The Redskins odds for winning it all

Skins2WinITall · Post by **Skins2WinITall** » Thu Jul 29, 2004 2:15 pm

I was intrested in find out what the odds were for the skins to win it all this year and searched Monkey

Bet.com and found them to be at 16-1. They also have the skins at a 2-1 to win the NFC east which I believe is very possible this year. If you want to check out all the odds for the skins this year I have provided the link.[url]www. Monkey

bet.com[/url]

mookie · Post by **mookie** » Fri Jul 30, 2004 11:17 pm

16 to 1 might be worth the bet. I mean, what's $100 among friends. The NFC East bet is interesting too, although you gotta go with the Eagles with TO.

This is going to be a great year for us. Joe will get us the wildcard and if we're lucky we'll do some damage in the playoffs.

Justice Hog · Post by **Justice Hog** » Fri Jul 30, 2004 11:19 pm

Welcome to the boards both of you. I hope you enjoy your stay(s). I think 16-1 are fair odds to win it all; however, to win the NFC East...I think the odds should be something closer to 4-1. The Skins have a chance to take the East, don't get me wrong; however, they'll still have to beat up the bully on the block...those Eagles.

ChiliPalmer · Post by **ChiliPalmer** » Sat Jul 31, 2004 3:38 am

I hate to say it, but there's more than just Philly. I'm as optimistic as the next guy, but even with Gibbs back, the Skins still haven't gotten the Dallas monkey (more like King Kong) off their backs. First things first....

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Sat Jul 31, 2004 4:23 am

I know what you mean Chili. Even when we are the better team, which is almost always, it seems that we find some way to play down against Dallas. That being said, Joe usually was able to beat them in the big games, and Dallas' record last year was not indicative of the quality of their team. They had a very easy schedule, and got some extremely lucky breaks. I'm looking for them to fall back to earth this season (sub .500).

mookie · Post by **mookie** » Sat Jul 31, 2004 11:47 pm

I don't think the cowboys are that good. They consistently make draft mistakes and the tuna can only do so much with vinnie t and quincy carter.

94heritagesofttail · Post by **94heritagesofttail** » Tue Aug 03, 2004 12:49 am

Vegas odds at MGM Grand were 12-1 the last week of June, Have my ticket hanging on the fridge

gambit187 · Post by **gambit187** » Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:05 am

JSPB22 wrote:I know what you mean Chili. Even when we are the better team, which is almost always, it seems that we find some way to play down against Dallas. That being said, Joe usually was able to beat them in the big games, and Dallas' record last year was not indicative of the quality of their team. They had a very easy schedule, and got some extremely lucky breaks. I'm looking for them to fall back to earth this season (sub .500).

Would u please quiet it with that easy schedule B.S. We cannt help it if that is the excuse you use to justify you teams 5-11 record, if we had an easy schedule then you guys had one too.

So what is you excuse. to quote Ike Turner "You got more excuses then a nicca going to jail"

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:16 am

gambit187 wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:I know what you mean Chili. Even when we are the better team, which is almost always, it seems that we find some way to play down against Dallas. That being said, Joe usually was able to beat them in the big games, and Dallas' record last year was not indicative of the quality of their team. They had a very easy schedule, and got some extremely lucky breaks. I'm looking for them to fall back to earth this season (sub .500).

Would u please quiet it with that easy schedule B.S. We cannt help it if that is the excuse you use to justify you teams 5-11 record, if we had an easy schedule then you guys had one too.

So what is you excuse. to quote Ike Turner "You got more excuses then a nicca going to jail"

I'm not saying we had a hard schedule, although coming off a 7-9 season it was tougher than Dallas' coming off a 5-11. The 'Skins lost 6 games by a touchdown or less. We sucked last year, but you, and all the pundits, are looking at Dallas' season last year through rose colored glasses. I'm sure the Tuna did help with team morale a little, but you had an easy schedule, and caught some lucky breaks. Face it, your team is not that good.

gambit187 · Post by **gambit187** » Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:21 am

JSPB22 wrote:
gambit187 wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:I know what you mean Chili. Even when we are the better team, which is almost always, it seems that we find some way to play down against Dallas. That being said, Joe usually was able to beat them in the big games, and Dallas' record last year was not indicative of the quality of their team. They had a very easy schedule, and got some extremely lucky breaks. I'm looking for them to fall back to earth this season (sub .500).

