Al and John Can't Add

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:38 pm

What in the world were they talking about Denver going for 2 so that there wouldn't be a tie?

Do they need better producers or something?

ROTFL

Jake · Post by **Jake** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:41 pm

I think they said so that there WOULD be a tie, not so that there WOULDN'T be a tie.

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 10:56 pm

Jake wrote:I think they said so that there WOULD be a tie, not so that there WOULDN'T be a tie.

That may be what they MEANT, but that's sure not what I heard. Of course, Madden says the opposite of what he means all the time.

Wish I had TiVo, I'd go back and check. hehe.

What do you guys think of the new sideline reporter? She sounds just a little bit like she doesn't really know who these people she is talking to/about are. :lol:

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:16 pm

Either way they were right there was a tie and then there wasn't

Justice Hog · Post by **Justice Hog** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:30 pm

My question is...if there was a tie at the end of regulation....would they play into sudden death O.T.? As a coach, I wouldn't want to do that....in a preseason game.

RedskinsFreak · Post by **RedskinsFreak** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:40 pm

Justice Hog wrote:My question is...if there was a tie at the end of regulation....would they play into sudden death O.T.? As a coach, I wouldn't want to do that....in a preseason game.

Yes, there would be OT.

A lot of times in preseason, if a team is down 7 late and scores a TD, the coach will go ahead and go for 2 just to make sure there would be no OT.

cvillehog · Post by **cvillehog** » Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:42 pm

1niksder wrote:Either way they were right there was a tie and then there wasn't

LOL