Dangerfield wrote: Was it "Ever-Loving" or "Freaking" ?
Although posting this response is probably undermining my credibility, I seek not to inflame nor circumvent any rules on this board. I just find that the moderators and staff are unable to have any type of continuity in what gets called out here. How is it possible that a thread talking about a sperm bank and having sticky feet whilst visiting one is up all day today in an 'open forum' of this board, and this is an available emoticon:

, yet you 'edit' my post?
Honestly, I don't need a response, this is a rhetorical question. I understand how many 'trolls' are out ther looking to make trouble. I just don't like getting called out for using profanity when I had no intention to do so. As for the 3 consecutive posts at midnight MST, well I guess I was having a little too much fun that night. Go Skins....
You seek not to flame the rules of the board? Really? You mean while you're questioning the rules of the board and the enforcement of them?
What were you seeking then?
I suppose you weren't trying to be flammatory when you said, "This is a new low for you overly ambitious moderators" either right?
How do you know what 'continuity' is? You've been a member since the last day of July... continuous with what? The last 60 days? It's irrelevant. The rules have always been the same and enforced in the exact same manner. Do certain things squeak through? sure. But for the most part... 99.9% of the time... if you post profanity whether it has characters or blanks or not... it's going to get moderated or you are going to be asked to edit your own post. There's no lack of continuity at all... if someone posts profanity or some semblance of it... they're going to hear about it. How do you know what PMs go back and forth between mods and members anyway? How do you know what profanity has or hasn't been addressed?
Please check out this new post. You're going to want to read it before you continue your membership here:
http://www.the-hogs.net/forum/viewtopic. ... 984#275984
It's not directed at you, but it does apply.
For the record... from the admin's stand-point... Irn-Bru had every right to moderate the post. He certainly did nothing to the post that hijacked the thread like your subsequent posts did. We do everything we can to maintain the PG environment. It's very hard for us to curb topic discussions as far as content goes... we're not here to censor people... only to make them post in the appropriate forum within the guidelines provided. So I'm not about to start moving topics to Smack because the topic was 'controversial' or immoral. Nor do we have a
rule against such things. And for the most part... people are smart enough to post threads that might get heated, or that are inappropriate, in the smack forum... not in a public forum.
But we
can enforce profanity, and we
do have a rule about that... and so the moderator is strictly working within the guidelines provided for him/them.
The smiley thing is ridiculous. We have a smack forum too. Just because the board 'has something' doesn't make it okay to do something without prejudice. We HOPE that people will use some discretion with the few smieys available that might be less than PG... they're great fun to use in the smack forum. But I can take them away if they're making it hard for you to discern the rules. I have no way of making certain smileys work only in certain forums or I would.
Sean Taylor was one of a kind, may he rest in peace.