Chris Luva Luva wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:- This year those players are rumored to be cut in droves
2 were due to injury.
2 were due to poor play.
KazooSkinsFan wrote:Wouldn't that indicate somehow maybe management was right to not pay what other teams that are now cutting them paid?
No because how they play somewhere else doesn't mean we would have had that some misfortune.
1. Clark played just as well there as he did here.
2. Smoot played better here.
3. Lavar played well for NY as he did towards the end of 2005.
4. Chad Morton is nothing special, same deal as when he was here.
Lavar and Clark are getting injury settlements? I assume they are the injured ones you referred to.
Chris Luva Luva wrote:No because how they play somewhere else doesn't mean we would have had that some misfortune.
This is REALLY stretching to give your team no credit at all. Not only did other teams cutting them not mean they were overpaid, but they would have played better for us. You know that, our management didn't. Yeah.
I think
- Clark, I would like to have kept. Knowing Preileau would go out the first play of the season I would have paid what Pittsburgh did. Not knowing it I think he was overpaid. I'd be glad to have him back, but not at "any price."
- Smoot, was overpaid. I'd be glad to have him back, but not at "any price."
- LaVar, was just glad to be rid of him. He was a major talent but his flaws were greater then his strengths. I don't want him back for any price.
- Chad, I agree with you.