Joe Jurivicous

John Manfreda · Post by **John Manfreda** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:46 pm

I am on the sign Joe Jurivicous band wagon now. I think he would complement Santana the best. What about u all

air_hog · Post by **air_hog** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:52 pm

Well, I think if we want to improve our WR corps, we should trade Carlos Rogers for Mike Williams :oops:

...

Skeletor · Post by **Skeletor** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:57 pm

I am on the sign Joe Jurivicous band wagon now. I think he would complement Santana the best. What about u all

I don't think any of us would complement Santana the best...

Hog Heaven · Post by **Hog Heaven** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 5:41 pm

I'd still prefer Randle El, but Jurevicous is my second chioce. I know Joe would give us a possession guy, but Randle El gives us versatility and is far younger.

ii7-V7 · Post by **ii7-V7** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 6:15 pm

air_hog wrote:Well, I think if we want to improve our WR corps, we should trade Carlos Rogers for Mike Williams ...

Why? Because M. Williams has done so well in the league?

Chad

stevejrfan78 · Post by **stevejrfan78** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:30 pm

I've always liked jerevicous he comes up with really big plays when he needs to. I would be extemely happy to see him in burgundy and gold next year.

MarcusBeNimble · Post by **MarcusBeNimble** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 7:33 pm

although signing jurevicious would be great for the team, i can honestly say that i dont think he's the guy the redskins need to be a unquestionably legit threat to the top 2 or 3 teams in the afc....

My 2 cents

welch · Post by **welch** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 8:21 pm

I like Jurevicius (or however he spells his name), but is he fast enough?

Yes, you're right...I keep wishing for another Art Monk. Unrealistic. But Jurevicius seems more like a pass-catching H-back.

Main question: is he fast enough to shake a defender and draw coverage from Moss?

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:03 pm

welch wrote:I like Jurevicius (or however he spells his name), but is he fast enough?

Yes, you're right...I keep wishing for another Art Monk. Unrealistic. But Jurevicius seems more like a pass-catching H-back.

Main question: is he fast enough to shake a defender and draw coverage from Moss?

He kept getting open against us...

Hog Heaven · Post by **Hog Heaven** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:06 pm

If he doesn't draw coverage from Moss, He'll keep the chains moving for us; however, if Randle El didn't darw some saftey help he could really burn a guy in man-man coverage.

leatherhead 377 · Post by **leatherhead 377** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:26 pm

A nice #3, possession receiver, but Wayne is what we really need!

sch1977 · Post by **sch1977** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:32 pm

leatherhead 377 wrote:A nice #3, possession receiver, but Wayne is what we really need!

No way we go after Wayne, we don't need him. We already have a number 1 in Moss, we need a complimentary WR!

daddywatson · Post by **daddywatson** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:47 pm

My fellow brethren, I hate to be the bearer of bad news(God knows I hate it)but if the CBA doesn't proceed, we are in a hell of a bind. Even if we do get our high profile players to renegotiate contracts, with the 30% rule and etc., heading into an uncapped year, we might be kind of strapped.
I'm not quite sure but, '07 might look pretty cool.

milkbone · Post by **milkbone** » Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:56 pm

Jerevicious is on the end of his career. Although we probably can't afford him, we need someone younger and faster like El. Patten is alreedy in his 30's, and Thrash is geting up there in football years as well.

floridaskinsfan · Post by **floridaskinsfan** » Tue Feb 21, 2006 8:41 am

I don't want Joey J. He has been good lately but we need someone a little younger. I hope we don't sign him unless it is a #3 receiver. We still don't know how Patten is going to come back but I think he needs to be the #3 guy and we get a solid #2 guy. I don't think Joey J is that guy.

skinsRin · Post by **skinsRin** » Tue Feb 21, 2006 9:38 am

floridaskinsfan wrote:I don't want Joey J. He has been good lately but we need someone a little younger. I hope we don't sign him unless it is a #3 receiver. We still don't know how Patten is going to come back but I think he needs to be the #3 guy and we get a solid #2 guy. I don't think Joey J is that guy.

