Why is Gibbs sticking with Brunell?
- FiveWidez
- Hog
- Posts: 593
- youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 4:33 pm
- Location: Rockville, MD
Why is Gibbs sticking with Brunell?
I am starting to believe it has so much to-do with their encounter in FL when Gibbs had his health issue and Brunell "saved" his life. This ties into them both being EXTREMELY religious. Now I am a god-fearing man but I am not a part of the "Christian Right" or whatever they are called. I am just posing the point that maybe Gibbs feels like he owes his "Christian Brother" for saving his life. I don't know. Maybe I am just searching for an answer. Anyway, below are some interesting religious articles on Brunell.
http://www.acfnewsource.org/religion/fo ... hurch.html
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethi ... cover.html
http://www.acfnewsource.org/religion/fo ... hurch.html
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethi ... cover.html
-
- Mmmm...donuts
- Posts: 2400
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 3:15 pm
- Location: How much text will they let me fit in this 'Location' space? I mean, can I just keep writing and wr
My sense is that Gibbs knows enough to have a general separation of church and football. I think he truly believes that MB gives the team the best chance to win every week. If he's blind to MB's weaknesses, I think it has more to do with his preference for veteran QBs than it does his faith.
I'm a jack of all trades, the master of three
Rockin' the tables, rockin' the mikes, rockin' the young lay-dees.
Rockin' the tables, rockin' the mikes, rockin' the young lay-dees.
-
- +++++++++
- Posts: 5227
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
- Contact:
You can get me to believe that Brunell was given additional consideration for being a Christian at the time of his signing... but you can't convince me his beliefs have anything to do with why he's still starting.
Do people realize that Mark B has completed 64.1% of his passes and has a 90.4 QB rating?
Those numbers are 5th and 11th in the league respectively. He's also got 7 TD's and 3 INT's.
He's not doing a bad job, but Joe Gibbs is right... the QB position is high profile and when the team fails people look at the QB to fix it.
Starting Campbell IMO would be giving up on the season... of course, maybe the season is already lost, or maybe it's worth it to get Campbell some reps, but Brunell is not the downfall of this team.
Do people realize that Mark B has completed 64.1% of his passes and has a 90.4 QB rating?
Those numbers are 5th and 11th in the league respectively. He's also got 7 TD's and 3 INT's.
He's not doing a bad job, but Joe Gibbs is right... the QB position is high profile and when the team fails people look at the QB to fix it.
Starting Campbell IMO would be giving up on the season... of course, maybe the season is already lost, or maybe it's worth it to get Campbell some reps, but Brunell is not the downfall of this team.
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
joebagadonuts wrote:My sense is that Gibbs knows enough to have a general separation of church and football. I think he truly believes that MB gives the team the best chance to win every week. If he's blind to MB's weaknesses, I think it has more to do with his preference for veteran QBs than it does his faith.
I near-death experience can change a man. And if Brunnel gives us the best chance to win then we need to face the fact that last year was a fluke and we are in need of another "rebuilding".
-
- FanFromAnnapolis
- Posts: 12025
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
- Location: on the bandwagon
- Contact:
FiveWidez wrote:joebagadonuts wrote:My sense is that Gibbs knows enough to have a general separation of church and football. I think he truly believes that MB gives the team the best chance to win every week. If he's blind to MB's weaknesses, I think it has more to do with his preference for veteran QBs than it does his faith.
I near-death experience can change a man. And if Brunnel gives us the best chance to win then we need to face the fact that last year was a fluke and we are in need of another "rebuilding".
Who's "we"? I'm certain that the Redskins wouldn't agree that last year was a fluke. . .
Skinsfan55 wrote:You can get me to believe that Brunell was given additional consideration for being a Christian at the time of his signing... but you can't convince me his beliefs have anything to do with why he's still starting.
Do people realize that Mark B has completed 64.1% of his passes and has a 90.4 QB rating?
Those numbers are 5th and 11th in the league respectively. He's also got 7 TD's and 3 INT's.
He's not doing a bad job, but Joe Gibbs is right... the QB position is high profile and when the team fails people look at the QB to fix it.
Starting Campbell IMO would be giving up on the season... of course, maybe the season is already lost, or maybe it's worth it to get Campbell some reps, but Brunell is not the downfall of this team.
