Redskins-Eagles postgame thread

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

The fans that point to the Redskins' defense ONLY giving up 20 points are missing 1 little fact

the eagles offense did not need to score more than 20 points

there is NO WAY that the Redskins' offense is going to score 21 points with Kyle's play calling not suiting the defense he's up against OR the players he has on the field

MAKE NO MISTAKE - the eagles offense could have scored more points
Andy Reid would have killed his OC if they had tried to score more points
THIS would have put Vick in a position to make the same mistakes he's made so far this season - DUH :shock:

the eagles offense did what our offense should have done - took advantage of the players the eagles had on offense AND took advantage of what the Redskins defense gave them

SIMPLE really - WAKE UP KYLE
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
mrcatwalker
piggie
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 8:33 am
Contact:

Post by mrcatwalker »

Thanks for the warm welcoming SkinsJack, but if your team wants to win, Hightower needs to be out there on the field. He always gave us a hard time and I don't think this team will be any different.

I am not acclimated with your other running backs but the run followed up by the play action kills us. Also the run is why the defense can't get off of the field leading to the boys in electric blue being extremely exhausted by the 4th quarter.

I am looking forward to the rivalary of Hall and Steve Smith. Those are 2 bulls and if Hall isn't level headed he will give us some extra yards on penalties. It's going to be a fun game because out of the series Skins are winning 7-2.

The Panthers have one of the worst 3rd defenses as well as red zone. Our linebackers are getting jammed at the line and can't seem to decipher through the trash to find the backs. Don't get me wrong the pass defense is pretty tight but they can't get the run defense together and that's been the problem for the past few years even with the new coaching staff.
Fan beat writer Panthers News Central.com
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

The Redskins defense is getting it's act together and will be a force - the fact is that the offense has to help the defense as well - our running game does set up the play action pass but the OC get's away from the run game too easily

we have some issues on offense but no offense can be effective if they constantly turn the ball over or not take advantage of the players we have - Kyle seems to think that the game plan is more important than having the players suited to executing that same plan

we are still going to play well but our defense will not determine the outcome
the offense just needs to eliminate the mistakes and complement the defense

HOPEFULLY - Kyle takes a good look at the game film from this game and puts together a good plan for the Panthers this week


we may very well see Grossman and Hightower :roll:
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Kilmer72
Hog
Posts: 2543
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: Southerner in Yankee land :(

Post by Kilmer72 »

RayNAustin wrote:Well, for what it's worth .... if you have P. Manning or Brady or Rogers or Brees as your QB .... you can get away with a 75% - 25% pass/run imbalance, but if your QB is named Grossman or Beck, you just can't do it and expect to win. It's as simple as that.

As for the defense, I believe they played extremely well under the circumstances, given how long they spent on the field in the first half, their second half performance was lights out, and you couldn't ask for anything more ... NO POINTS. With the offense converting only 1 3rd down out of 10, and 4 interceptions, the defense was constantly under pressure and going against a top 5 offense, holding them to 20 points is a very good day. In spite of all of the offensive blunders, the defense kept the game from becoming a blow out, giving the Redskins a chance to get back into the game.

Offensively, well, horrible doesn't quite describe it, and it wasn't just Grossman (though he was pathetic). One int should have been caught by Davis ... that was a catchable ball and we just don't have a single receiver on this team that can go up high and come down with those types of balls.

But the combination of Rex's inability to differentiate between burgundy and green, and Kyle Shanahan's loathing of the run game is a killer combination. You cannot throw, throw, throw, run, throw throw, throw, run. This pattern was something that occurred quite often last year too ... and this year ... we're 3-0 with a 47+% run average, and 0-2 with a 30-% run ratio. So in my opinion, Kyle Shanahan is as much responsible for our offensive problems as is Grossman. You cannot hand the ball off 12 times in a game and win with the guys we have throwing and catching the ball.

And, I don't buy the excuse that because Philly jumped out to a quick lead, that forced us to abandon the run game .... they got the quick lead because this offense is being called like some kid playing Madden football, totally predictable, and incapable of making adjustments to what the defense is doing. 9 straight failures to convert 3rd downs? Did we even convert 1 in the first half?

If I'm a defensive coordinator and I'm playing the Redskins .... I am going to play the run, knowing that all I have to do is stop the run early, and then I can focus on playing the pass the rest of the game. Kyle Shanahan is way too quick to give up on the run.

