philly great, giants terrible?

Talk about the AFC, NFC, the NFL Draft, College Football... anything football that has no Washington Football Team relevance.
Post Reply
User avatar
tnathan
piggie
Posts: 142
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:55 am
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

philly great, giants terrible?

Post by tnathan »

for those of you who saw the philly/giants game on sunday, i was wondering... do you think the eagles are that good, or the giants are just that bad? maybe both... it was one of those games you somehow hope both teams lose, but the eagles looked pretty scary. what's the verdict? were the eagles that good? or was it just a good show against a lousy giants team?
"rarely does a man have greater heroes than the champions of his youth."

-mike wilbon

go you nats
Justice Hog
Pursuer of Justice
Pursuer of Justice
Posts: 5809
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 8:38 pm
Location: Newark, Delaware

Post by Justice Hog »

This does not belong in "Hog Wash". I'm moving it.
Fran Farren
"Justice Hog"

Newark, DE

“God didn't give us a spirit that is timid but one that is powerful, loving and controlled.” 2 Timothy 1:7
User avatar
Redskin Stouff
Hog
Posts: 450
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 9:16 am
Location: London, Ontario

Post by Redskin Stouff »

Probably a combination of both. Not only do the Giants stink, they hate Coughlin.

I'll reserve judgement on the Eagals until after they play Minny on Monday Night.
How many more sleeps until next season?
General Failure
Hog
Posts: 3472
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Croydon, PA
Contact:

Post by General Failure »

After the first couple of drives when things started picking up I thought the scoring would never end.
I got your number. I steal your thunder. I got your mother's maiden name tattooed on my arm.
User avatar
cvillehog
Hog
Posts: 5220
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 3:03 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by cvillehog »

I'd have to say both.

It will be interesting to see them against the Vikes.
User avatar
MURP
swine
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:01 pm
Location: Philly
Contact:

Post by MURP »

I would also say both. ;)
1, 2, barbeque.
redskinz4ever
******
******
Posts: 2630
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 3:55 pm
Location: charlotte nc

Post by redskinz4ever »

PHILLY's offense looks good, thier "D" i'm not to sure about. stopping the run ?? and if they face a team with good wideouts can they match up with them ???
the N.Y. GIANTS they're "D" is weak and looks like we will be able to really get after who ever is the Q.B. !! we will be tested this week on our run "D" !!
TOUCHDOWN .....WASHINGTON REDSKINS !!!!
General Failure
Hog
Posts: 3472
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Croydon, PA
Contact:

Post by General Failure »

Most people consider Toomer and Hilliard to be a good pair of receivers. They may not be Carter and Moss or Burres and Ward, but they're good.
I got your number. I steal your thunder. I got your mother's maiden name tattooed on my arm.
User avatar
Redskin Stouff
Hog
Posts: 450
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 9:16 am
Location: London, Ontario

Post by Redskin Stouff »

General Failure wrote:Most people consider Toomer and Hilliard to be a good pair of receivers. They may not be Carter and Moss or Burres and Ward, but they're good.


Yeah they're not bad, they just don't have anyone to throw them the ball.
How many more sleeps until next season?
User avatar
tnathan
piggie
Posts: 142
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:55 am
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Post by tnathan »

sorry about putting it in the wrong forum... thanks for moving it justice.

seems like the eagles looked just plain good, though. i am excited for the vikes game... all my friends are eagles fans, and i'm sick and tired of hearing about them. i need them smashed into the ground. good to see the giants and cowboys looking so weak, though.
"rarely does a man have greater heroes than the champions of his youth."

-mike wilbon

go you nats
Justice Hog
Pursuer of Justice
Pursuer of Justice
Posts: 5809
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 8:38 pm
Location: Newark, Delaware

Post by Justice Hog »

People. For the love of God. Philly played the GIANTS, not the Packers!!!!

Beating the Giants does not make them GREAT!!!

McNabb/T.O. hooked up several times because of blown coverages. Yes, they were talented enough to exploit those blown assignments...but T.O. didn't have a ton of yards. He just had 3 TDs...which made him look better.

The Eagles still have a suspect run defense. When matched up against a team with a better defense and a good running game, my guess is that Philly is going down.

Philly is good.....but I'm far from convinced that they're anywhere near "GREAT".
Fran Farren
"Justice Hog"

Newark, DE

“God didn't give us a spirit that is timid but one that is powerful, loving and controlled.” 2 Timothy 1:7
cj17
piglet
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 4:13 pm

Post by cj17 »

The Giants look bad, but their offensive line wasn't nearly as bad as I thought they would look. But they don't appear to have as much talent as the other three teams in the division, and should find themselves with a record similar to last years.

Philly was scary. McNabb and Owens are already on the same page. Don't just pass that off to "blown coverages" and "not having a ton of yards" they ran their offense to perfection. They didn't do anything to stop run defense questions, but it actually looked better than last years. Remember Tiki got 75 meaningless yards on that long run.

I think they are still the team to beat.

Gotta love the Skins early season schedule.
General Failure
Hog
Posts: 3472
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Croydon, PA
Contact:

Post by General Failure »

cj17 wrote:Philly was scary. McNabb and Owens are already on the same page.


I had to ask myself when the Giants decided to let the Washington Generals play for them.
I got your number. I steal your thunder. I got your mother's maiden name tattooed on my arm.
Post Reply