Special Monday 10-pack: Winners and losers in free agency

Talk about the AFC, NFC, the NFL Draft, College Football... anything football that has no Washington Football Team relevance.
Post Reply
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Special Monday 10-pack: Winners and losers in free agency

Post by 1niksder »

Only six days ago, the free-agent market opened. One of the biggest classes of veteran players, with some of the biggest names, landed on the market.

Apart from the Peyton chase, much of the dust has settled.

And so now we’re required by the laws of football analysis to tell you who won and who lost, even though we won’t really know the answer until they start playing games.


Which, you know, will feature winners and losers


11. Loser/Winner: Redskins.

I know. I said there would be only 10 winners and losers. But I didn’t say anything about the team that lands in both categories.

The $36 million in unexpected cap charges for treated the uncapped year too literally makes the Redskins losers. Their refusal to shrug their shoulders when they did nothing wrong makes them winners.

Their ability to still find a way to spend money makes them winners. Their decision to give so much money to the likes of Pierre Garçon and Josh Morgan makes them losers.

Their willingness to move up to No. 2 and get the franchise’s first true franchise quarterback since Sammy Baugh possibly will make them winners. Mortgaging the future by giving up three first-round draft picks and a second-round pick possibly will make them losers.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

Oh goodness gracious, get off the darned fence.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

Top 10... 5 winners 5 loser,... So how can there be a number eleven?

How can number eleven be a winner and a loser?
Shouldn't #11 (if a top 10 is going to have one) it be either a winner or loser?
If it's both... isn't that 12?

Let's get them off the fence...

The $36 million in unexpected cap charges for treated the uncapped year too literally makes the Redskins losers. Their refusal to shrug their shoulders when they did nothing wrong makes them winners.


They got hit with a penalty that is still fluid yet they have proceeded into free agency like always, in fact being the most active on day one and more active than most since the start of the "cap space spending" aka free agency, refusing to shrug their shoulders made the penalty moot and the Redskins activity shows they aren't loser because of the cap penalty.

Their ability to still find a way to spend money makes them winners. Their decision to give so much money to the likes of Pierre Garçon and Josh Morgan makes them losers.


OK we've covered spending money... They're winners because they spend money but were losers a minute ago because they have no cap space.

Who is historically proven to be the lose when they project what the Redskins can do as it pertains to the Redskins? I can't think of any time EVER. Even most of this is based on a year with NO salary cap
Morgan and Garçon are less than $8M combined on the 2012 cap... how many teams upgraded their WR roster and paid less for a WR on a multi year deal. The Skins got two for less than the price of one (two up and comers not retreads)

Can't say they are losers here either.

Their willingness to move up to No. 2 and get the franchise’s first true franchise quarterback since Sammy Baugh possibly will make them winners. Mortgaging the future by giving up three first-round draft picks and a second-round pick possibly will make them losers.


Going up to get RGIII makes them Winners but giving up 2 #1 and a 2nd makes them losers... :hmm: Would holding on to that 2nd round pick have sent the #2 pick to Cleveland? (that's basically what the Browns say anyway). Wouldn't that have made the Skins the losers. You can't win and pay less than those your bidding against.



Should have been the #3 Winner
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis
Posts: 12025
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: on the bandwagon
Contact:

Post by Irn-Bru »

"So much money" to Josh Morgan? We got him for a very good price.

I also think we overpaid for Garcon, but (a) what else were we supposed to do? he was the second best WR on the market and the best got paid twice as much, and (b) we didn't way overpay for him anyway — plus, if we didn't give him that much money, about 5 or 6 teams were probably in line behind us to do so.

And this guy is totally incoherent on the draft.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:Oh goodness gracious, get off the darned fence.


ROTFALMAO BEFORE anyone says anything ...

I DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THIS IN ANY WAY

thanks 1niksder .. that guy amazes even the likes of me :lol:
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Post Reply