I don't care about the stats. He is not doing a great job if we have WR (good WR) running around open and he dumps it off to RBs on 3rd and long. 2 or 3 of his TDs have been on late game drives when the game was over. The completion percentage is inflated b/c of the 22 for 22 game.
Irn-Bru wrote:FiveWidez wrote:joebagadonuts wrote:My sense is that Gibbs knows enough to have a general separation of church and football. I think he truly believes that MB gives the team the best chance to win every week. If he's blind to MB's weaknesses, I think it has more to do with his preference for veteran QBs than it does his faith.
I near-death experience can change a man. And if Brunnel gives us the best chance to win then we need to face the fact that last year was a fluke and we are in need of another "rebuilding".
Who's "we"? I'm certain that the Redskins wouldn't agree that last year was a fluke. . .
We is me and you and every other fan who bought into all this hype about the season. I really don't care what the Redskins believe about last year because they are proving on the field that it was a fluke.
-
- ---
- Posts: 18887
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
- Location: AJT
- Contact:

Gibbs believes and likes Brunell a lot and has a track record of sticking with his QB's till the bitter end. He'll show JC that same confidence when he struggles as a rookie QB. Dont bother mentioning Patrick because he sucks and continues to suck in NY.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
Chris Luva Luva wrote::lol: So know its Jesus's fault we're losing? Talk about grasping for straws. Gibbs got Brunell because he liked him as a QB and as a person. You dont have to be a Christian to be a good person and if Brunell wasn't a Christian he still would have gotten the job.
Gibbs believes and likes Brunell a lot and has a track record of sticking with his QB's till the bitter end. He'll show JC that same confidence when he struggles as a rookie QB. Dont bother mentioning Patrick because he sucks and continues to suck in NY.
1) Gibbs has proven how bad a personnel guy he is
2) Gibbs also has a track record for winning but we see what has happened to that
3) Where did I say it was Jesus' fault? Please point that out to me. I am saying MAYBE Gibbs feels a bond with Brunell and it is clouding his judgment
-
- Hog
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 11:21 am
- Location: Dayton MD
-
- FanFromAnnapolis
- Posts: 12025
- Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
- Location: on the bandwagon
- Contact:
FiveWidez wrote:1) Gibbs has proven how bad a personnel guy he is
2) Gibbs also has a track record for winning but we see what has happened to that
3) Where did I say it was Jesus' fault? Please point that out to me. I am saying MAYBE Gibbs feels a bond with Brunell and it is clouding his judgment
I think you want things both ways. Since Gibbs has been back, our personnel management has been great until a few of our moves this year (namely, AA and Carter, as well as a lack of bulking up the secondary). If you're going to point to a "proven" track record of bad personnel management, you'll need to reach much farther back. . .but you don't want anyone to do that for the track record of winning.
Gibbs showed as recently as last year that he can win (still not buying it as a 'fluke'). Considering how every phase of our team has undergone frustrations this year, I'm waiting to see if he can help assemble a cohesive unit by the end of the year before I pass any judgements on it. 2006 is a work in progress, and it alone won't swing my opinion one way or the other until I can get the whole picture.
-
- ---
- Posts: 18887
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
- Location: AJT
- Contact:
FiveWidez wrote:1) Gibbs has proven how bad a personnel guy he is
I agree to an extent
FiveWidez wrote:2) Gibbs also has a track record for winning but we see what has happened to that
So who do you suggest take over?
FiveWidez wrote:3) Where did I say it was Jesus' fault? Please point that out to me. I am saying MAYBE Gibbs feels a bond with Brunell and it is clouding his judgment
I was joking when I said that but since you asked...
FiveWidez wrote:I am starting to believe it has so much to-do with their encounter in FL when Gibbs had his health issue and Brunell "saved" his life. This ties into them both being EXTREMELY religious.
What does him "saving" his life have to with religion? Do you think that Gibbs thinks that God sent Brunell to save his life on that? Im just trying to understand your reasoning behind it.

FiveWidez wrote:I am just posing the point that maybe Gibbs feels like he owes his "Christian Brother" for saving his life.
I dont think it has anything to do with that at all. Im not even sure his dedication to Brunell is deeper than sticking up for a Vet QB.
