Smoot Tweaks Hamstring

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 3:55 pm

Smoot Tweaks Hamstring

Redskins Cornerback Fred Smoot injured his hamstring during practice Saturday and is listed as probable on the injury report for Monday's game in Philadelphia.

Tight end Todd Yoder is limited with an ankle injury and is also probable. Listed as questionable are defensive end Phillip Daniels, with a sprained foot and safety Pierson Prioleau, with a hamstring. Safety Vernon Fox is doubtful with a groin injury

everydayAskinsday · Post by **everydayAskinsday** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:03 pm

and suddenly Springs is back in the starting line up and all is right with the redskins fans :lol:

ComebackSkins · Post by **ComebackSkins** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:24 pm

I do like that spring is in the starting line up....but I am worried about nickel packages. With mcnab's scrambling ability he be able to put together more successful drives than he would have.

Does philly line in in 3 WR sets that often?

Irn-Bru · Post by **Irn-Bru** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:26 pm

ComebackSkins wrote:I do like that spring is in the starting line up....but I am worried about nickel packages. With mcnab's scrambling ability he be able to put together more successful drives than he would have.

Does philly line in in 3 WR sets that often?

I'm not sure that we would have to worry about nickel pacakges. Macklin had a monster pre-season, and he's probably licking his chops to get a shot as some playing time.

ComebackSkins · Post by **ComebackSkins** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:30 pm

preseason is still preseason... I hope youre right though. I didnt pay attention much during preseason. Did he ever go against a 1st team offense?

everydayAskinsday · Post by **everydayAskinsday** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:42 pm

Smoot is still listed as probable also.. so what we will most likely see is Springs and Rogers starting with Smoot and Macklin rotating in the nickel spot .. that way we dont risk Smoot .. but he will still be a factor in this game IMO

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 6:14 pm

ComebackSkins wrote:preseason is still preseason... I hope youre right though. I didnt pay attention much during preseason. Did he ever go against a 1st team offense?

Yes
Started 2 years in Az, and 2 years in Indy...8th year in the league

frankcal20 · Post by **frankcal20** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 6:52 pm

Keep in mind that this may be just a ploy to possibly throw off their game plan.

Redskins Rule · Post by **Redskins Rule** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:13 pm

Do the Eagles even have wide recievers? Isn't this the same team that had that guy, who ESPN called "alligator body"!?!?!??!

SO WHAT!?!?!?

Now if one of our linebackers had tweaked a hammy I'd be a little nervous, because of Westbrooke. But...............nevermind!

por-tiz2skins · Post by **por-tiz2skins** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:17 pm

everydayAskinsday wrote:Smoot is still listed as probable also.. so what we will most likely see is Springs and Rogers starting with Smoot and Macklin rotating in the nickel spot .. that way we dont risk Smoot .. but he will still be a factor in this game IMO

Smoot is going to start but I would like to see smoot and Springs.

1fan4ramsey · Post by **1fan4ramsey** » Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:30 pm

ComebackSkins wrote:I do like that spring is in the starting line up....but I am worried about nickel packages. With mcnab's scrambling ability he be able to put together more successful drives than he would have.

Does philly line in in 3 WR sets that often?

McNabb said this week on Comcast that he can move around in the pocket but still does'nt have the explosive running ability he had before the knee surgery, we'll see.

por-tiz2skins · Post by **por-tiz2skins** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 1:35 am

If we can beat them can not only give us an better chance but by having them possibly being out of playoff contention.

PulpExposure · Post by **PulpExposure** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 7:09 pm

Redskins Rule wrote:Do the Eagles even have wide recievers? Isn't this the same team that had that guy, who ESPN called "alligator body"!?!?!??!

You mean the same guy we signed in training camp?

Fios · Post by **Fios** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:53 pm

PulpExposure wrote:
Redskins Rule wrote:Do the Eagles even have wide recievers? Isn't this the same team that had that guy, who ESPN called "alligator body"!?!?!??!

You mean the same guy we signed in training camp?

You mean the same guy the Redskins cut a few weeks later?

Irn-Bru · Post by **Irn-Bru** » Sun Sep 16, 2007 11:09 pm

Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
Redskins Rule wrote:Do the Eagles even have wide recievers? Isn't this the same team that had that guy, who ESPN called "alligator body"!?!?!??!

You mean the same guy we signed in training camp?

You mean the same guy the Redskins cut a few weeks later?

You mean the guy that was after the other one who failed so badly?

Justice Hog · Post by **Justice Hog** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:38 am

Redskins Rule wrote:Do the Eagles even have wide recievers? Isn't this the same team that had that guy, who ESPN called "alligator body"!?!?!??!

SO WHAT!?!?!?

Now if one of our linebackers had tweaked a hammy I'd be a little nervous, because of Westbrooke. But...............nevermind!

I like that kid, Avant, on the Eagles. Something about him...don't know what exactly.

BnGhog · Post by **BnGhog** » Mon Sep 17, 2007 11:44 am

Irn-Bru wrote:
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
Redskins Rule wrote:Do the Eagles even have wide recievers? Isn't this the same team that had that guy, who ESPN called "alligator body"!?!?!??!

You mean the same guy we signed in training camp?

You mean the same guy the Redskins cut a few weeks later?

You mean the guy that was after the other one who failed so badly?

WHY CAN'T ANYONE JUST SAY PINKY????