
I'm kinda wondering how many guys we keep at each position grouping. List with rough guesses and 53 total. Discuss/Fix?
OL 9
WR 7
TE 3
RB 3
QB 3
DL 8
LB 9
DB 8
ST 3
Whattathink?
DarthMonk
No FB?DarthMonk wrote:I think RGIII will make the team. I also like London Fletcher's chances.![]()
I'm kinda wondering how many guys we keep at each position grouping. List with rough guesses and 53 total. Discuss/Fix?
OL 9
WR 7
TE 3
RB 3
QB 3
DL 8
LB 9
DB 8
ST 3
Whattathink?
DarthMonk
I think we may keep 4 TEs, and definitely 4 RBs (counting FBs), but I'm not sure where those extra 2 players are conimg out of your numbers. We have to keep an extra QB this year, so that already has us down one spot. I don't see us keeping 9 LBs. Probably closer to 8, and maybe only 7. Probably only 7 DL, too.DarthMonk wrote:I think RGIII will make the team. I also like London Fletcher's chances.![]()
I'm kinda wondering how many guys we keep at each position grouping. List with rough guesses and 53 total. Discuss/Fix?
OL 9
WR 7
TE 3
RB 3
QB 3
DL 8
LB 9
DB 8
ST 3
Whattathink?
DarthMonk
Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.
Doesn't FB fall under RB?skinsfan#33 wrote:No FB?DarthMonk wrote:I think RGIII will make the team. I also like London Fletcher's chances.![]()
I'm kinda wondering how many guys we keep at each position grouping. List with rough guesses and 53 total. Discuss/Fix?
OL 9
WR 7
TE 3
RB 3
QB 3
DL 8
LB 9
DB 8
ST 3
Whattathink?
DarthMonk
D Young might not like that!
Maybe he doubles as a TE. That's one of the things that makes this so interesting. BB is ST and WR. We have a TE/WR hybrid and a LB who can do most anything. Versatile guys might have an edge. They might allow us to keep someone who won't start but we don't want to let go. BTW - Gano is a very good punter. That's an edge.Red_One43 wrote:^ Are you accounting for the FB in your three RBs?
It will be interesting - like the 8 WRs - excuse me - 7 WRs and a Return specialist that e kept last year.DarthMonk wrote:Maybe he doubles as a TE. That's one of the things that makes this so interesting. BB is ST and WR. We have a TE/WR hybrid and a LB who can do most anything. Versatile guys might have an edge. They might allow us to keep someone who won't start but we don't want to let go. BTW - Gano is a very good punter. That's an edge.Red_One43 wrote:^ Are you accounting for the FB in your three RBs?
DarthMonk
I like this. Quite a menu, BTW:1niksder wrote:6 WR's
3 QB's
3 RB's
1 FB
2 TE's
9 OL
2 "Other"
26 of 53 spots for the offense leaves 24 spots for the D
I think the players listed below have roster spots, and it's up to them to keep them, some may end up on the PS.
WRs
Garcon
Morgan
Hankerson
Moss
Robinson
Armstrong
QBs
RGIII
Cousins
Grossman
RBs
Helu
Hightower
Royster
FB
Young
TEs
Davis
Cooley
Will play more than one of the positions listed above
Morris (FB & RB)
Paul (FB & TE may also see time at WR)
OL
Williams
Lichtensteiger
Montgomery
Chester
Brown
Gettis
LeRibeye
Smith
Hurt
I know someone who thought it was inksider for years!riggofan wrote:Oh my god, THANK YOU. I finally get the name.Chris Luva Luva wrote:I really enjoyed Redskin1's mock.
riggofan wrote:Man I don't know what I thought, but it was driving me nuts.cowboykillerzRED wrote:Smh @ riggo... U thought he was the ever cool ni(c)ks(t)er? Lol
OL 9DarthMonk wrote:I think RGIII will make the team. I also like London Fletcher's chances.![]()
I'm kinda wondering how many guys we keep at each position grouping. List with rough guesses and 53 total. Discuss/Fix?
OL 9
WR 7
TE 3
RB 3
QB 3
DL 8
LB 9
DB 8
ST 3
Whattathink?
DarthMonk
You could (i wouldn't, but you could) put then under RB but with only three I assumed you had just forgotten about FB.DarthMonk wrote:Doesn't FB fall under RB?skinsfan#33 wrote:No FB?DarthMonk wrote:I think RGIII will make the team. I also like London Fletcher's chances.![]()
I'm kinda wondering how many guys we keep at each position grouping. List with rough guesses and 53 total. Discuss/Fix?
OL 9
WR 7
TE 3
RB 3
QB 3
DL 8
LB 9
DB 8
ST 3
Whattathink?
DarthMonk
D Young might not like that!