FiveWidez wrote:I don't know.
None of us do.
FiveWidez wrote:Maybe I am just searching for an answer.
Exactly.
FiveWidez wrote:Anyway, below are some interesting religious articles on Brunell.
I didnt read the articles but again, what does this have to do with football, redskins or the upcoming game?
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
-
- swine
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 4:44 pm
-
- ---
- Posts: 18887
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
- Location: AJT
- Contact:
Irn-Bru wrote:Gibbs showed as recently as last year that he can win (still not buying it as a 'fluke').
Its my humble opinion that last years "fluke" was due to this....
Irn-Bru wrote:Since Gibbs has been back, our personnel management has been great until a few of our moves this year (namely, AA and Carter, as well as a lack of bulking up the secondary).
I think it was the lack of acquisitions in the past years that catapulted us to the playoffs. The chemistry of this team got screwed this year. Hopefully they'll pick up on this.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
Chris Luva Luva wrote: Gibbs believes and likes Brunell a lot and has a track record of sticking with his QB's till the bitter end. He'll show JC that same confidence when he struggles as a rookie QB. Dont bother mentioning Patrick because he sucks and continues to suck in NY.
Why not mention Ramsey? Is he an NFL starter? No, I'm not arguing that; at this point, I think the evidence is clear that he's not very good. However, coming off the '04 season, he was clearly better than Brunell that year, and he even finished with a win (vs. Vikings). Yet Gibbs yanked him the first chance he got. It doesn't matter that Brunell was OK last year; it matters that he gave Ramsey (a young QB) virtually zero slack, and yet Brunell (a 'supersmart' veteran QB) continues to get a ton of opportunities to lose us games. If you were Campbell (a young QB), how much confidence in your coach would you have? As long as Brunell is on the roster, Gibbs is going to look for the first chance to put him in there.
Irn-Bru wrote:FiveWidez wrote:1) Gibbs has proven how bad a personnel guy he is
2) Gibbs also has a track record for winning but we see what has happened to that
3) Where did I say it was Jesus' fault? Please point that out to me. I am saying MAYBE Gibbs feels a bond with Brunell and it is clouding his judgment
I think you want things both ways. Since Gibbs has been back, our personnel management has been great until a few of our moves this year (namely, AA and Carter, as well as a lack of bulking up the secondary). If you're going to point to a "proven" track record of bad personnel management, you'll need to reach much farther back. . .but you don't want anyone to do that for the track record of winning.
Gibbs showed as recently as last year that he can win (still not buying it as a 'fluke'). Considering how every phase of our team has undergone frustrations this year, I'm waiting to see if he can help assemble a cohesive unit by the end of the year before I pass any judgements on it. 2006 is a work in progress, and it alone won't swing my opinion one way or the other until I can get the whole picture.
19-22....wait for the end of the 2006 season to pass judgments? How many games do you need?
- redskingush
- Hog
- Posts: 1369
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:01 pm
- Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Re: Why is Gibbs sticking with Brunell?
FiveWidez wrote:I am starting to believe it has so much to-do with their encounter in FL when Gibbs had his health issue and Brunell "saved" his life. This ties into them both being EXTREMELY religious. Now I am a god-fearing man but I am not a part of the "Christian Right" or whatever they are called. I am just posing the point that maybe Gibbs feels like he owes his "Christian Brother" for saving his life. I don't know. Maybe I am just searching for an answer. Anyway, below are some interesting religious articles on Brunell.
http://www.acfnewsource.org/religion/fo ... hurch.html
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethi ... cover.html
I am thinking the same thing.
GO SKINS GO!!
Irn-Bru wrote:FiveWidez wrote:1) Gibbs has proven how bad a personnel guy he is
2) Gibbs also has a track record for winning but we see what has happened to that
3) Where did I say it was Jesus' fault? Please point that out to me. I am saying MAYBE Gibbs feels a bond with Brunell and it is clouding his judgment
I think you want things both ways. Since Gibbs has been back, our personnel management has been great until a few of our moves this year (namely, AA and Carter, as well as a lack of bulking up the secondary). If you're going to point to a "proven" track record of bad personnel management, you'll need to reach much farther back. . .but you don't want anyone to do that for the track record of winning.
