Snyder Interview

Talk about the Washington Football Team here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
hatsOFF2gibbs
^^
^^
Posts: 2005
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Northern VA

Snyder Interview

Post by hatsOFF2gibbs »

Dan dishes

Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder sat down with beat writer David Elfin for an hour yesterday in his first on-the-record interview with a newspaper reporter in more than two years.

The transcript of the conversation, which follows, covered the gamut from the early dismissal of coaches Norv Turner and Marty Schottenheimer to this month's controversial trade of wide receiver Laveranues Coles to the New York Jets.

A self-described "lightning rod" for criticism because of his youth and brashness, Snyder admitted he has made mistakes during his tenure. Snyder, who has yet to produce a winning team following an offseason during which he was in charge, said he has never made decisions on player personnel.

Despite last season's 6-10 record, Snyder firmly believes the Redskins are headed in the right direction under coach Joe Gibbs. The owner also remains confident FedEx Field will one day play host to the Super Bowl under a temporary, inflatable roof.

TWT: You have been the owner of the Redskins for almost six years. What has been the most rewarding thing for you during that time?

Snyder: Bringing back Joe Gibbs. Clearly that was one of the most important decisions in the history of the franchise, and it was very rewarding to me personally.

TWT: Why was it so important to hire him?

Snyder: You're talking about someone that can set the standard for the Redskins. By standard, I mean the definition of a Redskin, on the field and off the field. Joe is the perfect guy to put that stamp back on the franchise.

TWT: How about the flip side? What has been the most disappointing thing about your ownership?

Snyder: Probably the tenure of Steve Spurrier, the expectations that he would succeed in the NFL. I think very highly of him and his family.

TWT: Why do you think he didn't succeed?

Snyder: I don't know. I'd like to say here's the exact reason why. There have been a lot of coaches coming from college that haven't succeeded at this level.

TWT: When you took over, people here were excited because you were a lifelong Washingtonian and had grown up rooting for this team and really cared about the Redskins. Everyone agrees about the latter point, but there's a perception out there that you were so eager that you went overboard.

Snyder: You may be right. I wasn't as patient then as I am now. I've developed more patience, an understanding of the continuity of the game and continuity on the business side as well. I probably ruffled feathers with the media, made some mistakes that gave them the opportunity [to criticize me]. And you know what happens when you give them the opportunity. ...

One of the things that bothers me is that I've been painted by some as the greedy owner. In reality, we haven't raised our general admission ticket prices for four years. That story runs on D8 as a blurb. The story that says we've changed our credit-card policy runs on A1 five times. At a certain point, there has to be some journalistic integrity.

TWT: But a lot of how you're perceived goes back to your first two years as the Redskins' owner. Tank McNamara was doing cartoons about you. How much of that bothered you, especially on a national level?

Snyder: To some degree, you get hazed. The stuff that really bothers me is the inaccuracies out there about everything we're doing. To read that we had a deal done with Santana Moss before we presented our first offer was sort of mind-boggling. That stuff bothers me more than the cartoon characters and the guys trying to be cute.

TWT: Do you think any of the criticism had to do with your youth?

Snyder: I think I'm a lightning rod. You do get tired of reading 'Internet billionaire' when you had nothing to do with the Internet. Before my father passed away, a newspaper in Tampa almost had him in tears when it wrote before we played down there, 'Don't you resent the guy who was 16 and got his first Mercedes from his Daddy?' That's just not true. That type of stuff bothers me because of the inaccuracies.

TWT: What about the cancer and [the passing of] your father? Does going through those situations make you appreciate life more?

Snyder: I miss my father every day. That's a terrible thing to experience, and it does change you -- awfully so. Thyroid cancer was a life-changing experience, but I was fortunate to have it taken care of. You definitely become more humble. When you lose your father, you feel a lot older. It's very hardening.

TWT: Do people perceive you badly or did you not handle things properly when you first came in the league?

Snyder: All of the above. I probably was too excited. I wanted, 'Now, now. Let's get this done now.' I didn't have a chance to get my own organization set because I took over in the middle of July. That was a strange period.

I probably overreacted in some negative ways. Sure. Absolutely. But I've learned an awful lot, and I truly think we're headed in the right direction. And when we go out to dinner, the fan response is amazing. People say, 'We're getting good. We're close.' The media paintbrush is not really working on Joe Gibbs and the franchise. ...