Without the Matt Shaub - Andre Johnson combo that comprised 60-70% of the Texan's offensive production when Shanahan was there .... he's mediocre AT BEST, and in no way the "Boy Genius" people make him out to be. Kyle is constantly being out coached and out strategized by opposing defenses, and I really don't see a major improvement in offensive production from the impotent days of Zorn even with addition of more talent. We still can't score points.

You have got to run the ball 40% or more based on this team's talent level at QB and receivers. We don't have a game dominating QB and down field receiver like a Calvin Johnson or an Andre Johnson ... that's a fact. So we have to run to make the passing game work, not the other way around.

With the defense playing the way they are playing ... this offense needs to pound the ball, and someone needs to real in Kyle Shanahan and inform him that we do not have Aaron Rogers or Tom Brady ... we have Rex Grossman and John Beck, neither of which are going to keep defensive coordinators up late at night.


I agree Ray. Why is it when it is 3rd and 7 we call for a 2 yard pass play? Seems to me that the time for that is 2nd and 7. I do like Kyle because under him our receivers seem to get open more than what they did under previous coach's. You are right though, his play calling was the worst I have seen from him.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

When you are playing against teams with really bad defenses against the run like we played against last week and this week PLUS you have a QB that is a turnover machine, you do NOT call a pass play on 3rd and 7 unless you have a big lead

NO MATTER who the QB is this week, we need to run the ball and not get away from it until we have worn out the defense

we have lost 2 games this year because the offense did not take advantage of the teams we were playing against


Kyle needs to STEP IT UP - big time

hopefully we have Beck at QB
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Kilmer72
Hog
Posts: 2543
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:05 pm
Location: Southerner in Yankee land :(

Post by Kilmer72 »

SkinsJock wrote:When you are playing against teams with really bad defenses against the run like we played against last week and this week PLUS you have a QB that is a turnover machine, you do NOT call a pass play on 3rd and 7 unless you have a big lead

NO MATTER who the QB is this week, we need to run the ball and not get away from it until we have worn out the defense

we have lost 2 games this year because the offense did not take advantage of the teams we were playing against


Kyle needs to STEP IT UP - big time

hopefully we have Beck at QB


The problem is we can't seem to run on 3rd and 7 either when they are daring Rex to beat them. I was referring to calling a pass play on 3rd down that was not past the first down marker. I never understood why teams do this.
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

Kilmer72 wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:When you are playing against teams with really bad defenses against the run like we played against last week and this week PLUS you have a QB that is a turnover machine, you do NOT call a pass play on 3rd and 7 unless you have a big lead

NO MATTER who the QB is this week, we need to run the ball and not get away from it until we have worn out the defense

we have lost 2 games this year because the offense did not take advantage of the teams we were playing against


Kyle needs to STEP IT UP - big time

hopefully we have Beck at QB


The problem is we can't seem to run on 3rd and 7 either when they are daring Rex to beat them. I was referring to calling a pass play on 3rd down that was not past the first down marker. I never understood why teams do this.


Has anyone seen a single draw play in Kyle's game plan this year? Helu is IDEAL for that on a passing down.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

:lol: - my point is that punting the football on 4th down is better than turning the ball over

I agree with Trey - why is the draw play not seen very much by our offense - EVER
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
RayNAustin
Hog
Posts: 2370
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:56 am

Post by RayNAustin »

Kilmer72 wrote:
RayNAustin wrote:Well, for what it's worth .... if you have P. Manning or Brady or Rogers or Brees as your QB .... you can get away with a 75% - 25% pass/run imbalance, but if your QB is named Grossman or Beck, you just can't do it and expect to win. It's as simple as that.

As for the defense, I believe they played extremely well under the circumstances, given how long they spent on the field in the first half, their second half performance was lights out, and you couldn't ask for anything more ... NO POINTS. With the offense converting only 1 3rd down out of 10, and 4 interceptions, the defense was constantly under pressure and going against a top 5 offense, holding them to 20 points is a very good day. In spite of all of the offensive blunders, the defense kept the game from becoming a blow out, giving the Redskins a chance to get back into the game.

Offensively, well, horrible doesn't quite describe it, and it wasn't just Grossman (though he was pathetic). One int should have been caught by Davis ... that was a catchable ball and we just don't have a single receiver on this team that can go up high and come down with those types of balls.

But the combination of Rex's inability to differentiate between burgundy and green, and Kyle Shanahan's loathing of the run game is a killer combination. You cannot throw, throw, throw, run, throw throw, throw, run. This pattern was something that occurred quite often last year too ... and this year ... we're 3-0 with a 47+% run average, and 0-2 with a 30-% run ratio. So in my opinion, Kyle Shanahan is as much responsible for our offensive problems as is Grossman. You cannot hand the ball off 12 times in a game and win with the guys we have throwing and catching the ball.

