NFL Network-Playbook NFC East Draft show
- SkinsHead56
- Hog
- Posts: 805
- youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 7:03 pm
- Location: Santa Barbara,CA
NFL Network-Playbook NFC East Draft show
The guys on Playbook were saying that the Skins are just a step away from the playoffs. Ramsey is the key, if he can pull a Drew Brees.....watchout. They predicted the Skins will want to draft offense but will in a way be forced to draft for D buy the fact that A.Jones, or another top flight corner will be available at #9. I agree with that, if the right WR is there get him, if not go CB.
In memorium Sean Taylor 1983-2007 R.I.P.
Long live the Legend of "Meast".
Long live the Legend of "Meast".
- hailskins666
- aka Evil Hog
- Posts: 6481
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 9:01 am
- Location: South of Heaven, trying to hit a toilet on shrooms
- Contact:
-
- #######
- Posts: 7225
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
- Location: Washington D.C.
yes, sean taylor definitley helped this team more than Kellen would have, besides we picked up a great talent that fits into the history and tradition of the redskins....unselfish...willing to do whatever it takes.
I strongly believe you take the best player available.
I strongly believe you take the best player available.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
___________________________
- SkinsLaVar
- Hog
- Posts: 1190
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 12:45 pm
- Location: L.A.
I saw this on playbook too. The question was, out of the three 6-10 teams in the NFC East , (Redskins, Giants, Cowpukes) , which team do you see making the wild card next season. They all chose the Skins. They said the Redskins Defense is up there, Ramsey just has to step it up.
1.5.2. Happy Passover! 

-
- ---
- Posts: 18887
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
- Location: AJT
- Contact:
I slightly disagree that this offenses troubles lay not entirely on Ramsey. I don't care how well Ramsey does we need a running game. He played alright last year towards the end, but I think if our running game was a given instead of a probable we would have been incredible.
Portis is ready willing and able!
Portis is ready willing and able!
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
-
- the 'mudge
- Posts: 16632
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
- Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
He played alright last year towards the end, but I think if our running game was a given instead of a probable we would have been incredible.
Now, Chris, you're a smart fella. You know that the running game only gets better with a credible passing threat. It spreads the defense, prevents them from loading the box, opening up options, especially for an elusive runner like Portis.
If Ramsey demonstrates an ability to pick apart a defensive backfield, Portis is the immediate winner.
I think Playbook got it dead-on right.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
-
- Hog
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:58 pm
- Location: Somewhere in Central Asia
The only problem with our running game is goal line situations.
Otherwise, I believe our offense had issues with the gameclock managment (an adjustment for Gibbs' motion in his plays), passing accuracy - a Brunell issue, and route running.
Hopefully the speedy receivers will get open better this year. Even the threat will open up holes for Portis, especially with Jansen back...
QB's can only do but so much. The get both too much credit and to much criticism, but hey, they are paid for it!
Otherwise, I believe our offense had issues with the gameclock managment (an adjustment for Gibbs' motion in his plays), passing accuracy - a Brunell issue, and route running.
Hopefully the speedy receivers will get open better this year. Even the threat will open up holes for Portis, especially with Jansen back...
QB's can only do but so much. The get both too much credit and to much criticism, but hey, they are paid for it!
- SO. CAL. SKIN DUDE
- piggie
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 11:48 pm
I hate to bag on my boy P-Ram, but the guy was just horrible last year, as a video clip from NFL Playbook showed. It showed Ramsey making the wrong read and throwing the ball to his outlet receiver, who had no chance at the 1st down... then we punted (this took place a lot of the time while Patrick was at QB).
If I'm a D coordinator, I game plan for P-Ram to beat me again and again, and by design stack box w/eight men to stop Portis. So I agree w/NFL network, it's wholly up to P-Ram to step it up this year and become a constant threat to keep the D honest.
If I'm a D coordinator, I game plan for P-Ram to beat me again and again, and by design stack box w/eight men to stop Portis. So I agree w/NFL network, it's wholly up to P-Ram to step it up this year and become a constant threat to keep the D honest.
LET'S GET'ER ON GO!!
- Hog Heaven
- Hog
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:00 pm
- Location: Harrisonburg/ Virginia Beach
A lot of you guys are saying we should take the best player availiable. I agree with this, and know Gibbs believes in it too. My questions is, since many people believe D. Johnson (LB Tx.) is the most talented player in the draft, should we take him if he falls to us? I would only consider it if the top WRs are gone, but idk... what do ya'll think?
Romans 1:11 "For I wish that I myself were cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers..." Paul