What do you think of Jason Campbell?

Washington Football Game Day discussions for 2003, 2004, and 2005

Is Jason Campbell a good guy? A good quarterback? Both? Neither

Poll ended at Sat Jul 24, 2010 12:08 pm

He is a very good quarterback and a good guy
11
48%
He's a very good quarterback, but a complete jerk
0
No votes
He sucks as a quarterback, but I like him personally
12
52%
He sucks as a quarterback and is a complete jerk
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 23

KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

What do you think of Jason Campbell?

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

I say this is nonsense, let's put it to the voters. I think JC sucks as a quarterback, but I think he's a great guy and was a great teammate with a good attitude.

cleg wrote:You are deluded if you think 90% of what is represented on this board is just people expressing thier opinions that he is not a good QB.
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

I think he is a good QB who played on some really bad teams. I think that he's now gone to a worse team but they do have a better line than us I think this year - but that's to be determined.

I think that it's pretty much classless for people to get on here and just totally trash the guy based off nothing but their opinion. As a player who was in the lockerroom, in the meetings, etc - something we were not a part of - and he never said anything. He didn't throw anyone under the bus. That is class and I think some on this site need to use a little.
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

frankcal20 wrote:I think that it's pretty much classless for people to get on here and just totally trash the guy based off nothing but their opinion. As a player who was in the lockerroom, in the meetings, etc - something we were not a part of - and he never said anything. He didn't throw anyone under the bus. That is class and I think some on this site need to use a little.

So even though you think he's a good quarterback and a good person, which is what I asked in the poll, you agree with cleg the criticism of him is personal, not just about his quarterbacking?

BTW, I did the poll this way on purpose, it's easy to say "other" people's attacks are personal, I wanted people to say what they think themselves, not judge other people's actions.
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

frankcal20 wrote:I think he is a good QB who played on some really bad teams. I think that he's now gone to a worse team but they do have a better line than us I think this year - but that's to be determined.

I think that it's pretty much classless for people to get on here and just totally trash the guy based off nothing but their opinion. As a player who was in the lockerroom, in the meetings, etc - something we were not a part of - and he never said anything. He didn't throw anyone under the bus. That is class and I think some on this site need to use a little.

I think he is a good QB and a good guy. I think he'll be a little less "classy" in the Black hole and that it will make him a better QB. He knows he should have been more out spoken in some situation while he was here and says he won't bite his tongue out west. It's a sad day when I believe he is going to a better situation in 2010 than he has had in DC over the past few years. Al Davis and the Cable Guy are better fit for JC than the B&G.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

So even though you think he's a good quarterback and a good person, which is what I asked in the poll, you agree with cleg the criticism of him is personal, not just about his quarterbacking?


I think there are many reasons why people don't care for him as a QB:

1. He's not a vocal leader - or not vocal enough
2. B/C he was a 1st round QB, he should be Peyton Manning out of the box with all the coaching changes, offensive line issues, etc....
3. He shouldn't be in the league anymore.

BTW, I did the poll this way on purpose, it's easy to say "other" people's attacks are personal, I wanted people to say what they think themselves, not judge other people's actions.


All I basically said is that it's important that people handle themselves with a bit of class. He's not a bad guy. He was a team player. He just played on bad teams and regardless of who's at QB, we wouldn't have been much better IMO.
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

Good guy but absolutely sucks as a qb.
Suck and Luck
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
+++++++++
Posts: 5227
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2004 12:21 pm
Contact:

Post by Skinsfan55 »

In 2005, the Redskins had NO business drafting a QB in the first round. You have to build a team around them first before you can add a QB. The team was a mess with no weapons at WR and a sub-par line in 2004. They also had turmoil in the front office and coaching staff. We never had a plan in place, and when you draft a QB you need to make sure the offense is tailored around them, and not the other way around.

Simply put, we never put Jason Campbell in a position to succeed. I'm a big believer in the idea that a lot of players have talent, but it's not always achieved. If Jason Campbell had been drafted by the Patriots, or the Colts, or the Saints... he may have found a niche in the NFL and made a lot more of his potential.