TWT: Do you regret what you did in 2000, bringing in Bruce Smith, Deion Sanders and Jeff George and tinkering with a team that had won the NFC East and lost a heartbreaker in the second round of the playoffs?

Snyder: We felt we were really close to winning a Super Bowl so, 'Let's finish it off.' We probably weren't as close as we thought. That was more systemic from getting the right coaches and right personnel department. Now we're headed in the right direction.

TWT: But that's five years later. Back then, you didn't show much faith in a coach, Norv Turner, and a quarterback, Brad Johnson, who had just won a division title. People were never able to get comfortable. It was if someone was always looking over their shoulders. You said you were overeager at first. Were you too hands-on, coming in right away like you knew everything about the NFL?

Snyder: It wasn't that. I really like Norv, but I never hired Norv. That's the big difference. When you hire Joe Gibbs and you outline his responsibilities, that he runs everything [on the football side]. When you come in and there are no defined responsibilities, it's difficult.

TWT: Do you think you should have kept [former general manager] Charley Casserly, who had just built a division champion?

Snyder: Absolutely. But it was so awkward, being in July. You're stuck [in terms of hiring a coach]. Ask Charley if he and Norv got along. It wasn't working.

TWT: Marty Schottenheimer certainly had defined responsibilities and you didn't enjoy that system either.

Snyder: Marty's having success in San Diego, and I wish him well. I consider him a friend. It just didn't fit, Marty and I.

TWT: But he went 8-3 in his last 11 games. And you still fired him. Did you need to be in control?

Snyder: I didn't think we were going in the right direction.

TWT: And with Spurrier?

Snyder: Steve resigned. I didn't want him to resign. I said, 'Why? Let's go do this.' He was going to be our coach last season. ...

TWT: Changing the coaches begat all the player and coordinator changes. Do you wish some of the players had stuck around a little bit longer?

Snyder: Absolutely. But you have free agency.

TWT: But everyone has that. Your roster is always shuffling.

Snyder: Not now. Not the last few years. We're headed in the right direction. Joe is extremely accurate when he talks about stability.

TWT: And yet, 'core Redskins' Fred Smoot and Antonio Pierce are gone. Why didn't you re-sign them?

Snyder: We tried so hard to sign those guys. We lost two guys that we considered 'Redskins.' We didn't want to lose them. But sometimes in the age of the salary cap, there's only so far financially that you can go before you can re-sign one of them and delete two other Redskins.

TWT: Do you wish you had pushed harder to get Fred and Antonio signed before they hit the market?

Snyder: You try and you make offers, but a lot of times, players will wait for the market to set the market. We don't lose many players. It just didn't work out with those two guys. We re-signed Chris Samuels and made him the highest-paid offensive lineman in franchise history.

At the end of the day, it's the player's decision. If Fred Smoot is offered a lot more money in Minnesota, he had to make that decision. It takes two sides to do the deal.

TWT: You're devoting a huge chunk of your cap this year to a guy who's not here, Laveranues Coles. That's a big gamble, isn't it?

Snyder: It's not a positive from a salary cap perspective. But when you have a player who doesn't want to be here and is griping to that extent, we turned a negative situation into a positive situation because of the acquisition of Santana Moss.

TWT: Aren't you sending the message to the next unhappy player that you're going to accommodate him, too?

Snyder: I don't think so. We have plenty of positive momentum. The response to Joe Gibbs by our players is very positive. Look at the number of our players here for the offseason workouts.

TWT: But even the Patriots have unhappy players. It's inevitable. Someone wants the ball more. Someone wants to play more. Haven't you opened a Pandora's box?

Snyder: And when Ty Law asked to be traded last year, New England said no. We elected to say yes to Laveranues for other reasons.

TWT: Why didn't you just say, 'It's too bad you're unhappy, Laveranues, but you're a Redskin?'

Snyder: If we couldn't have gotten what we wanted [in a trade with the Jets], we would have. He would have had to give the money back if he sat out so that wasn't going to happen.

TWT: It was reported that you threatened Laveranues and said you were going to send a flat-screen TV to his house so he could watch the games. What did you tell him?

