No Force Out Rule

Talk about the AFC, NFC, the NFL Draft, College Football... anything football that has no Washington Football Team relevance.
Post Reply
Bob 0119
The Punisher
The Punisher
Posts: 2592
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Manassas

No Force Out Rule

Post by Bob 0119 »

I'm surprised there hasn't been more coverage of this rule change, but I believe that this, moreso than any of the other rule changes, will have the most dramamtic impact on the league this year.

The media has kinda glossed over this rule change citing the very few times a "force out" has been ruled over the past couple of years.

The part that the media seems to be missing is that over the past few years, DB haven't been trying to force the recievers out of bounds...thanks to the force out rule.

Now that that rule is gone, corners can play the man, not the ball, along the sidelines.

If the reciever goes up for the ball, the defender can shove him as he's coming down.

If the reciever doesn't get both feet in bounds...he's out.

This is going to be a huge help to the DBs along the sidelines, and in the end-zone.

We'll see, but I think this rule is going to have a huge impact this year.
GSPODS
Hog
Posts: 4716
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:20 am

Post by GSPODS »

I think it will mostly affect the two-minute offenses when QB's and receivers are intentionally targeting the sidelines to save timeouts. Especially for teams like the Redskins who seem to burn their timeouts well ahead of the final two minutes of each half.
Bob 0119
The Punisher
The Punisher
Posts: 2592
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Manassas

Post by Bob 0119 »

GSPODS wrote:I think it will mostly affect the two-minute offenses when QB's and receivers are intentionally targeting the sidelines to save timeouts. Especially for teams like the Redskins who seem to burn their timeouts well ahead of the final two minutes of each half.


Definately.

Good call, I hadn't thought about the 2-minute drills.
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge
Posts: 16632
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Post by Countertrey »

Frankly, I'm loving the possibilities. For decades, the league has been devising new ways to emasculate DB's. This is the first time in my memory that they have given something back to them, and it's about time.

Make the receivers EARN their checks, like they did when 49 and 42 were doing it and getting mugged the whole time. I hope it's just the beginning.
"That's a clown question, bro"
- - - - - - - - - - Bryce Harper, DC Statesman
"But Oz never did give nothing to the Tin Man
That he didn't, didn't already have"
- - - - - - - - - - Dewey Bunnell, America
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18395
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

I think the DBs will take about a year to adjust, but then if they get a receiver anywhere near the sidelines, they will carry him OOB if they have to, to prevent him from getting his feet down. I too, like the new rule.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
cvillehog
Hog
Posts: 5220
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 3:03 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by cvillehog »

GSPODS wrote:Especially for teams like the Redskins who seem to burn their timeouts well ahead of the final two minutes of each half.


What are you basing this on?
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18395
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

cvillehog wrote:
GSPODS wrote:Especially for teams like the Redskins who seem to burn their timeouts well ahead of the final two minutes of each half.


What are you basing this on?

Past experience. :lol:
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
User avatar
cvillehog
Hog
Posts: 5220
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 3:03 pm
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by cvillehog »

JSPB22 wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
GSPODS wrote:Especially for teams like the Redskins who seem to burn their timeouts well ahead of the final two minutes of each half.


What are you basing this on?

Past experience. :lol:


To quote Charles Schwab, past results aren't an indication of future performance. :)

In this case, especially so, since there is a different person in charge of the timeouts.
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

I think it's a good change. Long overdue. Remains to be seen how much effect it will have.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
ChocolateMilk
Hog
Posts: 803
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Fredericksburg Virginia
Contact:

Post by ChocolateMilk »

i am soooo glad they changed this rule, i absolutely hated this rule. it was crap
R.I.P. Sean Taylor

You will be missed, but never forgotten
User avatar
flamethrower
Hog
Posts: 1652
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 4:12 am
Location: Down the road on my Yamaha Majesty

Post by flamethrower »

About darned time that they did this. I like it.
Cowturd hater in the house.
Majesty rider in the house.
Cowturd troll owner here
Does Brokeback mountain mean anything to cowturd fanatics?
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18395
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

A perfect example of this rule's possible ramifications just now: With 23 seconds left in the half Kitna to Roy Williams in the back corner of the end zone for a TD. Jump ball where Roy has about a foot size advantage over the Atlanta DB. If the DB doesn't jump with Roy, but instead waits for the catch and then drives him out of bounds, no catch, no TD. Once the DBs in the league get used to this rule, it will have a big impact, but only if they play with discipline.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
Post Reply