. Cooley has 5 seasons with 700 yards or more. DC has two.

Clark has played one more season (seven more game) than Cooley and has one less catch. True he has more TDs but I say that is more of a factor of Peyton is "slightly" better than the QBs Cooley has had. Clark averages 47 catches and 543 yards per season, while Cooley averages 54 and 588.

By the way, Cooley isn't injury prone. He has had basically two injuries that kept him out of games. He has been available for every game for six out od his eight season. Clark has played one complete season in nine years!
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren

"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier

RIP James Oliver Rigney, Jr. 1948-2007
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

skinsfan#33 wrote:
44diesel wrote:Welcome, Morgan!

Dallas Clark, although a phenomenal TE is 32 and although could be a stop gap solution, he doesn't really fit in with the youth movement the Shannahans are implementing in Washington.


I'm sorry, Clark in his prime was as good as Cooley! His two years in his prime. I know he had one season were he was better than Cooley, but he had Manning throwing to him what would Cooley have done in the Colts offense? Cooley has been much better over his career and is still much better than Clark. Cooley has 5 seasons with 700 yards or more. DC has two.

Clark has played one more season (seven more game) than Cooley and has one less catch. True he has more TDs but I say that is more of a factor of Peyton is "slightly" better than the QBs Cooley has had. Clark averages 47 catches and 543 yards per season, while Cooley averages 54 and 588.

By the way, Cooley isn't injury prone. He has had basically two injuries that kept him out of games. He has been available for every game for six out od his eight season. Clark has played one complete season in nine years!


+1

That's about as thorough an argument in favor of Cooley over Clark as it gets. I think Ladarious Green deserves some consideration in the draft. He's a freak.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
User avatar
44diesel
Hog
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:04 pm

Post by 44diesel »

The Hogster wrote:
skinsfan#33 wrote:
44diesel wrote:Welcome, Morgan!

Dallas Clark, although a phenomenal TE is 32 and although could be a stop gap solution, he doesn't really fit in with the youth movement the Shannahans are implementing in Washington.


I'm sorry, Clark in his prime was as good as Cooley! His two years in his prime. I know he had one season were he was better than Cooley, but he had Manning throwing to him what would Cooley have done in the Colts offense? Cooley has been much better over his career and is still much better than Clark. Cooley has 5 seasons with 700 yards or more. DC has two.

Clark has played one more season (seven more game) than Cooley and has one less catch. True he has more TDs but I say that is more of a factor of Peyton is "slightly" better than the QBs Cooley has had. Clark averages 47 catches and 543 yards per season, while Cooley averages 54 and 588.

By the way, Cooley isn't injury prone. He has had basically two injuries that kept him out of games. He has been available for every game for six out od his eight season. Clark has played one complete season in nine years!


+1

That's about as thorough an argument in favor of Cooley over Clark as it gets. I think Ladarious Green deserves some consideration in the draft. He's a freak.


I agree. I never said Clark was better than Cooley. :shock: I was responding to someone saying that Bruce Allen was interested in Dallas Clark (which he's not).

Dallas Clark had some good years catching the ball from Peyton Manning and had sure hands in the redzone, but Cooley is the man!!! (which I have stated in other threads)

My point was that if Cooley were for some reason unable to play this season (which he's not), or if Fred Davis screws up and gets suspended (which he has not) then I'd be interested in him. It was a hypothetical statement.

My apologies if that was unclear, but let me rest assured that I think we are set at TE.
"Givin'em the Business!"
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

Brandon Washington OG/OT Miami

Image

LaMichael James RB Oregon

Image

Mitchell Schwartz OT Cal

Image

Chase Minnifield CB UVA

Image

Nigel Bradham ILB FSU

Image

Nate Potter OG/T Auburn

Image

Ladarius Green TE Lousiana Laffayette

Image

I would be more than satisfied with any 3 of these players with our 3rd & 4th Round picks. If I had it my way, we'd snag Brandon Washington, LaMichael James & Minnifield.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Post by riggofan »

Some really good info in here - well done!

I know we have holes to fill, but I think we gotta make those 3rd and 4th round picks really count this year. Seems to me we gotta draft best player available when our turn comes around whether its an o-lineman like most of us feel we need, or a steal of a RB like the Hogster pointed out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You can't do epic **** with basic people." - DJax
"We're on the rise, man, whether you're on the train or not." - Josh Norman
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

riggofan wrote:Some really good info in here - well done!

I know we have holes to fill, but I think we gotta make those 3rd and 4th round picks really count this year. Seems to me we gotta draft best player available when our turn comes around whether its an o-lineman like most of us feel we need, or a steal of a RB like the Hogster pointed out.


+1

To me, LaMichael James is this draft's Vincent Jackson. I was really high on Vincent Jackson when he was coming into the NFL. (Somewhere in one of these threads I made my case for him) Instead, we traded out of the 2nd round and picked Jason Campbell. I admit, I expected Jackson to be around in the 3rd. But he wasn't.

This year, I expect James to be that guy. A guy who can change an offense by adding a different dimension.

James runs a 4.37 Forty. And, at 5-10 200lbs. He's compact, and explosive enough to do great things in the stretch scheme, and the screen game. I'd use him as the true change of pace back with Roy Helu as the lead man.

When you have a QB like RG3 who runs a 4.3 and can throw the deep pass accurately. And, a checkdown back who can hit the flats running 4.3. Your offense immediately gets more dynamic. Who do you defend.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
Post Reply