Snyder: It's very disappointing to have a player that you entrusted, went after, gave a tremendous signing bonus to, gave a tremendous contract to [want out]. I verbalized that disappointment. The idea that I threatened him might have been a tactic by someone to get out there to try to force us to do something.

TWT: But you understand that the average fan, having heard so much about you over the years, would believe that you could have done what was reported?

Snyder: That does bother me. I was extremely disappointed, extremely taken aback that he didn't understand what it is to be a Joe Gibbs Redskin.

TWT: You said that Vinny Cerrato evaluates the personnel and Joe is ultimately in charge. Do you have any say in player acquisition?

Snyder: I give Joe my two cents about the contract and whether it makes sense financially. I'm very hands-on with the salary cap. I'll do the deal with the agent. But Joe does the recruiting and chooses the roster. It's his team.

TWT: So you're not going to tell Joe which cornerback you want to take with the ninth pick in the draft?

Snyder: Look at last year. I met both guys we were considering with the fifth pick, Kellen Winslow and Sean Taylor. They both seemed like nice guys. Joe had a very tough decision to make. He spent a lot of time on it, talked to his coaches and the personnel guys. Then he walked in my office and told me he had made up his mind. I was surprised [that Gibbs went for the defensive player]. All I did was hear it first.

TWT: What if you hadn't liked his decision?

Snyder: It was his decision. I've never told anyone who to draft. There's a false impression out there that I'm watching film, that I'm grading players. That's silly. I've never watched film and graded players. I don't want to be a coach. I just want to be the owner.

TWT: What about Deion? Didn't you want him and went out and got him?

Snyder: Vinny thought he would be the guy to get us to the ultimate game. I said, 'Fine.' But it didn't work out. It was our mistake.

TWT: Do you ever look at all the bonus money you've given out and at your 34-46 record the last five years and say it's not fair?

Snyder: Last season, we were 6-10. But we were awfully close in a lot of games. I'm very confident we're heading in the right direction.

TWT: Did you consciously change this offseason and realize that maybe signing all these free agents, spending so much money, sending Redskins One all around the country wasn't working?

Snyder: People want a lot of hoopla in the offseason, I guess, and maybe there wasn't as much hoopla this time. I feel pretty decent about the offseason other than I'm disappointed that we lost Fred and Antonio. We got a very strong center, and we've added a couple of very good receivers and a heck of a new safety.

Ultimately, it's up to Joe to pick and choose and decide what he wants. He's building the franchise he wants.

TWT: Can you really see competing with the Eagles, who have been the best team not just in the NFC East, but in the entire NFC, the last five years?

Snyder: We're going to try. We've got some strengths and weaknesses. We played the Eagles pretty good the second game at home. We can compete with them. We're going in the right direction. But it takes time.

TWT: Your coach is turning 65 in November. How much time is there?

Snyder: Joe signed a five-year contract. He's got four years left. I'm thinking about this year.

TWT: Why not give Vinny the GM title?

Snyder: Having a GM goes back to when the general manager ran the ticket office. He used to be like a CEO. Less than half the teams today have a GM. The majority of the coaches have the final say. New England and Philadelphia have a vice president of player personnel and no GM. We have the same structure.

TWT: Do you think you give your fans a good experience at FedEx Field?

Snyder: I'm a fan. I want the fan experience to be a great experience, bar none. We're doing pretty well in certain areas. We've spent millions to fix our parking lots and make them work. We've added gates to [aid] getting fans into the stadium as smoothly as possible.

Our concession prices aren't out of line. We put in escalators, added bathrooms, took the railings out. I put $100 million in to improve the quality of the fan experience. Some of our people may have gone too far in making the stadium really loud, but we've toned it down a lot the last couple of years.

We're doing the best we can with the traffic. You're always going to have situations when you're delivering that many people to a location at the same time. We just haven't won enough games.

TWT: Of course expanding the stadium makes the traffic worse. Are you done adding seats?

Snyder: Our fans are proud of having the biggest, loudest stadium in the NFL. I don't know if we're done.

TWT: You've wanted a Super Bowl there. Now it looks like New York is getting one and you're not. Do you think you have any chance?

Snyder: Yes. I'm glad New York is getting a Super Bowl. The trend is moving in the direction of big cities.

TWT: But New York is only getting a Super Bowl with a roofed stadium. The same thing is happening in Indianapolis, Kansas City and Dallas. You don't have a roof.