Personally, he seems like a great guy, teammates love him, he's 100% committed to the organization and he's a quiet leader. Even though the Raiders are a mess right now, I hope Jason Campbell can salvage his career there. Paul Hackett (QB coach) and Hue Jackson (OC) are really good offensive football guys and the Raiders will want to take advantage of JC's big arm.

Bruce Campbell could become an elite LT, Robert Gallery is a decent LT, Samson Satele is a good C, Cooper Carlisle is a solid veteran player and Langston Walker holds down the right tackle slot. That's a solid line... combine that with the fact they have Run DMC/Michael Bush to run, and some dangerous weapons in the receiving game... I think this is going to be JC's best season yet.
"Guess [Ryan Kerrigan] really does have a good motor. And is relentless. And never quits on a play. And just keeps coming. And probably eats Wheaties and drinks Apple Pie smoothies and shaves with Valvoline." -Dan Steinberg DC Sports Bog
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

I picked sucks at QB, but good guy because that is closer to my feelings than any other option. I don't feel like he sucks at QB, though, only that he is mediocre.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

If there were an option for "Good" quarterback, I would have chosen that. I picked option 1.

In reality he is a good quarterback who could have been better if our organization was not in-flux for the entire time he's been here.

Hopefully going to Oakland gives him the confidence to take control of the team and lead more vocally.

They will hail him as their savior since they've been forced to deal with the bust known as Jamarcus.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
chiefhog44
**ch44
**ch44
Posts: 2444
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: Chicago

Post by chiefhog44 »

Can somebody start a thread titled "The last word on Campbell" and it be THE END to talking about this guy... He gone.

And that's 1000 for me folks. I learned a lot during my first 999 posts, but I am now focused on moving to the next level as I make my way to 2,000. I have a number of goals such as cutting down the run-on sentences, spelling, and improving the overall quality of each post. Thanks for everything,
Chiefhog44
Miss you 21

12/17/09 - Ding Dong the Witch is Dead...Which Old Witch? The Wicked Witch.

1/6/10 - The start of another dark era
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

chiefhog44 wrote:Can somebody start a thread titled "The last word on Campbell"

Your wish is granted. And will be, over and over...
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
The Hogster
#######
#######
Posts: 7225
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:13 pm
Location: Washington D.C.

Post by The Hogster »

KazooSkinsFan wrote:
chiefhog44 wrote:Can somebody start a thread titled "The last word on Campbell"

Your wish is granted. And will be, over and over...


I have a feeling there won't be a last word on him. If he goes out there and leads them back to respectability or makes the playoffs, it will start a $-storm around here.

And, if he sucks there, people will still take shots from afar. Good luck Jason. I'm glad he went somewhere that is so god-awful, that the expectations are low enough for him to meet.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
User avatar
Manchester_Redskin
Hog
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 9:00 am
Location: Ex-Brit now living in Thailand

Post by Manchester_Redskin »

The few times I got to see him play live on TV I was amazed at how much the commentators criticised him, far more than any other QB. I think he was slow , perception-wise and that probably contributed to the high number of sacks. Its difficult to know how good he was as a lot of his stats were padded, during the game when the result was in doubt, he did little to impress, I cant recall him ever leading us back from behind and in the 2 games against the Eagles it was easy to tell which was the better QB, it wasnt JC. He threw few interceptions, but its hard to throw an interception when most of your passes are for completions behind the line of scrimage.

he hasnt got much competition at the Raiders, I dont think we need worry about him coming back to haunt us. A 4th round was probbly about right, not as good a deal as the last time we traded a QB to the raiders.

We traded up to get him, it was probably Coach JG's worse draft decision.
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

Here is an interesting video of Charlie Casserly breaking down JC's game...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTqk4Du4-wM
Suck and Luck
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

CanesSkins26 wrote:Here is an interesting video of Charlie Casserly breaking down JC's game...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTqk4Du4-wM


This was a breakdown of Jason Campbell running the Westcoast offense in Oct. '09.

