I didn't do so to start a fire or fan any flames and for all I know it will die with few views and no replies.
I've been a Redskin fan for a long time - not as long as some of you but probably longer than most. I'm old enough to remember riots in DC in the '60s. I remember seeing signs like this in my neighborhood.

I remember no black QBs. I remember RFK and the team truly being Washington's. It really wasn't that long ago.
Indy and we are about to choose "the face of the franchise."
I think one of the reasons Indy/Luck Washington/RGIII is best is due to race.
Washington DC is currently 51% black, 38% white, and 11% other. I am sure if I went downtown right now and asked 1,000 people at random who they'd want as our QB, RGIII would win and one of the main reasons, voiced or not, for many, would be his race.
Indy is currently 69% white, 25% black, and 6% other. I am also sure my random poll there would produce Luck as the winner and that race would be a main reason.
I'm not saying this to stir up controversy. I don't think it's wrong to lean one way or another based on race. I'm a Blackfoot and would have loved to have seen us land Bradford (Cherokee) a few years ago. One of the reasons I would prefer RGIII is I think he'd be a more appropriate "face of the franchise" given the history of this area as I have experienced it.
I'd be interested to hear other thoughts. I'm not going to argue unless it's in self-defense after being outright attacked.
Anybody want to chime in?
DarthMonk