Gibbs showed as recently as last year that he can win (still not buying it as a 'fluke'). Considering how every phase of our team has undergone frustrations this year, I'm waiting to see if he can help assemble a cohesive unit by the end of the year before I pass any judgements on it. 2006 is a work in progress, and it alone won't swing my opinion one way or the other until I can get the whole picture.
As for personnel. Cmon man. Antonio Pierce? Smoot? Forget the players we gave money to that suck this year. What about the players we let go. Monumental mistakes.
-
- ---
- Posts: 18887
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
- Location: AJT
- Contact:
Mursilis wrote:Why not mention Ramsey?
He had a chance and blew it. Even though it was a short one.
Mursilis wrote:Is he an NFL starter?

Mursilis wrote:No, I'm not arguing that; at this point, I think the evidence is clear that he's not very good.
Exaclty.
Mursilis wrote:Yet Gibbs yanked him the first chance he got.
Pat yanked himself by having a mediocre training camp. A horrible preseason. And looking bad in the opener.
Mursilis wrote:It doesn't matter that Brunell was OK last year;
Brunell did great last year considering he only had one viable WR. I stuck up for MB05 and I will continue to do so.
Mursilis wrote:If you were Campbell (a young QB), how much confidence in your coach would you have?
You're reaching. How about you ask him and we'll find out. But considering Gibbs drafted him specifically, Id assume he has faith in his coach.
Mursilis wrote:As long as Brunell is on the roster, Gibbs is going to look for the first chance to put him in there.
Once Brunell is done, he's done imo but neither of us know the future.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
- DCGloryYears828791
- Hog
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 5:37 pm
- Location: DC
- Contact:
Chris Luva Luva wrote::lol: So know its Jesus's fault we're losing? Talk about grasping for straws. Gibbs got Brunell because he liked him as a QB and as a person. You dont have to be a Christian to be a good person and if Brunell wasn't a Christian he still would have gotten the job.
Gibbs believes and likes Brunell a lot and has a track record of sticking with his QB's till the bitter end. He'll show JC that same confidence when he struggles as a rookie QB. Dont bother mentioning Patrick because he sucks and continues to suck in NY.
Amen. No pun intended.
Dec. 31, 1972
NFC Championship Game at RFK Stadium
W, 26-3
"Just remember this. Forty men together can't lose." George Allen
NFC Championship Game at RFK Stadium
W, 26-3
"Just remember this. Forty men together can't lose." George Allen
Irn-Bru wrote: I think you want things both ways. Since Gibbs has been back, our personnel management has been great until a few of our moves this year (namely, AA and Carter, as well as a lack of bulking up the secondary).
I think you missed a few other examples. That whole Duckett affair has yet to play out, but it's not looking so smart so far. Not to mention Campbell - is he good? Bad? Who knows? Since we're not playing him, and he amounts to three picks, those picks are a waste until he actually does something on the field. Sure, he may be great in the future, but he could be a huge bust, and the cost would then be steep. Either way, since he's not been allowed to do anything so far, he might as well be a bust. Finally, there's the players we've allowed to leave - while I'm not sure about Smoot, it appears at least the losses of Pierce and Clark weren't so smart. It'll be interesting to see if we can keep some of our other stars, if we develop this reputation of caring more about other team's players than our own.
-
- ---
- Posts: 18887
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
- Location: AJT
- Contact:
FiveWidez wrote:19-22....wait for the end of the 2006 season to pass judgments? How many games do you need?
So what, look how long Cowher has been in Pitt. Look how long it took him to win a championship. Give it some time and hopefully our front office will learn to give it some time also in our selection process of players.
Again none of you people have a viable candidate to replace Gibbs?
What if the new coach whats to get rid of Williams and Saunders?
What if they dont like CP and

So its going to take another 3-4 years for them to get their system in place and they still might not succeed.
You guys ask for stuff and dont even know what you're asking for.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
-
- ---
- Posts: 18887
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
- Location: AJT
- Contact:
FiveWidez wrote:The fact that you guys have give MB nicknames like MBO4 and MB05 proves his inconsistency has gone on long enough.
The fact that you fail to reply to the many points people have posted in rebuttle to your beliefs shows inconsistency in your ability to prove your point.

The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!