Irn-Bru wrote:BnGhog wrote:No Mix hasn't proved anything yet. My point was, Mix, Kelly and Thomas are all unproven in the NFL, why does Thomas get the highest pay?
Because it would be ludicrous to pretend that the three receivers have the same potential. Kelly or Thomas could be busts but that doesn't make them equal with every other rookie entering the league. You are denying the reality that some players are poised to succeed, and because of that their skills are in high demand.
No, I am not denying the reality that some are poised to succeed. What is being proposed is a Rookie salorie cap. IF there were a 3 year cap for Rookies, They would all make the same. I don't deny one has more "potential" than the other but that is the only reason one gets paid more. He gets paid more for "potential" and that would not happen in any other business. Have you ever got any raise for potential, or was if for production? The point still stands, he is getting paid for potential, not production. Sure he has more potential, he still could be a bust. That's the entire issue with (maybe) adding a rookie cap.

ey's personal issue is, so rookies won't make more than probowlers. But why pay a buy at all based on potential, if guy like Tom Brady is drafted in the 6th round, and getting paid 1/4 of what Ricky Williams got paid right out of the draft.

Based on potential? Makes no sense.
The Cap in question is also, so you won't have to pay millions based on potential, then that potential never gets met.
I firmly believe the Patriots are the antichrist.