Page 1 of 1
Smoot Tweaks Hamstring
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 3:55 pm
by 1niksder
Smoot Tweaks Hamstring
Redskins Cornerback Fred Smoot injured his hamstring during practice Saturday and is listed as probable on the injury report for Monday's game in Philadelphia.
Tight end Todd Yoder is limited with an ankle injury and is also probable. Listed as questionable are defensive end Phillip Daniels, with a sprained foot and safety Pierson Prioleau, with a hamstring. Safety Vernon Fox is doubtful with a groin injury
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:03 pm
by everydayAskinsday
and suddenly Springs is back in the starting line up and all is right with the redskins fans
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:24 pm
by ComebackSkins
I do like that spring is in the starting line up....but I am worried about nickel packages. With mcnab's scrambling ability he be able to put together more successful drives than he would have.
Does philly line in in 3 WR sets that often?
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:26 pm
by Irn-Bru
ComebackSkins wrote:I do like that spring is in the starting line up....but I am worried about nickel packages. With mcnab's scrambling ability he be able to put together more successful drives than he would have.
Does philly line in in 3 WR sets that often?
I'm not sure that we would have to worry about nickel pacakges. Macklin had a monster pre-season, and he's probably licking his chops to get a shot as some playing time.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:30 pm
by ComebackSkins
preseason is still preseason... I hope youre right though. I didnt pay attention much during preseason. Did he ever go against a 1st team offense?
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:42 pm
by everydayAskinsday
Smoot is still listed as probable also.. so what we will most likely see is Springs and Rogers starting with Smoot and Macklin rotating in the nickel spot .. that way we dont risk Smoot .. but he will still be a factor in this game IMO
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 6:14 pm
by 1niksder
ComebackSkins wrote:preseason is still preseason... I hope youre right though. I didnt pay attention much during preseason. Did he ever go against a 1st team offense?
Yes
Started 2 years in Az, and 2 years in Indy...8th year in the league
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 6:52 pm
by frankcal20
Keep in mind that this may be just a ploy to possibly throw off their game plan.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:13 pm
by Redskins Rule
Do the Eagles even have wide recievers? Isn't this the same team that had that guy, who ESPN called "alligator body"!?!?!??!
SO WHAT!?!?!?
Now if one of our linebackers had tweaked a hammy I'd be a little nervous, because of Westbrooke. But...............nevermind!
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:17 pm
by por-tiz2skins
everydayAskinsday wrote:Smoot is still listed as probable also.. so what we will most likely see is Springs and Rogers starting with Smoot and Macklin rotating in the nickel spot .. that way we dont risk Smoot .. but he will still be a factor in this game IMO
Smoot is going to start but I would like to see smoot and Springs.
Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:30 pm
by 1fan4ramsey
ComebackSkins wrote:I do like that spring is in the starting line up....but I am worried about nickel packages. With mcnab's scrambling ability he be able to put together more successful drives than he would have.
Does philly line in in 3 WR sets that often?
McNabb said this week on Comcast that he can move around in the pocket but still does'nt have the explosive running ability he had before the knee surgery, we'll see.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:35 am
by por-tiz2skins
If we can beat them can not only give us an better chance but by having them possibly being out of playoff contention.
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:09 pm
by PulpExposure
Redskins Rule wrote:Do the Eagles even have wide recievers? Isn't this the same team that had that guy, who ESPN called "alligator body"!?!?!??!
You mean the same guy we signed in training camp?
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:53 pm
by Fios
PulpExposure wrote:Redskins Rule wrote:Do the Eagles even have wide recievers? Isn't this the same team that had that guy, who ESPN called "alligator body"!?!?!??!
You mean the same guy we signed in training camp?
You mean the same guy the Redskins cut a few weeks later?
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 11:09 pm
by Irn-Bru
Fios wrote:PulpExposure wrote:Redskins Rule wrote:Do the Eagles even have wide recievers? Isn't this the same team that had that guy, who ESPN called "alligator body"!?!?!??!
You mean the same guy we signed in training camp?
You mean the same guy the Redskins cut a few weeks later?
You mean the guy that was after the other one who failed so badly?
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:38 am
by Justice Hog
Redskins Rule wrote:Do the Eagles even have wide recievers? Isn't this the same team that had that guy, who ESPN called "alligator body"!?!?!??!
SO WHAT!?!?!?
Now if one of our linebackers had tweaked a hammy I'd be a little nervous, because of Westbrooke. But...............nevermind!
I like that kid, Avant, on the Eagles. Something about him...don't know what exactly.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:44 am
by BnGhog
Irn-Bru wrote:Fios wrote:PulpExposure wrote:Redskins Rule wrote:Do the Eagles even have wide recievers? Isn't this the same team that had that guy, who ESPN called "alligator body"!?!?!??!
You mean the same guy we signed in training camp?
You mean the same guy the Redskins cut a few weeks later?
You mean the guy that was after the other one who failed so badly?
WHY CAN'T ANYONE JUST SAY PINKY????