JPM36 wrote:hatsOFF2gibbs wrote:Yeah, actually it does. BUT there are two differences:
Ramsey is not DBrees, at least not yet
Their veteran must have been 10 times better than Brunell, even if he didn't play at all
Other than that, I'm looking forward to the season!
Well thats kindof the point. BEFORE last season Drew Brees was Patrick Ramsey.
actually, that is not true. ramsey is currently a MUCH better quarterback than brees was at the end of 2003. the stats back that up:
BREES 2003: in 11 starts, threw 11 TDs and 15 INTs, for a total of 2108 yards and a 67.5 passer rating.
RAMSEY 2004: in 7 starts, threw 8 TDs and 6 INTs, for a total of 1313 yards and an 85.6 passer rating.
in fact, in ramsey's 2nd season (2003) he was already better than brees in his 3rd season:
RAMSEY 2003: in 11 starts, threw 14 TDs and 9 INTs, for a total of 2166 yards and a 75.8 passer rating.
***
ALL RAMSEY HATERS, PLEASE NOTE THAT IN HIS STARTS, RAMSEY HAS THROWN ABOUT 32% MORE TDs (22) THAN INTERCEPTIONS (15). *** so i really don't want to hear any more crap about his INTs, thanks. that is not based in a complete understanding of reality. he threw a bunch of picks earlier in the season when he had to go in and come from way behind. DUH.
anyways, the point is comparing ramsey to brees is actually an insult to ramsey. ramsey is much more talented than brees, and will continue to become a better QB every season. and within the next year or two he will become experienced enough that he will rocket past brees.