surtain for gardner

BigSkinNig · Post by **BigSkinNig** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:05 pm

maybe itll happen with smoot gone and people about chambers far fetched but just putting it out there

REDEEMEDSKIN · Post by **REDEEMEDSKIN** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:24 pm

Welcome to the board! Interesting name there.

I'd prefer getting a draft pick for Gardner, rather than a free agent. We need to build for the future through the draft. We're gonna sign free agents anyway, why waste the Gardner trade on another. We're short on draft picks.

EasyMoney · Post by **EasyMoney** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:32 pm

Too many wide receivers in Miami already.

redskincity · Post by **redskincity** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:33 pm

BigSkinNig wrote:maybe itll happen with smoot gone and people about chambers far fetched but just putting it out there

This may be a possibility.

Mike · Post by **Mike** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 7:48 pm

Maimi does not need to spend any more money on recievers...David Boston was out all season with an injury, so i believe they are fine at that WR spot.

SkinsHead56 · Post by **SkinsHead56** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:01 pm

Mike wrote:Maimi does not need to spend any more money on recievers...David Boston was out all season with an injury, so i believe they are fine at that WR spot.

I forgot the Fish have that 'roided garbage on their team. Maybe they will want Gardner after all.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:10 pm

Gardner for Boston?

Mike · Post by **Mike** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:11 pm

I would do that in a sec

SkinsHead56 · Post by **SkinsHead56** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:10 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:Gardner for Boston?

Mike wrote:I would do that in a sec

I'm not sure why this is even being mentioned (except as a joke... a very bad joke). If Gibbs would not go for Moss then forgetaboutit. Boston put the crap in crap. This guy is a terrible, non team player, over sized, underachiving, bad 'tude, 'roided, legal problem having, overpaid garbage bin. :-#

ok I'll stop now.

washington53 · Post by **washington53** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:40 pm

i would do that in a second too... But Miami wouldnt bc they have enough recievers

Clinton Portis · Post by **Clinton Portis** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:53 pm

Boston was a success back when he wuz with the Cards...

Then he started doing steroids and that really changed him for the worst. Now he's a slow reciever, with serious water retention problems in his muscles. He is always in legal trouble too...good pickup THEN...not good now.

THEN

G GS No Yards Avg Lg TD 20+ 40+ FD
2000 Arizona Cardinals 16 16 71 1156 16.3 70 7 17 7 48
2001 Arizona Cardinals 16 15 98 1598 16.3 61 8 28 7 72

NOW

2003 San Diego Chargers 14 14 70 880 12.6 46 7 13 2 42

Or at least recently. His numbers decreased in San Diego, and he'll never be as good as he was in 00-01.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:58 pm

*continues to stir the pot*

So Boston for Gardner isn't a good deal? :lol:

Clinton Portis · Post by **Clinton Portis** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:59 pm

How about sign Givens, and ask for a pick for Gardner from the Pats or Oakland.

tcwest10 · Post by **tcwest10** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:02 pm

Boston is a complete physical specimen...until you get to the ankles. His ankles are like a little kid's wrists.
He's also egocentric. Not that this is uncommon, but definitely not something you look for when coupled with the injury issues.
Maybe if his Dad comes with him as part of the deal....
We could have an official in our pocket, just like Dallas does !!

Ramsey's Hog · Post by **Ramsey's Hog** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:03 pm

It would probably be better if we were able to pick up a draft pick. We sold our draft picks for other players in seasons past and it hasn't panned out that well, so let's try the opposite.

Redskins4Life · Post by **Redskins4Life** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:04 pm

If we could get Surtain for Gardner I would go crazy... Surtain is a pro bowl caliber corner whos still young for Gardner who is good IMO but will not fetch us anything better. I like this deal. As for Boston, dont even say something stupid like that

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:13 pm

Redskins4Life wrote:If we could get Surtain for Gardner I would go crazy... Surtain is a pro bowl caliber corner whos still young for Gardner who is good IMO but will not fetch us anything better. I like this deal. As for Boston, dont even say something stupid like that

Im going to ask for Boss to include [sarcasm][/sarcsm] tags on this board.

chicosbailbond · Post by **chicosbailbond** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:41 pm

they were talking on the radio down here (miami) today that surtain for priest holmes... is the most likely scenario..

Miami is 17 million over the cap... If we are going to pluck anyone from their roster it should be Jason Taylor... He would make our D pretty damn nasty... with both of our safeties healthy and lavar back with Jason Taylor... that is almost 85 bears... or 89 eagles....

Redskin in Canada · Post by **Redskin in Canada** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 12:24 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:Gardner for Boston?

YIKES!!!

ArmyHog · Post by **ArmyHog** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:40 am

I saw this on ESPN.com yesterday and thought about posting this very suggestion.

I like the idea, but Surtain already has said he wants top notch pay. If we can't afford Smoot, then I think it will be hard to get Surtain.

Although it would be great to see.......
********************************************

they were talking on the radio down here (miami) today that surtain for priest holmes... is the most likely scenario..

If I were Miami, I would go after Larry Johnson. He made a statement this year, and is much younger. Holmes also has some injury issues. My 2 cents

Malicious · Post by **Malicious** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 3:24 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:*continues to stir the pot*

So Boston for Gardner isn't a good deal?

I for one wouldn't mind seeing this trade. Couldn't see it realistically happening.

coachKarl · Post by **coachKarl** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:15 am

Surtain will want the big bucks, we might as well pay Smoot .

trey53 · Post by **trey53** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 12:11 pm

Ooo! Ooo! Yeah, let's get Boston!

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/3371390

Nuff said.

chicosbailbond · Post by **chicosbailbond** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:59 pm

ArmyHog wrote:I saw this on ESPN.com yesterday and thought about posting this very suggestion.

I like the idea, but Surtain already has said he wants top notch pay. If we can't afford Smoot, then I think it will be hard to get Surtain.

Although it would be great to see.......
********************************************
they were talking on the radio down here (miami) today that surtain for priest holmes... is the most likely scenario..

If I were Miami, I would go after Larry Johnson. He made a statement this year, and is much younger. Holmes also has some injury issues.

If I were Miami I would want Johnson too... but you are correct that he made a statement... and that is why they are willing to deal priest...

Surtain is better than smoot... we can pay either one... the question is... is it worth it..???

cover corners aren't worth all of that money... isn't that what we were saying last year when champ left... we can just get by with a second tier guy...

Cooley47 · Post by **Cooley47** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 9:29 pm

lets just hope we keep Smooty

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

surtain for gardner

surtain for gardner

Re: surtain for gardner

Boston 4 RG