The Washington Redskins have inquired about obtaining the San Diego Chargers' No. 1 overall pick, though the conversation is believed to have been more about being comprehensive than serious.
What do you think ant? Will we trade samuels or keep him? I want to keep him. I believe he will turn into something great under Gibbs. Gibbs will make him work harder and concentrate on his tasks at hand.
skinsfan1 wrote:What do you think ant? Will we trade samuels or keep him? I want to keep him. I believe he will turn into something great under Gibbs. Gibbs will make him work harder and concentrate on his tasks at hand.
Keep him, I think once he starts playing and see's what Gibbs is going to bring to this team, he will re-neg. Otherwise next year he may miss something very special
i say keep him because all we do when we get rid of him is fill his hole with a pick instead of filling other holes, like our dline, safety, tight end, etc.
Portrayed as a key factor in the original Gallery-Samuels report was Samuels' contract situation. However, any potential dispute appears to have been overstated. Samuels, according to sources, has been willing to rework his contract this offseason or discuss a long-term extension next offseason; his only objection is to discuss a long-term extension this offseason
So he has been talking about negotiating his contract. This is great news. We better keep him. It will be a waste of a pick if we get rid of him.
Redskins Rule ..I agree it makes no sense to trade up and move Samuels now he will be more of a force this years because he knows he HAS to reno his contract if he wants to stay a redskin and I really think he wants to be here.
Heres a quote that should end the SD trade rumor
Said director of player personnel Vinny Cerrato: "We have no ammunition to trade. There's nobody we would want to get at No. 1. We're content at No. 5 or moving down."
BUT IT IS 1 WEEK FROM DRAFT DAY and Front Offices will say anything this time of year
But we won't be Drafting in the top 15 in 2005