Watching several media discussions since the trade, Jim Mora Jr. said it best "A great football player who's never been put in a position to succeed. Wrong system for a player who works best out of the shotgun, making plays with his feet and working the play action game. He also said that he's got a huge arm and suited for down the field play." Um, I'm a Campbell guy but he's got to work on the downfield stuff though :)
gibbsfan
Joe's#1Fan
Joe's#1Fan
Posts: 1948
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 11:59 am
Location: chocowinity nc

Post by gibbsfan »

i think JC is a class act and handled everything with just that class.

i wish him well in oaktown.
This Ownership Has The Quarantine Virus..
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

frankcal20 wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:Here is an interesting video of Charlie Casserly breaking down JC's game...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTqk4Du4-wM


This was a breakdown of Jason Campbell running the Westcoast offense in Oct. '09.

Watching several media discussions since the trade, Jim Mora Jr. said it best "A great football player who's never been put in a position to succeed. Wrong system for a player who works best out of the shotgun, making plays with his feet and working the play action game. He also said that he's got a huge arm and suited for down the field play." Um, I'm a Campbell guy but he's got to work on the downfield stuff though :)


When Zorn took over all we heard about, including posts by many on this board, that he was better suited for the WC offense and that that was the offense he ran best in college. Now it's back to JC not being suited for the WC offense, but is instead best suited for a vertical passing offense, which is what he struggled with under Gibbs/Saunders. Maybe, just maybe, he isn't cut out to run any type of NFL offense.
Suck and Luck
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

First off - Saunders offense is very detail oriented and is/was only here for one year. Gibbs' offense was here for one year and Zorn's was here for two. I've said it all along that he's best at play action and in the shotgun. He's also best at running a hurry up offense and what really cracked me up, we were at our best last year when our headsets were not working and he was calling his own plays.
PulpExposure
Pushing Paper
Pushing Paper
Posts: 4860
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 3:01 pm

Post by PulpExposure »

Too stark a choice.

Average QB, very good person.
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

PulpExposure wrote:Too stark a choice.

Average QB, very good person.



QFT
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
User avatar
riggofan
HereComesTheDiesel
HereComesTheDiesel
Posts: 9460
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 5:29 pm
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Post by riggofan »

This poll is missing a couple options. I think alot of people probably believe Campbell is a really good guy and just an OK quarterback.

For the people who want us all to believe that Campbell "sucks", I understand your disappointment in the guy but let me offer you some NFL QB who really sucked. Ryan Leaf. Joey Harrington. Chris Weinke. Tim Rattay. Akili Smith. Heath Schuler. Jamarcus Russell.

I mean, let's be real about this. Campbell is never going to be Drew Brees, but he's not Jamarcus Russell either. Give the guy a break.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You can't do epic **** with basic people." - DJax
"We're on the rise, man, whether you're on the train or not." - Josh Norman
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

riggofan wrote:This poll is missing a couple options

Every poll is, you can't cover every conceivable option. But in designing polls for businesses you like to avoid middle of the road choices because a lot of people will just chose that rather then taking a position. It's better to go with the polars and make them pick. I actually have some expertise in business polls, I'm not just saying it. I'm also not saying you can't feel differently, I'm just telling you what businesses do and why I did it that way.

Also, the point of the poll was to respond to cleg's assertion that JC is "hated." Obviously not by the majority of Skin fans, the result was unanimous in that, everyone thinks he's a good guy. As Trey pointed out he must be too used to Philly fans.
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
User avatar
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~
Posts: 8496
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Post by REDEEMEDSKIN »

I think he's an accomplished QB (his stats indicate as much), but not a great one.

With the way he handled his stay in Washington and constant trade rumors, there's no doubt in my mind he's a high-character, classy, and nice guy.

Good luck, JC in Oakland.
Back and better than ever!
RayNAustin
Hog
Posts: 2370
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:56 am

Post by RayNAustin »

frankcal20 wrote:First off - Saunders offense is very detail oriented and is/was only here for one year. Gibbs' offense was here for one year and Zorn's was here for two. I've said it all along that he's best at play action and in the shotgun. He's also best at running a hurry up offense and what really cracked me up, we were at our best last year when our headsets were not working and he was calling his own plays.


That's not accurate ... Saunders was here TWO years ... 2006 & 2007.

Jason Campbell spent the entire 2005 season on the bench learning Gibbs system behind Brunell ... in the offseason, Saunders was brought in, and Brunell was expected to digest and run the system. JC remained on the bench for the first 9 games, and finished the 2006 season (7 games) under Saunders offense. Then he had the entire offseason, and preseason, and the 2007 under Saunders system until he was hurt.