And, I don't buy the excuse that because Philly jumped out to a quick lead, that forced us to abandon the run game .... they got the quick lead because this offense is being called like some kid playing Madden football, totally predictable, and incapable of making adjustments to what the defense is doing. 9 straight failures to convert 3rd downs? Did we even convert 1 in the first half?

If I'm a defensive coordinator and I'm playing the Redskins .... I am going to play the run, knowing that all I have to do is stop the run early, and then I can focus on playing the pass the rest of the game. Kyle Shanahan is way too quick to give up on the run.

Without the Matt Shaub - Andre Johnson combo that comprised 60-70% of the Texan's offensive production when Shanahan was there .... he's mediocre AT BEST, and in no way the "Boy Genius" people make him out to be. Kyle is constantly being out coached and out strategized by opposing defenses, and I really don't see a major improvement in offensive production from the impotent days of Zorn even with addition of more talent. We still can't score points.

You have got to run the ball 40% or more based on this team's talent level at QB and receivers. We don't have a game dominating QB and down field receiver like a Calvin Johnson or an Andre Johnson ... that's a fact. So we have to run to make the passing game work, not the other way around.

With the defense playing the way they are playing ... this offense needs to pound the ball, and someone needs to real in Kyle Shanahan and inform him that we do not have Aaron Rogers or Tom Brady ... we have Rex Grossman and John Beck, neither of which are going to keep defensive coordinators up late at night.


I agree Ray. Why is it when it is 3rd and 7 we call for a 2 yard pass play? Seems to me that the time for that is 2nd and 7. I do like Kyle because under him our receivers seem to get open more than what they did under previous coach's. You are right though, his play calling was the worst I have seen from him.


Well, to answer the question ... I would cite one example that I noticed from the replay from behind the QB ... I don't remember when this occurred during the game, but we had a 3rd down .... and seems to me it was 3rd and 10 maybe 3rd and 8 ... Grossman had time, but pressure got in his face because he had nowhere to go with the ball. The replay showed we had three receivers in parallel patterns .. running abreast with their backs still facing the QB, 15 yards down field and one guy underneath just over the line of scrimmage. This should never EVER happen ... not on third down or any other down. How do you expect to make a first down with all three wideouts 15 yards downfield in the same general area, with their backs to the QB?

And I don't care what the eagles were doing to stop the run ... you cannot establish a running game handing the ball off 12 times in a game. And the Redskin offense as it currently exists should NEVER run a naked backfield formation. NEVER. This offense is not good enough in the pass game or pass pro to go empty, and commit to a pass ..... at least not with an immobile Grossman as the QB! He can't outrun a DT, so the defense does not have to stay honest such that you have to do with a running QB.

Personally, I just don't see a lot of wisdom or creativity in this offense ... why not try to take advantage of his speed and get Helu out in space .. screens, pitches? Why do we not see more of those bubble screens to Moss ... these plays are successful ... so keep doing what works until you force the defense to adjust to you, thereby opening up other areas. We don't make good offensive adjustments during games or at halftime. We're predictable ... we run on run downs (if we run at all), and pass on passing downs. Kyle Shanahan is like a bad poker player that can't help but start wiggling in his seat when he's dealt a good hand.

I don't like his offense ... his strategy ... or his inability to put a game plan together that attacks the opponent's weaknesses or improvise based on what defenses are are doing.

To make a long story short ... Junior sucks ... and we're stuck with him, and we don't have an elite QB and a dominating receiver to make his one dimensional offensive strategy work. Not only do you need a better balance than 70-30 pass-run, but you need to pass on running downs and run on passing downs a little bit.

If indeed the eagles were stacking the box ... there should have been more opportunities to hit some plays in the passing game .... good God, everyone has run the ball successfully on the Eagles this year ... they've been giving up 140+ per game, so if they were over committing to stop the run, there is no excuse for not finding a way to capitalize on that.

As a side note ... maybe big Mike Shanahan should have waited till the off season to hit Vegas for a little black jack, given the biggest game of the year was coming??? Do you think Joe Gibbs would have taken a couple of days off during a buy week with the freaking Eagles on deck? Or do you think he might have decided that those days would have been better spent figuring out a few ways to introduce his son to the freaking end zone?

