In bru,
This site list all credibility for me when I looked ast how it had Moss and ey ranked. It had ey as something like the 40th best TE in the league and Moss around the 60th.
Just absurd!!!
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren
"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier
Washington passed on the chance to sign high-profile players in free agency and instead pursued role players willing to sacrifice for the greater good. Shanahan repeatedly has stressed that this year, the Redskins’ roster comprises hungry, high-character players.
the 2 QBs are a BIG issue for Mike (& Kyle) BUT they did not think that any of the QBs in the draft were worth all that much and are waiting to address this as soon as they can identify a really good QB for this franchise AND their offense - in years past we may have 'reached' with this position
THESE GUYS ARE GOOD
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
skinsfan#33 wrote:In bru, This site list all credibility for me when I looked ast how it had Moss and ey ranked. It had ey as something like the 40th best TE in the league and Moss around the 60th.
Just absurd!!!
It's not a site with subjective rankings. If Moss comes in as the 60th best receiver, that doesn't necessarily mean they are saying he should be drafted 60th if you were starting a new team/league.
So the stats can't be used in quite the same way a lot of people like to use them. They are measurements for very specific things (and you can find all the info for what goes into them on the site).
jeremyroyce wrote:Why does Hall need to recreate this mess regarding Big Albert? There is no doubt that Big Albert was a boob, but I don't understand why that was necessary?
Because he was asked by a reporter doing a story about this year's team not having big names like last year's team. It's not like he's gone out of his way to trash Fat Albert. He actually doesn't even mention him by name. It's just that everyone knows who he's talking about when he talks about so-called stars who won't come to work.
Did D Hall steal somebody's puppy?? Why so much hate for a guy who plays so well for us most of the time.
skinsfan#33 wrote:In bru, This site list all credibility for me when I looked ast how it had Moss and ey ranked. It had ey as something like the 40th best TE in the league and Moss around the 60th.
Just absurd!!!
It's not a site with subjective rankings. If Moss comes in as the 60th best receiver, that doesn't necessarily mean they are saying he should be drafted 60th if you were starting a new team/league.
So the stats can't be used in quite the same way a lot of people like to use them. They are measurements for very specific things (and you can find all the info for what goes into them on the site).
I know they seem to cherry pick some stats to tel the story they want to tell. I'm not saying they are intentionally trying to make the Skins players look bad, they just have some stats that they value higher than others.
No way, ey or Moss end up that low unless you are using some weird stats.
There is no way DHall is the 83rd best CB in the NFL.
Yes, those stats were cherry picked!
"Dovie'andi se tovya sagain"
(It is time to roll the dice) Tai'shar Manetheren
"Duty is heavier than a Mountain, Death is lighter than a feather" Tai'shar Malkier
jeremyroyce wrote:Why does Hall need to recreate this mess regarding Big Albert? There is no doubt that Big Albert was a boob, but I don't understand why that was necessary?
Because he was asked by a reporter doing a story about this year's team not having big names like last year's team. It's not like he's gone out of his way to trash Fat Albert. He actually doesn't even mention him by name. It's just that everyone knows who he's talking about when he talks about so-called stars who won't come to work.
Did D Hall steal somebody's puppy?? Why so much hate for a guy who plays so well for us most of the time.
*dapz* Hogster
That's what I'm saying man. I understand he isn't Champ, Revis, or Nandi but good grief already.
D Hall is a good fit here. He has great catch up speed, he baits the QB, sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't. I think peeps here are dead on, if he gets a good safety behind him, he'll have a better season than last year.
#21 (36) This IS and will always be the High watermark where all new DB's are measured.
Ha ha lpJ I told him the same mess yesterday if he aint a skin why would I care if I get it right?? So petty man reminds me of this fanatic I met once... Such rediculous posts. We get u hate this roster and hope we fail and magically acquire luck and a whole new roster. now move on doode your posts are redundant and jus an eye sore anymore.
Hate hall? post it up at dallascowpukes forum..
I dig hall and stats don't tell all.. Any other b&g db have as many ints? Tds? Dare I say WIN games? W a healthy secondary better LB help d hall will flourish into the best thing since DG 28. -lmao in my optimistic eyes at least.
Glad at least this D is confident and headed in the right direction.
#21 forever in our hearts “I wanted to just… put his lights out ….because, you know, …Dallas sucks…” - Dexter Manley
jeremyroyce wrote:Why does Hall need to recreate this mess regarding Big Albert? There is no doubt that Big Albert was a boob, but I don't understand why that was necessary?
