Redskins, Williams Sued By Former Player Over Alleged Bounty

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Post Reply
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Redskins, Williams Sued By Former Player Over Alleged Bounty

Post by 1niksder »

Redskins, Williams Sued By Former Player Over Alleged Bounty Scandal
The Washington Redskins are being sued by former NFL linebacker Barrett Green in connection to an alleged bounty program run by then defensive coordinator Gregg Williams in 2004.

In the suit, which also names Williams and former tight end Robert Royal as defendants, Green claims a hits-for-cash program was responsible for a career-ending knee injury he suffered in 2004 during a game against the Redskins while playing for the New York Giants.

According to sports law expert Gabe Feldman the lawsuit states: “Redskins coaches directed their players to disregard criminal (and) civil laws, as well as NFL rules, to intentionally injure opponents.”

The Redskins declined to comment Monday on the lawsuit.


:shock: :? :shock:

OK, I'm going to need some help from one of our lawyer type board members on this one.

First of all, Barrett Green played the following week and was on an NFL roster until the start of the 2006 season, yet claims his career was ended by a hit he took in 2004.

Next problem I have with this is if he was cut due to some type of injury, there would have been a injury settlement of some kind or he would have been waived with a injured designation.

My last issue with this suit is the fact that the player that's being accused of injuring Green was a freaking TE. Granted he play a little on the defensive side of the ball but that was mostly with the Buffalo Bills with Gregg Williams still on Washington's staff, in fact in 2004 at the time in question Royal was the starting TE for the Skins and had limited to no defensive duties.


The fact that the NFL cleared the Skins of any wrong-doing under GW is also a point of interest.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
tribeofjudah
tribe
tribe
Posts: 7075
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:02 pm
Location: SURF CITY, HB, CALI *** Occasionally flying into a SUPERNOVA

Post by tribeofjudah »

We live is a litigious society....that's the extent of my law knowledge.
Proverbs 27:17 As iron sharpens iron,
so one person sharpens another.
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Post by Irn-Bru »

It's a reach for sure. Very hard to separate these issues out with that kind of murky playing and injury history before and after the game against the Skins.
User avatar
emoses14
Hog
Posts: 2320
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:36 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Post by emoses14 »

Laugh out loud test?

Probably passes. So no Rule 11 violation here.

Surviving Summary Judgement/Motion to dismiss?

Probably not.

Emoses14, Esq.
I know he got a pretty good zip on the ball. He has a quick release. . . once I seen a coupla' throws, I was just like 'Yeah, he's that dude.'"

-Santana Moss on Our QB
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

1)How long is the statute of limitations?
2) Royal played TE. Williams didn't coach him.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
cvillehog
Hog
Posts: 5220
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 3:03 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by cvillehog »

Maybe hoping it will be cheaper for the team to settle than defend?
Post Reply