I was not thrilled about the prospect of a father and Son coaching combo to begin with .. and I'm even less impressed now. Remember, these guys are the ones that decided that Grossman & Beck were perfectly capable to run the offense. Well, where's the beef?
Last edited by RayNAustin on Tue Oct 18, 2011 3:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
StorminMormon86
Hog
Posts: 2368
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:23 pm
Location: Pasadena, MD

Post by StorminMormon86 »

Everyone needs to remember that Beck came in this game in the 4th quarter with no preparation whatsoever. He got a couple of sideline "warmups" and that was it. He has had zero practice with the starting offense since preseason. I'd also say that 2-3 of Beck's passes that were dropped should have been caught by the receivers (Stallworth's especially). If Grossman was the guy who, since he was named the starter, had a better grasp of this offensive scheme ran by Kyle Shanahan, why has he yet to do ANYTHING in the red zone for the past 3 weeks now? It took Beck two drives to do what Grossman hasn't been able to do practically all season. There is no QB debate. Good riddance Grossman.

And yes, Rat Face's kid needs to step his play calling up and stop calling a game like he's playing the latest version of Madden or something.
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

mrcatwalker wrote:
Irn-Bru wrote:But mostly I agree with welch. I'm going to skip reading anything Skins-related this week, and just wait to see what the Skins can put together next Sunday.


You feel like I feel about the Carolina Panthers lost to the Falcon's last week. A division lost, but at least you all are on a better winning road than we are. Although we play the Skins this week, I think your team has a good shot of winning because we can't stop the run. The last 5 teams we've played had running backs that had over 100 yard games and the most was by Forte for 204 and the Saints had like 180 something.

So it's not good on the ground, so as long as the Skins keep the ball on the ground, the chances of winning greatly improves. That should make you feel better about going into the week.


Philly came into last week's game ranked 30th against the run and they stopped our running game by stacking the line, They dared Rex to beat them by throwing and you know what happened there. I would expect Carolina to do the same whether it be Beck or Grossman who starts.

I would like to think that a mobile QB like Beck could make your guys back off and open up the running lanes.
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

Countertrey wrote:
Kilmer72 wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:When you are playing against teams with really bad defenses against the run like we played against last week and this week PLUS you have a QB that is a turnover machine, you do NOT call a pass play on 3rd and 7 unless you have a big lead

NO MATTER who the QB is this week, we need to run the ball and not get away from it until we have worn out the defense

we have lost 2 games this year because the offense did not take advantage of the teams we were playing against


Kyle needs to STEP IT UP - big time

hopefully we have Beck at QB


The problem is we can't seem to run on 3rd and 7 either when they are daring Rex to beat them. I was referring to calling a pass play on 3rd down that was not past the first down marker. I never understood why teams do this.


Has anyone seen a single draw play in Kyle's game plan this year? Helu is IDEAL for that on a passing down.


I can't definitively say I have seen a draw this year. I agree with your points that we need to run draw plays and that Helu would be a good choice to run the play.
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

Red_One43 wrote:After no gain on first down, on second down, the center hiked the ball over Vick's head into the end zone, Rak, who was in coverage, left his man and went after Vick who was having trouble picking up the ball in the end zone. Vick flings the ball out of bounds, possibly intentional grounding in the end zone, but no - Rak is called for roughing the passer - I hear it was a helmet blow, but I was at the game and could not tell by the replays at the game. Instead of third and 10 from their 16, they are given a 1st at their 31.

Horrible call on both ends. Definitely intentional grounding;he picked up the ball, spun around, and fired it out of bounds with no receiver even close. He never left the tackle box; textbook IG. On the roughing call, Orakpo hit him chest high right after he threw it, No helmet contact at all, and no way to pull up from the hit. Vick was right on the goal line when it happened, so I don't know if it was a safety or not, but it should have been, because on the INT that gave them the ball, the defender went down at the 1, but they spotted the ball at the 3 (18 after the other BS penalty - should have been offsetting fouls).
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

Cappster wrote:I cannot wait to see the responses in the Panthers post game thread if we win. They will be a complete 180 from we are not a playoff team to hells yeah we are gonna win the division!

