Page 1 of 1
Who should start at QB POLL
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 6:55 pm
by RedskinsFanForever56
Who do u want to start? AND WHY
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 7:34 pm
by Justice Hog
I voted for Brunell because I think his QB skills are much more developed than Ramsey's at the present time. I think P-Ram can learn from him and, in time, will take over the starting QB job. For now, however, this will be Marky-Mark's fun bunch.
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:12 pm
by doeslammer
Justice Hog, I agree with you, let Ramsey watch a little and with Brunell and his age, Ramsey will be in there in no time. And leading us in a year or two, to another superbowl.
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:47 pm
by hailskins666
ramsey. i like to pull for the underdog.
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 8:49 pm
by DEHog
OK for th 17th time it's Brunell!!
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 9:21 pm
by hogred
First Year Stats QBs
Brett Favre #4
Year Team 1992 Green Bay Packers
games- 15
yards-3227
18 tds
13 ints
Mark Brunell #8
year Team
1995 Jacksonville Jaguars
games-13
yards-2168
15-tds
7-ints
Patrick Ramsey #11
Year Team
2003 Washington Redskins
games-11
yards-2166
tds-14
ints-9
Take a look at Ramsey's yards in 11 games 1st year to Brunnel's yards in 13 games 1st year. I say give Ramsey the start.
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 9:47 pm
by Steve Spurrier III
I can't believe you just said Ramsey should start based on Brunell's 1995 stats. Unbelievable...
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 10:09 pm
by oafusp
Who I want is Ramsey, who I think....I don't know.
I do know that Ramsey will give Brunell a run for his money. I give credit to Brunell for being very sportsman like about the "competition" but you can see that Brunell is a very sure of himself...deffinately confident, boarderline arrogant.
I think Ramsey will surprise Brunell, the staff, and even himself. Ramsey is very competitive and I am looking forward to seeing if he bombs when he tries to step up his game. If he can raise his game to a higher level this summer then he is ready...I think.
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 10:11 pm
by Ramsey2Coles1180
I voted for Patrick Ramsey because he deserves to get the start. After last year and all of those beatings that he took, he deserves to at least show everyone what he has.
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 10:36 pm
by Skins56
i voted for brunell because i think ramsey could learn a lot more from watching him play. but ill take whoever gibbs decides becuase it will be the right guy for the job.
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2004 11:45 pm
by Wysocki
Brunell, because Joe and I aren't comfortable with Patrick running a pro offense right now.
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2004 7:53 am
by hogred
Steve Spurrier III
I can't believe you just said Ramsey should start based on Brunell's 1995 stats
Why not I already have seen Ramsey play and I have seen Brunell play. If you look at the system Ramsey played in , with no protection , and he still produced numbers close to brunnel's 1st year, that with Brunell in a better system. Seems like a no brainer. Look at it this way after Brunnel's first year alot of people in Jacksonville thought they had a QB for the future.(which he was) I think we have our QB for now and the future in Ramsey...
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2004 8:17 am
by JPFair
I think we're really beating a dead horse with this question. First of all, it doesn't matter what WE think now. What matters is what Joe Gibbs thinks after he sees the QB's (including Hasselbeck and Gibran whatshisface) at camp.
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2004 9:59 am
by JonC56
Steve Spurrier III wrote:I can't believe you just said Ramsey should start based on Brunell's 1995 stats. Unbelievable...
Actually it is pretty beleivable. Im not saying I agree with it but it makes perfect sense. You cant see the
logic in it by comparing there first year stats. We all know Brunell is going to to start the year at quarterback, but the job will be there for the taking by ramsey.
In the majority of your posts when you diagree with someone you like to belittle them instead of just stating your opinion as to why you disagree with them. Show a little class.
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2004 10:13 am
by Steve Spurrier III
Jon, I'm sorry I hurt your feelings in the Smack Forum. Seriously, I apologize. Let's move on.
Hogred, I apologize for not explaining myself.
Look, what Brunell did in 1995 has nothing to do with how he will preform this season. If you want to compare his 95 stats to Ramsey's 2002 stats and say that since they are similar then Ramsey could have a future similar to Brunell's, fine. I see the logic in that.
I agree that Ramsey has a great future. But that has nothing to do with who should start this season. Brunell is one of the most efficent passers in NFL history, and that is why he is going to start...
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2004 10:22 am
by JonC56
Steve Spurrier III wrote:Jon, I'm sorry I hurt your feelings in the Smack Forum. Seriously, I apologize. Let's move on.
Hogred, I apologize for not explaining myself.
Look, what Brunell did in 1995 has nothing to do with how he will preform this season. If you want to compare his 95 stats to Ramsey's 2002 stats and say that since they are similar then Ramsey could have a future similar to Brunell's, fine. I see the logic in that.
I agree that Ramsey has a great future. But that has nothing to do with who should start this season. Brunell is one of the most efficent passers in NFL history, and that is why he is going to start...
Now that wasnt so hard, was it?
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2004 10:29 am
by Steve Spurrier III
You have no idea...