Page 1 of 1
Question about Eagles game...
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 9:58 pm
by 1fan4ramsey
Who do we have that is going to cover T.O.? I think that game may be ugly. Can our defense really expect to slow down their high powered offense? Comments please, but do your best to "keep it real".
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:06 pm
by Redskin Stouff
Ummmm...we have Smoot, Springs and Taylor. Enough said.
Posted: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:12 pm
by hatsOFF2gibbs
Redskin Stouff wrote:Ummmm...we have Smoot, Springs and Taylor. Enough said.
Hey Redskin Stouff, alright so that means we have three players on T.O. What about the other recievers on the team? They might not be as good but their still great players. Our defense is going to have a rough game....even though the best part of our team IS the Defense.
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:04 am
by ArmyHog
I think they should put Springs on him. He played against TO the most, since they were both in the NFC West. They will probably have to double cover and use other schemes throughout the game though.
Hey....the Eagles are good, but they are human. They have to have a bad game at some point. Hopefully that point is on Nov 21st

Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:26 am
by 1niksder
ArmyHog wrote:They will probably have to double cover and use other schemes throughout the game though.
Williams will come up with something. I don't think T.O. can beat us by himself so we'll have to focus on the whole Iggles offense
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:52 am
by ANT7088
Not that this means ANYTHING, but here's what happened in 2002 (the last time we played them).
http://www.jt-sw.com/football/boxes/ind ... -03-was-sf
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 4:48 am
by SkinsLaVar
Haha, forget that. Think about what will happen to Brunell after Kearse knocks him, lol. Man o man.
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 5:59 am
by HEROHAMO
The real question is can our offense score. Im not worried about T.O. . I think we can contain him im not scared of there running game either. Our defense has proven theyre good. A real big test for our defense comes next Sunday against Farve and Ahman Green .
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:05 am
by DEHog
It's not about covering T.O. it's about getting pressure on NcNabb and breaking up their timimg. Let's just hope the game means something! We have 3 other games before we face them.
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:46 am
by Justice Hog
I'm with DEHog. Also, not focusing on T.O., you're gonna have to stop Westbrook first to beat this team. If you can stop Westbrook, you have a chance. If you can't, you're toast.
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:16 pm
by SkinsLaVar
Guess what... Im watching the Iggles vs. Browns game right now, and the Browns were up 24 to 21. It's the Browns.......
If they can stay in the game like that is really amazing. My prediction for the Iggles is they go to the superbowl..and lose....ahahah.
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 3:34 pm
by ANT7088
SkinsLaVar wrote:Guess what... Im watching the Iggles vs. Browns game right now, and the Browns were up 24 to 21. It's the Browns.......
If they can stay in the game like that is really amazing. My prediction for the Iggles is they go to the superbowl..and lose....ahahah.
I know the Browns didn't score 31 points against us!
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 4:21 pm
by DEHog
The Browns ran the ball well!! That will help keep T.O. quiet. The did a good job on him, but the balls he caught were big
Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2004 5:24 pm
by NikiH
See I think the key is somewhat what DE said. The Eagles are expecting us to focus on TO. And yes we have to make sure Smoot, Springs, and Taylor are ready for him BUT we need to cover their other receivers as well. 9 times out of 10 today it was lack of coverage on their other receivers that lead to big gains. I want to see TO get burned big time. Smoot or Taylor incept it right in his face. Or just see him laid out once or twice would work too but besides that we have to focus on everyone on their offense as a play maker, including McNabb.