I'm still saying hell yeah, we are going to win our division!
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

roybus14 wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:There are a number of posters here that have not changed their opinion of where we are as a team and what should be happening here in order for this franchise to be performing at a consistently good level

We are looking at 8-8 and always were - we are hoping we can bring in a QB that will help the offense
- that is NOT happening with either of these QBs

we just lost 1 game - we are still the same bad offense even if we had won the game

I hope we go to Beck but he is NOT going to be our future great QB - we are still the same 'bad' offense
NEITHER QB is the answer, no doubt about that


Beck will help the offense - of course, nothing matters if the play calling continues to SUCK :lol:


I hear you but why do people keep saying that Beck is not the QB of the future? What is saying that if the Shanny's give this guy a true chance, why can't he be a QB of the future?? What is stopping him from becoming that? What happens if this guy gets the rest of the season and turns out to be the guy? If Rex can get nine lives, why can't Beck??

Exactly!
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

One more thing about this game that upset me: Our clock management. We were down by two scores with 6 minutes left and we're still huddling up and taking 30 seconds per play. A little urgency please!
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
StorminMormon86
Hog
Posts: 2368
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:23 pm
Location: Pasadena, MD

Post by StorminMormon86 »

And we also burned our time outs before the 2 minute warning, and that's always been a pet peeve of mine.
RayNAustin
Hog
Posts: 2370
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:56 am

Post by RayNAustin »

StorminMormon86 wrote:And we also burned our time outs before the 2 minute warning, and that's always been a pet peeve of mine.


Yeah ... this is done quite regularly for some strange reason, by a lot of teams. Why on earth would you burn a timeout just a handful of seconds before the 2 Min warning, saving 6 or 7 seconds, when you could save it until afterward and save 30 seconds?

It makes no sense to me whatsoever.
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

Deadskins wrote:
Red_One43 wrote:After no gain on first down, on second down, the center hiked the ball over Vick's head into the end zone, Rak, who was in coverage, left his man and went after Vick who was having trouble picking up the ball in the end zone. Vick flings the ball out of bounds, possibly intentional grounding in the end zone, but no - Rak is called for roughing the passer - I hear it was a helmet blow, but I was at the game and could not tell by the replays at the game. Instead of third and 10 from their 16, they are given a 1st at their 31.

Horrible call on both ends. Definitely intentional grounding;he picked up the ball, spun around, and fired it out of bounds with no receiver even close. He never left the tackle box; textbook IG. On the roughing call, Orakpo hit him chest high right after he threw it, No helmet contact at all, and no way to pull up from the hit. Vick was right on the goal line when it happened, so I don't know if it was a safety or not, but it should have been, because on the INT that gave them the ball, the defender went down at the 1, but they spotted the ball at the 3 (18 after the other BS penalty - should have been offsetting fouls).


When we saw the flag, we thought it was for intentional grounding. The booing completely drowned out the Refs expalanation.One of the coaches ran out down the sideline and exchanged words with the ref as well. I was afraid Rak would get another flag because he was so animated. The penalty and the non call of intentional grounding were huge momentum changers in the game. You are right about the other personal foul call as well.

This game made two games in a row, that we got BS calls for personal fouls after going the first three games basically PF free.
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

RayNAustin wrote:
StorminMormon86 wrote:And we also burned our time outs before the 2 minute warning, and that's always been a pet peeve of mine.


Yeah ... this is done quite regularly for some strange reason, by a lot of teams. Why on earth would you burn a timeout just a handful of seconds before the 2 Min warning, saving 6 or 7 seconds, when you could save it until afterward and save 30 seconds?

It makes no sense to me whatsoever.

What's not to understand? You save more time by using the TO before the TMW. The time keeper knows to stop the clock at the TMW, and so he does it the instant the play ends. A TO has to be called and go through the ref, which usually costs a few seconds. Then there is also the five or six seconds you wasted by letting the clock tick down to the TMW. It's a no-brainer really. It's one of my pet peeves when teams don't call them before the TMW.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

And speaking of stopping the clock: why did the clock not stop when Fred Davis was knocked out of bounds on the final drive of the first half? There was less than five minutes on the clock, so it should have stopped. That wound up costing us about 30 seconds and forced the FG try when we could have had more time to get the TD.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
Red_One43
Hog
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Post by Red_One43 »

I listened to Greg Cosell of NFL Films on ESPN 980 (DC Local area) describe what the Eagles did to shut down the Redskins run. He said that one of the wide 9 DEs was brought in for more of a 6 technique. He said that the LBs normally play 6 to 7 yards off the line of scrimmage. They moved them up 2 to 3 yards off the line of scrimmage and stacked them inside in an effort to make Torain run wide and string him out. They were clearly successful.

When Greg was asked shouldn't you be able to exploit the middle of the field with this set up. He said absolutely and added, tongue in cheek, but you can't throw interceptions.
Post Reply