Weather for the game

frankcal20 · Post by **frankcal20** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:20 pm

Here is what I've found:

Saturday: Cloudy with showers. High 69F. Winds NNE at 5 to 10 mph. Chance of rain 60%.

Sat. night: Rain showers in the evening becoming more intermittent overnight. Low 61F. Winds N at 5 to 10 mph. Chance of rain 40%.

Sunday: Morning showers. Highs in the upper 70s and lows in the low 60s.

If the rain holds off and we have some weather coming into the game on Sunday - does this give the Skins a leg up?

I think so! We've played all preseason and training camp with bad weather and this team is ready for it. We know that Manning has issues handling the ball in rain and with this D-line so amp'ed up, I think we make the plays needed, give the offense a short field and score some TD's.

Cooley may have a big game if weather is a factor.

Jake · Post by **Jake** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:32 pm

The weather should be perfect in my living room.

gay4pacman · Post by **gay4pacman** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:19 pm

i think weather is kind of an overrated factor. Both teams play in the same weather and have the same makeup.

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:21 pm

Weather isn't as good as it used to be in the old days. Before we lost the Empire.

I don't see the weather being any kind of factor, but if I'm honest with myself, I'll admit I know less about weather than I do about plumbing, and I know precious little about that.

Sorry, I'm rambling.

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 2:47 pm

gay4pacman wrote:Both teams play in the same weather and have the same makeup.

I was going to make a lipstick on a hog joke here, but I'm too curious about what you mean by "the same makeup."

ATX_Skins · Post by **ATX_Skins** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 3:45 pm

The bar im going to has a roof

gay4pacman · Post by **gay4pacman** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:13 pm

Deadskins wrote:
gay4pacman wrote:Both teams play in the same weather and have the same makeup.

I was going to make a lipstick on a hog joke here, but I'm too curious about what you mean by "the same makeup."

Defense oriented run heavy teams with game manager QB types. Both teams are built with the same blueprint.

ChocolateMilk · Post by **ChocolateMilk** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:45 pm

gay4pacman wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
gay4pacman wrote:Both teams play in the same weather and have the same makeup.

I was going to make a lipstick on a hog joke here, but I'm too curious about what you mean by "the same makeup."

Defense oriented run heavy teams with game manager QB types. Both teams are built with the same blueprint.

Except their game managing QB just signed a $100 mil contract.

gay4pacman · Post by **gay4pacman** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:05 pm

He also won a superbowl. There are obviously differences, but the teams are built on the same principles. That was my point.

frankcal20 · Post by **frankcal20** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 9:41 pm

If I had a choice, I would take our QB over Manning. I know the results are different but the situations are 100% different. Manning has had the same offense to grow in vs. JC keeps having to change. I think our QB wins out based on his athletic ability and he's shown he can make GREAT choices.

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:14 pm

I have never liked the QB or coach - I do not think that Campbell is a special QB but given the same players I'd take Campbell over Manning - actually I'd take Campbell over a lot of other QBs in the NFL right now :wink:

I just think we are going to win this game and start the season right - I would love the sight of Coughlin on the sideline in the 4th qtr if he's trailing against this defense

ChocolateMilk · Post by **ChocolateMilk** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:00 am

gay4pacman wrote:He also won a superbowl. There are obviously differences, but the teams are built on the same principles. That was my point.

He won a Superbowl ONLY because of his defensive line. If they had faced anyone else in that superbowl they probably would have lost. But because they faced a team that relied squarly on their passing game. They were able to blitz and rush Tom Brady all they wanted and not have to worry about the run. With Strahan, Tuck, and Uminyora. I mean holy shizz. You CAN NOT give the credit to Eli Manning. I mean everytime I hear him talk on tv I mistake him for a handicap person. The real MVP of that game was Justin Tuck and ever freaking person here knows it. Eli Manning is a talented QB yes but he is not a $100 mil QB.

gay4pacman · Post by **gay4pacman** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:32 pm

ChocolateMilk wrote:
gay4pacman wrote:He also won a superbowl. There are obviously differences, but the teams are built on the same principles. That was my point.

He won a Superbowl ONLY because of his defensive line. If they had faced anyone else in that superbowl they probably would have lost. But because they faced a team that relied squarly on their passing game. They were able to blitz and rush Tom Brady all they wanted and not have to worry about the run. With Strahan, Tuck, and Uminyora. I mean holy shizz. You CAN NOT give the credit to Eli Manning. I mean everytime I hear him talk on tv I mistake him for a handicap person. The real MVP of that game was Justin Tuck and ever freaking person here knows it. Eli Manning is a talented QB yes but he is not a $100 mil QB.

i dont understand your arguement. I didnt say he won the superbowl for the giants i said he won the superbowl. My point is that the teams are built the same way. Game manager quarterbacks with a run heavy offense and dominant defenses. Did you mean to quote me there....not sure what your point is chocolate..... :?:

I agree with everything you said about the giants superbowl, maybe you dont understand what i am saying...

Hoss · Post by **Hoss** » Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:53 pm

let's keep this on topic........

Sunday:
Partly sunny in the morning...then clearing. Highs around 80. Northwest winds 5 to 10 mph.

Sunday night:
Partly cloudy in the evening...then becoming mostly clear. Lows in the upper 50s. Northwest winds around 5 mph.

ChocolateMilk · Post by **ChocolateMilk** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:52 am

gay4pacman wrote:
ChocolateMilk wrote:
gay4pacman wrote:He also won a superbowl. There are obviously differences, but the teams are built on the same principles. That was my point.

He won a Superbowl ONLY because of his defensive line. If they had faced anyone else in that superbowl they probably would have lost. But because they faced a team that relied squarly on their passing game. They were able to blitz and rush Tom Brady all they wanted and not have to worry about the run. With Strahan, Tuck, and Uminyora. I mean holy shizz. You CAN NOT give the credit to Eli Manning. I mean everytime I hear him talk on tv I mistake him for a handicap person. The real MVP of that game was Justin Tuck and ever freaking person here knows it. Eli Manning is a talented QB yes but he is not a $100 mil QB.

i dont understand your arguement. I didnt say he won the superbowl for the giants i said he won the superbowl. My point is that the teams are built the same way. Game manager quarterbacks with a run heavy offense and dominant defenses. Did you mean to quote me there....not sure what your point is chocolate..... I agree with everything you said about the giants superbowl, maybe you dont understand what i am saying...

Haha yeah uuh sorry about that post man.. When I posted it, I was umm -drinking