Question about Eagles game...

1fan4ramsey · Post by **1fan4ramsey** » Sat Oct 23, 2004 9:58 pm

Who do we have that is going to cover T.O.? I think that game may be ugly. Can our defense really expect to slow down their high powered offense? Comments please, but do your best to "keep it real".

Redskin Stouff · Post by **Redskin Stouff** » Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:06 pm

Ummmm...we have Smoot, Springs and Taylor. Enough said.

hatsOFF2gibbs · Post by **hatsOFF2gibbs** » Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:12 pm

Redskin Stouff wrote:Ummmm...we have Smoot, Springs and Taylor. Enough said.

Hey Redskin Stouff, alright so that means we have three players on T.O. What about the other recievers on the team? They might not be as good but their still great players. Our defense is going to have a rough game....even though the best part of our team IS the Defense.

ArmyHog · Post by **ArmyHog** » Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:04 am

I think they should put Springs on him. He played against TO the most, since they were both in the NFC West. They will probably have to double cover and use other schemes throughout the game though.

Hey....the Eagles are good, but they are human. They have to have a bad game at some point. Hopefully that point is on Nov 21st :lol:

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:26 am

ArmyHog wrote:They will probably have to double cover and use other schemes throughout the game though.

Williams will come up with something. I don't think T.O. can beat us by himself so we'll have to focus on the whole Iggles offense

ANT7088 · Post by **ANT7088** » Sun Oct 24, 2004 12:52 am

Not that this means ANYTHING, but here's what happened in 2002 (the last time we played them).

http://www.jt-sw.com/football/boxes/ind ... -03-was-sf

SkinsLaVar · Post by **SkinsLaVar** » Sun Oct 24, 2004 4:48 am

Haha, forget that. Think about what will happen to Brunell after Kearse knocks him, lol. Man o man.

HEROHAMO · Post by **HEROHAMO** » Sun Oct 24, 2004 5:59 am

The real question is can our offense score. Im not worried about T.O. . I think we can contain him im not scared of there running game either. Our defense has proven theyre good. A real big test for our defense comes next Sunday against Farve and Ahman Green .

DEHog · Post by **DEHog** » Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:05 am

It's not about covering T.O. it's about getting pressure on NcNabb and breaking up their timimg. Let's just hope the game means something! We have 3 other games before we face them.

Justice Hog · Post by **Justice Hog** » Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:46 am

I'm with DEHog. Also, not focusing on T.O., you're gonna have to stop Westbrook first to beat this team. If you can stop Westbrook, you have a chance. If you can't, you're toast.

SkinsLaVar · Post by **SkinsLaVar** » Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:16 pm

Guess what... Im watching the Iggles vs. Browns game right now, and the Browns were up 24 to 21. It's the Browns.......
If they can stay in the game like that is really amazing. My prediction for the Iggles is they go to the superbowl..and lose....ahahah.

ANT7088 · Post by **ANT7088** » Sun Oct 24, 2004 3:34 pm

SkinsLaVar wrote:Guess what... Im watching the Iggles vs. Browns game right now, and the Browns were up 24 to 21. It's the Browns.......
If they can stay in the game like that is really amazing. My prediction for the Iggles is they go to the superbowl..and lose....ahahah.

I know the Browns didn't score 31 points against us!

DEHog · Post by **DEHog** » Sun Oct 24, 2004 4:21 pm

The Browns ran the ball well!! That will help keep T.O. quiet. The did a good job on him, but the balls he caught were big

NikiH · Post by **NikiH** » Sun Oct 24, 2004 5:24 pm

See I think the key is somewhat what DE said. The Eagles are expecting us to focus on TO. And yes we have to make sure Smoot, Springs, and Taylor are ready for him BUT we need to cover their other receivers as well. 9 times out of 10 today it was lack of coverage on their other receivers that lead to big gains. I want to see TO get burned big time. Smoot or Taylor incept it right in his face. Or just see him laid out once or twice would work too but besides that we have to focus on everyone on their offense as a play maker, including McNabb.