If Brown signs....this is our Defense...

spudstr04 · Post by **spudstr04** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:01 pm

RE- Brown/ Daniels/ Warner
DT- Salavea/ Noble
DT- Griffin/ Boschetti
LE- Wynn/ Daniels/ Evans
WLB- Arrington/ Clemons/ Campbell
MLB- Marshall/ Barrow/ Smith
SLB- Washington/ Clemons/ Campbell
CB- Springs/ Wilds/ Lott/ Jimoh
CB- Harris/ Wilds/ Lott/ Jimoh
SS- Bowen/ Clark/ Lott
FS- Taylor/ Lott

Still have the possible addition of a CB in round one depending on the way the picks fall from 1-8. If we draft a guy he may compete with Harris as a starter, but it's very possible he'd play the nickel and work his way in.

GoSkins · Post by **GoSkins** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:12 pm

Awesome lineup and I agree with your assessment about our CB situation.

spudstr04 · Post by **spudstr04** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:13 pm

Yeah, I love what our D looks like, as long as we get some fresher legs in the secondary we'll be ok!

doctordrew · Post by **doctordrew** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:22 pm

Don't forget that Prioleau is about to sign with the skins. Where would he fall in? I think he would be ahead of Lott and Clark on the depth chart.

GoSkins · Post by **GoSkins** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:39 pm

We have 2 DBs that we did not offer contracts; Dennis and Franz (who just signed with the Packers). So those 2 positions (really ST positions) are what Giibs and Co are filling.

spudstr04 · Post by **spudstr04** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 2:06 pm

doctordrew wrote:Don't forget that Prioleau is about to sign with the skins. Where would he fall in? I think he would be ahead of Lott and Clark on the depth chart.

I don't think that he would be ahead of Clark, Clark played excellent last year, when we lost bowen and lott....i even checked prioleau's stats, he's not that great...

C'fieldSkin · Post by **C'fieldSkin** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 2:40 pm

I think either Lott or Prioleau will be a nickel or dime player kind of like what the Patriots do in dime situations. They like to play three safetys, gives them more options on the blitz. I think the speed Prioleau brings will be interesting GW's defense.

riggofan · Post by **riggofan** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 2:53 pm

Man, I really hope Brown signs and becomes a monster for the skins. It would be great to nab somebody else's former first round draft pick at a steal and see him flourish.

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:45 pm

It is not even definite that Bowen will be ahead of Clark...he had a very serious injury...and Clark played extremely well.

At Virginia we had an All American safety, Anthony Poindexter, who had the same injury and he was never the same...he's a coach at UVA now.

redskindave · Post by **redskindave** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:01 pm

Man I like the way the Defense looks, If we sign Courtney Brown and with the pick we get in the draft, Our Defense should be a beast HTTR

Irn-Bru · Post by **Irn-Bru** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 4:33 pm

Between a (healthy) Daniels and Wynn, I'd take Daniels to start. Other than that, I like the lineup, though the linebacker position doesn't seem as solid to me as what we had last year. If Barrow's healthy, I'd also like to see him slated as the starter (but if Marshal can prove that he can play there, the more power to him).

Hogfather · Post by **Hogfather** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:30 pm

With the way our Defense is panning out through FA signings. I wouldn't be surprised to see them take a CB in the first or second round and then use all of the remaining picks soley for offensive players.

Great Natale · Post by **Great Natale** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:49 pm

[quote="FanfromAnnapolis"]Between a (healthy) Daniels and Wynn, I'd take Daniels to start. Other than that, I like the lineup, though the linebacker position doesn't seem as solid to me as what we had last year. If Barrow's healthy, I'd also like to see him slated as the starter (but if Marshal can prove that he can play there, the more power to him).[/quote]

How can our LB be less solid this year. Arrington is back! Are you saying a Pierce/Marshall combination that we had last year is better than a Arrington/Marshall (Barrow) combination??????

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:51 pm

This defense looks menancing....

Why does this organization do this to us every year? I mean... We promise ourselves not to get excited because its the same stuff over and over, but they just do the right things to get us drooling every year.

Hogfather · Post by **Hogfather** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:02 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:This defense looks menancing....

Why does this organization do this to us every year? I mean... We promise ourselves not to get excited because its the same stuff over and over, but they just do the right things to get us drooling every year.

Yes they certainly know how to push our buttons and make us drool =P~

However I'm putting a stop to it, I'm going to join DA "droolers Anonymous " :-#

washington53 · Post by **washington53** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:04 pm

I love the way it looks... we will be #1 next year and you watch

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:16 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:This defense looks menancing....

Why does this organization do this to us every year? I mean... We promise ourselves not to get excited because its the same stuff over and over, but they just do the right things to get us drooling every year.

This year the organization (defensive coaching staff) hasn't changed for the first time in half a decade.
It might be ok to drool :wink:

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 11:32 pm

Hogfather wrote:With the way our Defense is panning out through FA signings. I wouldn't be surprised to see them take a CB in the first or second round and then use all of the remaining picks soley for offensive players.

If they have that group on draft day IMO they will go with a WR or Miller if the receiver(s) are not there!

That is a very good start for GW and they can add some younger guys later.

tcwest10 · Post by **tcwest10** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 10:52 am

I don't mind saying it here...with most of the same names you see here, we were projected to be one of the bottom-feeding defenses last year for the lack of a stud pass-rush DE.
We're really only "minus" Smoot. Pierce was never slated to be a starter.
It's looking about par for the course, comparatively.

DeathByLinebacker#56 · Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:44 pm

Just having Williams for another year provides much needed stability to our D. Furthermore, we should be able to top 50 sacks this year if Brown comes aboard. :twisted:

spudstr04 · Post by **spudstr04** » Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:16 pm

1niksder wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:This defense looks menancing....

Why does this organization do this to us every year? I mean... We promise ourselves not to get excited because its the same stuff over and over, but they just do the right things to get us drooling every year.

This year the organization (defensive coaching staff) hasn't changed for the first time in half a decade.
It might be ok to drool

yeah for once, we haven't lost or gottena new coach