The deal is, Campbell missed a lot of downfield throws, and opportunities when he didn't see the open receivers downfield. I recall very distinctly JC commenting on how he preferred the gun, and wasn't comfortable working under center ... that he lost sight of his receivers from under center ... comments that simply amazed me that he would openly say such things as an NFL starting QB.

When the switch was made to Zorn and the WCO, I knew that wasn't really going to help Campbell because aside from the missed downfield opportunities, he demonstrated a very slow recognition of coverages and ability to run through progressions when the WCO demands very quick decisions. He also demonstrated a lack of touch and accuracy on short and intermediate throws ... another minus in a WC system.

The bottom line is that over his 5 year career, Jason's football IQ really didn't improve dramatically ... he still demonstrated the same weaknesses he brought with him as a rookie, and never was able to adjust to the speed of the NFL. He was still working on fundamentals, rather than honing the skills you expect from a veteran QB ... instead of mastering the nuances of looking off safeties to free up a zone .. JC needed reminding to step up in the pocket instead of getting trapped by the edge rushers.

As was outlined in the Casserly piece ... Jason didn't maximize the opportunities presented ... he repeatedly threw to the wrong guy when better options were open for bigger plays ... frequently taking the short throws rather than the intermediate or deeper receiver.

When you look at the total body of work, and honestly evaluate his progress ... forget the stats ... and forget 2009 and all of the turmoil, look at 2007-2008 seasons ... he didn't really shine in either system, even when he had adequate protection.

The NFL, with the parity that exists, along with the slim margin of error that determines winning and losing ... often times boiling down to a couple of big plays making the difference ... Campbell just didn't make those critical plays when he had the opportunity, and when the team needed him to.

Campbell is a safe backup QB ... but not the guy to lead. He just has too many flaws .. misses too many opportunities to be a consistent winner in the NFL.
User avatar
markshark84
Hog
Posts: 2642
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 12:44 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Post by markshark84 »

Skinsfan55 wrote:In 2005, the Redskins had NO business drafting a QB in the first round. You have to build a team around them first before you can add a QB. The team was a mess with no weapons at WR and a sub-par line in 2004. They also had turmoil in the front office and coaching staff. We never had a plan in place, and when you draft a QB you need to make sure the offense is tailored around them, and not the other way around.

Simply put, we never put Jason Campbell in a position to succeed. I'm a big believer in the idea that a lot of players have talent, but it's not always achieved. If Jason Campbell had been drafted by the Patriots, or the Colts, or the Saints... he may have found a niche in the NFL and made a lot more of his potential.


I am not sure they didn't put JC in a position to succeed. In 2005, when he was drafted, we made the playoffs. In 2006, we had a decent OL (JC was only sacked 7 times in as many games). In 2007, the year he got injured and TC took over, we had a very solid team -- which was evident by winning 4 straight, without JC, to make the playoffs. In the beginning of 2008, the line was still solid and we were winning. Injuries hurt the OL and JC feel apart. Also, in the beginning of 2009 the line was giving JC adequate pass protection (the run blocking was horrible), but later in the season feel apart -- regardless of that fact, JC played poorly throughout 2009.

With the exception of the final games of '08 and '09, JC had decent protection --- I am not saying he could sit in the pocket for 7 seconds -- but he had enough time to make plays.

Now the scheme was a different story. That can be argued forever -- whether it was JC throwing 5 yard dunks or the scheme -- so I understand that is open to interpretation.

But, as far as the Colts, Pats, and Saints --- remember the Saints were 3-13 the year before Drew got to NO. He was the major reason that team went 10-6 the next year. And remember when Manning was drafted. He inherited a 3-13 team that he turned into a 13-3 team within 2 years. The colts only changed one OL player between 98 (when they were 3-13) and 99 (13-3). QBs have to make opportunities -- they shouldn't just sit and wait until everything is presented to them on a silver platter. The skins, during JC's tenure, were far better than the 97 and 98 colts and were better than the 05 Saints. The QB has a ton to do with those teams and to suggest otherwise is crazy. I am of the opinion that JC would have been worse off if placed in the positions that Brees or Manning were in.
RIP Sean Taylor. You will be missed.
Locked