CanesSkins26 wrote:Not too surprising. Alexander isn't anywhere near the player he once was.
It's amazing really that so many fans think the talent of a NFL player is the main reason that they do so well statistically.
Alexander was only as good as the line blocking for him. He never was as good as he looked.
The reason that the Vikings were so good at rushing the ball last year was not so much due to the talent of the RB BUT more importantly because of the guy they got from Seattle.
This is a team game and having players that play well together is far more important than having talented players surrounded by players who do not.
This is why we do not need talented players as much as we need players who make the other players they play with better.
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
CanesSkins26 wrote:Not too surprising. Alexander isn't anywhere near the player he once was.
It's amazing really that so many fans think the talent of a NFL player is the main reason that they do so well statistically.
Alexander was only as good as the line blocking for him. He never was as good as he looked.
The reason that the Vikings were so good at rushing the ball last year was not so much due to the talent of the RB BUT more importantly because of the guy they got from Seattle.
This is a team game and having players that play well together is far more important than having talented players surrounded by players who do not.
This is why we do not need talented players as much as we need players who make the other players they play with better.
Oh, I agree with you about the line. Seattle's running game took a big hit when they lost Hutchinson. However, I think that even if they still had the same line, Alexander would still be struggling. He's had injury problems and physically just doesn't look like the player that he was.
CanesSkins26 wrote:Not too surprising. Alexander isn't anywhere near the player he once was.
Alexander was only as good as the line blocking for him. He never was as good as he looked.
Oh, I agree with you about the line. Seattle's running game took a big hit when they lost Hutchinson. However, I think that even if they still had the same line, Alexander would still be struggling. He's had injury problems and physically just doesn't look like the player that he was.
You are right on - I'm being a little harsh about Alexander primarily because he got that huge contract after his great year. I just felt that Seattle made a big mistake in deciding not to match that very good contract from the Vikings - I know it was a contract that seemed ridiculous BUT good offensive line blockers are the primary reason why good backs look great Hutchinson helped Alexander get a lot of those yards through the left side of that line. Actually, I agree with you in that he was a decent back but the team made a mistake in their estimation of what he was going to be like both as a RB and without Hutchinson
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)