I Would Love for These to Be Our Top Two Picks

Washington Football Game Day discussions for 2003, 2004, and 2005
Locked
jmoss10686
newbie
Posts: 7
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 10:53 am

I Would Love for These to Be Our Top Two Picks

Post by jmoss10686 »

http://www.pressboxonline.com/blog.cfm?ID=2094

Read this article today and I would absolutely love if we got Jimmy Clausen in the first and Charles Brown in the second. Cody would make sense too. I think it's funny that it even mentions Eric Berry as a possibility at number four though.
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Re: I Would Love for These to Be Our Top Two Picks

Post by yupchagee »

jmoss10686 wrote:http://www.pressboxonline.com/blog.cfm?ID=2094

Read this article today and I would absolutely love if we got Jimmy Clausen in the first and Charles Brown in the second. Cody would make sense too. I think it's funny that it even mentions Eric Berry as a possibility at number four though.


Not Clausen. Too many questions about his leadership. Drafting a def. player in 1st or 2nd round makes no sense. Out D is at least respectable. Our O is almost on life support.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Re: I Would Love for These to Be Our Top Two Picks

Post by 1niksder »

yupchagee wrote:
jmoss10686 wrote:http://www.pressboxonline.com/blog.cfm?ID=2094

Read this article today and I would absolutely love if we got Jimmy Clausen in the first and Charles Brown in the second. Cody would make sense too. I think it's funny that it even mentions Eric Berry as a possibility at number four though.


Not Clausen. Too many questions about his leadership. Drafting a def. player in 1st or 2nd round makes no sense. Out D is at least respectable. Our O is almost on life support.


:?: :?: :?: :?: almost :?: :?: :?: :?:
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
**LPJ**
Posts: 6714
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
Contact:

Re: I Would Love for These to Be Our Top Two Picks

Post by langleyparkjoe »

1niksder wrote:
yupchagee wrote:
jmoss10686 wrote:http://www.pressboxonline.com/blog.cfm?ID=2094

Read this article today and I would absolutely love if we got Jimmy Clausen in the first and Charles Brown in the second. Cody would make sense too. I think it's funny that it even mentions Eric Berry as a possibility at number four though.


Not Clausen. Too many questions about his leadership. Drafting a def. player in 1st or 2nd round makes no sense. Out D is at least respectable. Our O is almost on life support.


:?: :?: :?: :?: almost :?: :?: :?: :?:


:lol: With Chris retiring let's say the OL just flat lined.. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hog Bowl Champions
'09 & '17 langleyparkjoe, '10 Cappster, '11 & '13 DarthMonk,
'12 Deadskins, '14 PickSixerTWSS, '15 APEX PREDATOR, '16 vwoodzpusha
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Posts: 9017
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:52 pm
Contact:

Post by frankcal20 »

Yeah - no thanks. Clausen makes no sense AT ALL for this year. But I'm also one of a few that thinks that Jason Campbell is decent enough for this season.
crazyhorse1
ch1
ch1
Posts: 3634
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:01 pm
Location: virginia beach

Post by crazyhorse1 »

frankcal20 wrote:Yeah - no thanks. Clausen makes no sense AT ALL for this year. But I'm also one of a few that thinks that Jason Campbell is decent enough for this season.


I flat out think Clausen will be a bust. Much of his success last year was due to Golden Tate, who is underrated.
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
**LPJ**
Posts: 6714
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:12 am
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
Contact:

Post by langleyparkjoe »

crazyhorse1 wrote:
frankcal20 wrote:Yeah - no thanks. Clausen makes no sense AT ALL for this year. But I'm also one of a few that thinks that Jason Campbell is decent enough for this season.


I flat out think Clausen will be a bust. Much of his success last year was due to Golden Tate, who is underrated.


Good point about Tate helping Clausen out.. kinda like Ronnie Brown and Cadillac with JC
Hog Bowl Champions
'09 & '17 langleyparkjoe, '10 Cappster, '11 & '13 DarthMonk,
'12 Deadskins, '14 PickSixerTWSS, '15 APEX PREDATOR, '16 vwoodzpusha
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

No matter if we take a QB with the 4 pick or later - at this time Campbell is the best option for QB - he's not very good but he's the best option

I don't see a QB, RB or OL who started a game here in 2008 or 2009 being a part of this franchise in any capacity in 2012
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin
Posts: 6684
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 5:02 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Post by CanesSkins26 »

langleyparkjoe wrote:
crazyhorse1 wrote:
frankcal20 wrote:Yeah - no thanks. Clausen makes no sense AT ALL for this year. But I'm also one of a few that thinks that Jason Campbell is decent enough for this season.


I flat out think Clausen will be a bust. Much of his success last year was due to Golden Tate, who is underrated.


Good point about Tate helping Clausen out.. kinda like Ronnie Brown and Cadillac with JC


The difference obviously being that Ronnie Brown and Cadillac were rb's so JC could rely on the running game, whereas Claussen actually had to throw the football.
Suck and Luck
User avatar
SnyderSucks
Hog
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 6:56 pm
Location: Colorado

Got to be tackle

Post by SnyderSucks »

Based on what they have done (or haven't done) I think it indicates they are planning to draft at least one and probably two tackles with the first two picks. If Bradford is available, they might take him and pray to keep him alive the first season, but no way they pass on a tackle to take Clausen at 4. Clausen has all the makings of Ryan Leaf.
With the Cardinals reaching the Super Bowl, is Dan Snyder officially the worst owner in the league?
crazyhorse1
ch1
ch1
Posts: 3634
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:01 pm
Location: virginia beach

Re: Got to be tackle

Post by crazyhorse1 »

SnyderSucks wrote:Based on what they have done (or haven't done) I think it indicates they are planning to draft at least one and probably two tackles with the first two picks. If Bradford is available, they might take him and pray to keep him alive the first season, but no way they pass on a tackle to take Clausen at 4. Clausen has all the makings of Ryan Leaf.


I agree. The second pick will be an OT. The first will be Bradford or an OT. I am a bit nervous now that we have failed to land Foote. We might be tempted to grab an OT in the first and a LB in the second. I certainly hope not.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

I hope we can get Bradford or Okung - no matter who we get, after that I hope we take advantage of a draft that reportedly has a lot of potentially good offensive linemen
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
crazyhorse1
ch1
ch1
Posts: 3634
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:01 pm
Location: virginia beach

Post by crazyhorse1 »

SkinsJock wrote:I hope we can get Bradford or Okung - no matter who we get, after that I hope we take advantage of a draft that reportedly has a lot of potentially good offensive linemen


Having a lot of good defensive linemen means we could still grab a good one in the second, not the fourth. There are no good OL prospects who will last until the fourth. We've got to get our OL prospects in the first two rounds or do without.
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

crazyhorse1 wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:I hope we can get Bradford or Okung - no matter who we get, after that I hope we take advantage of a draft that reportedly has a lot of potentially good offensive linemen


Having a lot of good defensive linemen means we could still grab a good one in the second, not the fourth. There are no good OL prospects who will last until the fourth. We've got to get our OL prospects in the first two rounds or do without.


Right. LT in the 1st & best OL still there in the 2nd.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
Locked