SMOOTY IS GONE?

SKINSLOVER · Post by **SKINSLOVER** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 8:59 pm

with ravens signing rolle i think the chiefs will make a run for fred smoot and they are going to throw a lot of money at him. give me your opinion

RobSkins1 · Post by **RobSkins1** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:05 pm

they could but they only have 2.7 mill of cap room, and now we have around 2 mill in cap room. I think what they put down we can put up every penny they do if we realy want Smoot back.

John Manfreda · Post by **John Manfreda** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:05 pm

NO they are going to go after Ty Law.

VASkin27 · Post by **VASkin27** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:15 pm

If the Chiefs were going to throw a lot of money anywhere, it would have been earlier and probably towards Rolle or Law. But the possibility is definitely still there.

SKINSLOVER · Post by **SKINSLOVER** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:26 pm

If the Chiefs were going to throw a lot of money anywhere, it would have been earlier and probably towards Rolle or Law. But the possibility is definitely still there.

the only reason why they didnt sign rolle is beacase of health concerns so shut up

chicosbailbond · Post by **chicosbailbond** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:46 pm

why isn't smoot gone already?????

he isn't top notch.. a banged up ty law is better than him... law will go to kc... surtain will end up somewhere and smoot will end up with us...

we will have some extra money b/c we will cut chad morton and some other dead weight guys....

i think we may end up with alot more for gardner than we think... Minnesota is going to overpay for him... not in money but with draft picks... they don't know how to manage a draft... they missed their pick two years in a row.... Mike Tice is a moron....

Scooter · Post by **Scooter** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:53 pm

There is value to staying in DC beyond football. His agent is too stupid to realize it though. Smoot could pick up an extra six-figures for 20 years by hangning around DC. He's got game and should be prepared to kindly accept $10,000,000.00 in his bank account tomorrow. Will his greed outweigh his common sense? I honestly don't think so - c'mon Smooty, sign the deal and let's win a Super Bowl!

Skinna Mob · Post by **Skinna Mob** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:56 pm

chicosbailbond wrote:i think we may end up with alot more for gardner than we think... Minnesota is going to overpay for him... not in money but with draft picks... they don't know how to manage a draft... they missed their pick two years in a row.... Mike Tice is a moron....

Ayo...I may be a bit drunk (its my bday) but I am over here laughing so hard at the "Mike Tice is a Moron" comment...and the image of that dorky ass pencil he has behind his ear.

Ill holla...off to get twisted more ...and hopefully bump into some strange :lol:

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:19 pm

SKINSLOVER wrote:so shut up

Easy there tiger.

reggiebrooks4life · Post by **reggiebrooks4life** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:23 pm

lets not get our undaroos in a bunch skinslover

tcwest10 · Post by **tcwest10** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 11:02 pm

Nice way to drag people into your thread with that topic title, too.

njskinsfan · Post by **njskinsfan** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 11:03 pm

Don't worry. We recycled Springs and Harris and we will find an able replacement for Smoot when he bolts for the bling-bling somewhere else.

.... and good riddance.

I'd take Ty Law and a two year contract.

DieselFan · Post by **DieselFan** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 11:56 pm

SKINSLOVER wrote:the only reason why they didnt sign rolle is beacase of health concerns so shut up

Back off boys...we've got a live one here. Skinslover...you're wound tighter than a top. He just gave you an honest opinion and wasn't crapping your thread, dude. Time to take some manners or anger management classes --I'm not sure which.

Cooley47 · Post by **Cooley47** » Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:02 am

I am in shock that Rolle will not be wearing Burgundy and Gold next year.......what do we do now?

BringThePain! · Post by **BringThePain!** » Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:10 am

SKINSLOVER wrote:with ravens signing rolle i think the chiefs will make a run for fred smoot and they are going to throw a lot of money at him. give me your opinion

first... please be respectful, and refrain from telling other members to shut up, especially after you asked for everyones opinion

... and others, there's no need to lynch the guy or atleast do it in smack...

now to answer your question:

I believe the Ravens signed Rolle with an $11 mil signing bonus... I would think that the Chiefs nor the Redskins didn't offer him that much...and that's why he signed with the Ravens....

I can't see them trying to sign Rolle, which looked like who they wanted first... and then turning around and offering Smoot more money.... but I'm not in the FO of the Chiefs, so who knows how it will really play out...

Cooley47 · Post by **Cooley47** » Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:11 am

calm down Skinslover don't spaz

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:38 am

Baxter left the Ravens for a $10.5 million SB and Rolle joined the Ravens for $11 million SB .. 6 year deals both should make less than a million this year. That would put their cap number around $2.75-$3 million. We could clear that for Smoot.

Smoot knows he is atleast a notch below Rolle and he got $11M he might want to take the ten while it's still on the table

BringThePain! · Post by **BringThePain!** » Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:41 am

1niksder wrote:Smoot knows he is atleast a notch below Rolle and he got $11M he might want to take the ten while it's still on the table

especially since suitors are dropping like flys...

die cowboys die · Post by **die cowboys die** » Tue Mar 08, 2005 1:05 am

idunno, i just get that vibe in The Force that smoot is going to the chiefs. it would be the smart move for them... here's hoping they don't make the smart move.

Brandon777 · Post by **Brandon777** » Tue Mar 08, 2005 1:40 am

I wish Smoot would just take the 10 million we offered him and just chill. He needs to stay here.

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

SMOOTY IS GONE?

SMOOTY IS GONE?

Re: SMOOTY IS GONE?