Nice to see your back Floridaskinsfan

haven't seen you in a while. Your right about JJ, I said the same thing earlier, to old and his best years are behind him.

MyrtleBeachRedskin · Post by **MyrtleBeachRedskin** » Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:39 pm

I think right now we are a now or never team. This team is being assembled to win now and allow Campbell to have some veterans around him. 2 years max with Joe still at the helm. So JJ is the best option. We did not have a Wr that could shake coverage against Seattle. We need someone who can catch the ball from anywhere. PLus we can afford him.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Wed Feb 22, 2006 7:23 am

MyrtleBeachRedskin wrote:I think right now we are a now or never team. This team is being assembled to win now and allow Campbell to have some veterans around him. 2 years max with Joe still at the helm. So JJ is the best option. We did not have a Wr that could shake coverage against Seattle. We need someone who can catch the ball from anywhere. PLus we can afford him.

I wouldn't call us a "win now" team. We're definately a lot younger/diverse than we were when we definately had a "win now" attidue. I think we have a decent mix of young/old/inbetween.

skinsRin · Post by **skinsRin** » Wed Feb 22, 2006 9:26 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
MyrtleBeachRedskin wrote:I think right now we are a now or never team. This team is being assembled to win now and allow Campbell to have some veterans around him. 2 years max with Joe still at the helm. So JJ is the best option. We did not have a Wr that could shake coverage against Seattle. We need someone who can catch the ball from anywhere. PLus we can afford him.

I wouldn't call us a "win now" team. We're definately a lot younger/diverse than we were when we definately had a "win now" attidue. I think we have a decent mix of young/old/inbetween.

Yes, Chris we are not a win it all right now team. we have a bunch of young guys and vets. Thats what it takes to win now and to build for the future. We have a team that can be great for a number of years and if they are smart about it they can keep the winning tradition going this time around. Synder learned from his mistake back in the late 90's buying old players to win right away.

redskinz4ever · Post by **redskinz4ever** » Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:15 pm

not to sure about double jj as a #2 ,i just want someone who will get open ....CATCH THE BALL and get us that play when all other outlets are covered who that will be i don't know.

old-timer · Post by **old-timer** » Thu Feb 23, 2006 11:17 am

we'll be having fits with the salary cap this year. We need cheap, short term solutions. Going forward, Gibbs will fix the cap mess and then he can put in place llong term solutions. This year we want to at least make it to the NFC Championship and a good, tough, inexpensive, possession receiver like Jurevicius fills the bill. Ditto for a pass-rushing DE. We need a specialist who is effective, and regardless of how short his career is likely to be here, it's all we can afford. One of Gibb's special talents is to find the player with just the right fit for his needs, a player that everyone else passes on because of some major flaw.

Champsturf · Post by **Champsturf** » Thu Feb 23, 2006 2:41 pm

I think Rod Gardner is available for league minimum. :shock:

crazyhorse1 · Post by **crazyhorse1** » Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:30 am

Champsturf wrote:I think Rod Gardner is available for league minimum.

Sounds like a joke, should be a joke; but I'm listening to a lot of suggestions that are no better than this one. Face it, Patten was not an upgrade over Gardner; Thrash and Taylor are utterly incapable of putting up Gardner numbers; so, probably, is JJ.
If we can't do considerably better than JJ, Patten, etc. we ought to go back to Gardner at the league minimum and save some cap dollars.

SkinsFanInHawai'i · Post by **SkinsFanInHawai'i** » Fri Feb 24, 2006 1:45 am

Bringing Gardner back would be slightly less stupid than Philly bringing back TO.

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Fri Feb 24, 2006 2:17 am

SkinsFanInHawai'i wrote:Bringing Gardner back would be slightly less stupid than Philly bringing back TO.

Yeah but if we are going to rob the Jets again I would consider bringing back LC (after he has reworked his contract.

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Joe Jurivicous

Joe Jurivicous

joe jurevicius seems like a good fit