Because he was asked by a reporter doing a story about this year's team not having big names like last year's team. It's not like he's gone out of his way to trash Fat Albert. He actually doesn't even mention him by name. It's just that everyone knows who he's talking about when he talks about so-called stars who won't come to work.
Did D Hall steal somebody's puppy?? Why so much hate for a guy who plays so well for us most of the time.
I never said that I hated Hall, and I don't believe that my response indicated that either. This is the comment that I had a problem with.
Do we have a guy that we’re paying $100 million to? No we don’t. But who needs a guy that you’re going to pay $100 million to if he won’t come out onto the field and play?
That in my opinion was not necessary and in my opinion that is throwing someone under the bus, and that again in my opinion is recreating this whole Big Albert saga which this team does not need to go through again.
jeremyroyce wrote:That in my opinion was not necessary and in my opinion that is throwing someone under the bus, and that again in my opinion is recreating this whole Big Albert saga which this team does not need to go through again.
Dude, Fat Albert wasn't "thrown" under the bus, he jumped under the bus
Hail to the Redskins!
Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him
Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
jeremyroyce wrote:That in my opinion was not necessary and in my opinion that is throwing someone under the bus, and that again in my opinion is recreating this whole Big Albert saga which this team does not need to go through again.
Dude, Fat Albert wasn't "thrown" under the bus, he jumped under the bus
He went in for a play, but couldn't get up, that's why the bus ran him over.
#21 (36) This IS and will always be the High watermark where all new DB's are measured.
Not sure that you can have quality free agents when you are 26 million below the cap. They did have some big departures but Mcnabb and Haynesworth brough drama, whether or not it was intentional is beyond me. Frankly, I though Shanahan was a little out of his element with those two.
RedskinsRule56 wrote:You just made a big mistake Harley Hog. You want proof Hall blows here you go. Read it and weep.
Posting links that Irn-Bru already posted does not invalidate Harley's criticism of your previous post.
Hardly a big mistake a hole. You may notice the term riposte, a term from swordplay, referring to a counter thrust. My critique of the post was almost a verbatim copy of your response to my post on another thread, you hypocritical son of a cowpuke. Whip out your stats all day, in the end he was MVP of the probowl. How many "better" corners single handedly won two games for their teams last year? This is the last time I am responding to any of your tripe, you slimy TROLL. Just wanted to clarify. The only way it was a big mistake was that it fed the TROLL. May you suffer disappointments at every turn, scumbag!
Everybody funny, now you funny too ...
"The measure of who we are is what we do with what we have." -Vince Lombardi
hall is a double edged sword he makes plays and will give up some ...... about the blitzes we will be throwing at qbs it will count on if we get to the qb make him make poor decisions the more time you give any qb he will fine an open wr
jeremyroyce wrote:That in my opinion was not necessary and in my opinion that is throwing someone under the bus, and that again in my opinion is recreating this whole Big Albert saga which this team does not need to go through again.
Dude, Fat Albert wasn't "thrown" under the bus, he jumped under the bus
I don't think that Hall was 'attacking' the fat slob as much as he was making the point that the players that are here are making an effort and how hard it must have been to have players that were just showing up and, for the most part, rather than contribute to anything they were bent on creating a bad atmosphere on the the field and in the clubhouse
Good DBs are made better by getting pressure up front - our defense may not be really good this season but they will be better than we have seen for a few years - we have gotten better with our front 7 and with our secondary
I like having a guy like Hall playing for our secondary - he's a good CB
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
jeremyroyce wrote:That in my opinion was not necessary and in my opinion that is throwing someone under the bus, and that again in my opinion is recreating this whole Big Albert saga which this team does not need to go through again.
Dude, Fat Albert wasn't "thrown" under the bus, he jumped under the bus
More like stumbled. I don't think he CAN jump
Skins fan since '55
"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
Irn-Bru wrote:I hate to exercise caution about a guy who single-handedly won us two games a year ago, I'm concerned that he's going to regress to the mean on turnovers this year while his coverage continues to be spotty.
No doubt with Hall we live by the sword and die by the sword. But as I and others bashed Rogers for drawing more passes and allowing QB's to try to thread a needle because he was zero threat to intercept them, Hall diverts a lot of passes because he's an enormous threat to intercept. He also causes more overthrows and out of bounds throws as well as QB's want to make sure he can't get his hands on the ball. And he's on a good receiver as well. You can't just count passes given up and INTs.
ey ranked. It had 
