"Washington's need at corner is based on free agency, as their own Fred Smoot has stated vehemently that he does not wish to return."
Wow, that's the first I've heard that, thought I'd share it.

Turning down a $10 million offer doesn't really scream loyalty to your team.
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:Yeah, but...
When you compare it to the Danny's profit, which equals at least 10x as much, a couple more million in bonus money seems like pennies.
BossHog wrote:
what on earth does that have to do with it?
I just love how sports owners are the only businessmen on the planet who aren't allowed to realize a retrun on thir investment. Danny paid 800 MILLION dollars for the right to earn that profit.
... and being that his constant knock is HOW much he spends... how can he win with commentary like this? You think the guy's an idiot for paying Arrington, but you want him to pony up WHATEVER for Smoot?
Whatever.
I'm not one that begrudges Snyder for doing what ANY good business person would do... try earn his investment back.
... and that has NOTHING to do with whether or not Snyder should pony up the cash for Smoot... he shouldn't... Fred ain't worth that much.
... and if he does... in two years we'll be listening to your rants about how Fred ain't worth all that and how much you hate the guy and blah, blah, blah... just like your tiresome L.A rants.
... oh wait a minute... now I see your motivation for the big contract signing.... eternal whining.
As i see it... this is all posturing until something is done. if Smoot leaves after a $10M offer was made... we'll know he wasn't that core a Redskin to begin with or he'd have taken the FAIR contract to stay with his 'beloved' team. if Fred stays and everything gets worked out... it'll all be water under the bridge and just considered nothing more than bargaining tactics.