Would u please quiet it with that easy schedule B.S. We cannt help it if that is the excuse you use to justify you teams 5-11 record, if we had an easy schedule then you guys had one too.

So since we are not that good, and since the Skins had virtually the same schedule as we did. That means the Skins are aweful . Oh and what about the last 12 of 13 games we whooped yall in so you saying that you team stinks. We got yall beat hands down at dayum near all positions.

So what is you excuse. to quote Ike Turner "You got more excuses then a nicca going to jail"

I'm not saying we had a hard schedule, although coming off a 7-9 season it was tougher than Dallas' coming off a 5-11. The 'Skins lost 6 games by a touchdown or less. We sucked last year, but you, and all the pundits, are looking at Dallas' season last year through rose colored glasses. I'm sure the Tuna did help with team morale a little, but you had an easy schedule, and caught some lucky breaks. Face it, your team is not that good.

Deadskins · Post by **Deadskins** » Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:05 am

gambit187 wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
gambit187 wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:I know what you mean Chili. Even when we are the better team, which is almost always, it seems that we find some way to play down against Dallas. That being said, Joe usually was able to beat them in the big games, and Dallas' record last year was not indicative of the quality of their team. They had a very easy schedule, and got some extremely lucky breaks. I'm looking for them to fall back to earth this season (sub .500).

Would u please quiet it with that easy schedule B.S. We cannt help it if that is the excuse you use to justify you teams 5-11 record, if we had an easy schedule then you guys had one too.

So since we are not that good, and since the Skins had virtually the same schedule as we did. That means the Skins are aweful . Oh and what about the last 12 of 13 games we whooped yall in so you saying that you team stinks. We got yall beat hands down at dayum near all positions.

So what is you excuse. to quote Ike Turner "You got more excuses then a nicca going to jail"

I'm not saying we had a hard schedule, although coming off a 7-9 season it was tougher than Dallas' coming off a 5-11. The 'Skins lost 6 games by a touchdown or less. We sucked last year, but you, and all the pundits, are looking at Dallas' season last year through rose colored glasses. I'm sure the Tuna did help with team morale a little, but you had an easy schedule, and caught some lucky breaks. Face it, your team is not that good.

Damn, I left Gambit speechless. What a coup!

gambit187 · Post by **gambit187** » Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:10 am

JSPB22 wrote:
gambit187 wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
gambit187 wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:I know what you mean Chili. Even when we are the better team, which is almost always, it seems that we find some way to play down against Dallas. That being said, Joe usually was able to beat them in the big games, and Dallas' record last year was not indicative of the quality of their team. They had a very easy schedule, and got some extremely lucky breaks. I'm looking for them to fall back to earth this season (sub .500).

Would u please quiet it with that easy schedule B.S. We cannt help it if that is the excuse you use to justify you teams 5-11 record, if we had an easy schedule then you guys had one too.

So since we are not that good, and since the Skins had virtually the same schedule as we did. That means the Skins are aweful . Oh and what about the last 12 of 13 games we whooped yall in so you saying that you team stinks. We got yall beat hands down at dayum near all positions.

So what is you excuse. to quote Ike Turner "You got more excuses then a nicca going to jail"

I'm not saying we had a hard schedule, although coming off a 7-9 season it was tougher than Dallas' coming off a 5-11. The 'Skins lost 6 games by a touchdown or less. We sucked last year, but you, and all the pundits, are looking at Dallas' season last year through rose colored glasses. I'm sure the Tuna did help with team morale a little, but you had an easy schedule, and caught some lucky breaks. Face it, your team is not that good.

Damn, I left Gambit speechless. What a coup!

No you just keep harping on the same thing that makes you feel good deep down inside. OH THE COWBOYS AINT THAT GOOD THEY JUST HAD AN EASY SCHEDULE. But in fact we are that good better then the Redskins whom we have beating 12 outta the last 13 times. If we are not that good , then you guys must be scraping the bottom of the barrel. Since we OWN YALL.