Snyder: There are ways of putting up an inflatable roof that will last for a Super Bowl. The technology is moving pretty quickly. We think it could work. If we want to put a roof on, we'll put a roof on. We've talked to the NFL about it, and they think it's a good idea.

TWT: Even though he has barely had any real success with his basketball team and his former hockey team since 1979, Abe Pollin is seen as this beloved, community-oriented owner. You've lost, too, but you've been vilified. Does that difference seem fair to you?

Snyder: Abe is a good man. He cares deeply about his team and his city the same as I do. He's as passionate as anybody. I congratulate him on turning around his franchise. They're going in the right direction.

The vilification I get is from the media, not the fans. Only 2 percent of our tickets turn over ever year. There are certain things that the fans aren't going to agree with, but I think they can all agree that Joe Gibbs is the best guy to run our franchise and that we work very hard to make the amenities at the stadium first-class.

They can all agree that I'm an owner who is willing to spend whatever it takes to build a winning team.

TWT: You were the youngest owner in the league when you took over in 1999. Are more owners thinking the way you do instead of in more traditional ways?

Snyder: I think I still am the youngest owner. I'm earning my stripes within the league. I think I'm respected by my colleagues. All I want is to produce a winner for the fans, on and off the field. I think we're doing a very effective job in the community. I really believe we're going to be a winner the next few years on the field.

TWT: Can you see ever being part of the old guard?

Snyder: I think it will happen. It's a natural evolution. Everyone ages. Some of my best pals are [in the NFL meeting rooms].

http://www.washingtontimes.com/sports/2 ... -4653r.htm
User avatar
Jake
Junior Hog
Junior Hog
Posts: 11253
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 4:18 am
Location: Mayo, Maryland
Contact:

Post by Jake »

RIP Sean Taylor 1983-2007
RIP Kevin Mitchell 1971-2007
RIP Justin Skaggs 1979-2007
RIP Sammy Baugh 1914-2008

RIP JPFair
RIP VetSkinsFan

#60 Chris Samuels: 6-time 6-time 6-time 6-time 6-time 6-time Pro Bowl left tackle!
User avatar
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~
Posts: 8496
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Post by REDEEMEDSKIN »

Thanks for posting this, hatsOFF2Gibbs. This really goes in depth into the interview with Snyder. Hopefully, our readers won't just automaticallly link to the other thread before reading the transcript in its entirety.

For the first time, I was able to read Dan Snyder's comments without hearing an "evil tone" in my head.

He claims that hiring Gibbs was the best decision for the organization... I think it shows most in him. The change from the "win, win now" approach to the "we were 6-10, but oh so close" is a sharp contrast. I guess Joe is truly making over the entire organization, and his effect is felt from top to bottom. :up:

One thing that I do think is interesting are his jabs at the Post, acts that have become all too common this offseason. In a way, I applaud him for "reprimanding" the Post for its "lack of journalistic integrity".

Since when does the "Times" carry any exclusives about the Skins??? That's news to me.

This year, the Post and WTEM are in the Redskins dog house. It's kinda fun to see how they are missing out on several Redskins coverage opportunities, as a result of "crossing" Snyder's organization.

Anyway, before I continue rambling on, I want to salute Snyder for the strides he's made in changing his public perception and his maturing into a "legitimate" owner (as if $800 million wasn't enough. :lol:).

I hope to one day be able to look back on these days and laugh at all the baggage in his first few years.

Winning a few SBs will speed up that process. :wink:
Back and better than ever!
User avatar
stwasm
swine
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:44 pm

Post by stwasm »

REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:This year, the Post and WTEM are in the Redskins dog house.


And the Post and the Sports Reporters are blasting the Redskins because of it. Snyder taking away those season tickets from the Post shows just how petty he can be. Plus, if you really read his quotes, he makes himself sound like he's an expert on the business of pro football when, in reality, he needs a good football mind to help make personnel and contract decisions while Danny just signs the checks. Of course, we have an owner who only wants Yes-Men around him. That's why we'll probably never win a Super Bowl under his watch!
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

stwasm wrote:... we have an owner who only wants Yes-Men around him. That's why we'll probably never win a Super Bowl under his watch!


Most of us do not think of Joe as a "yes-man" or a part of a 'Yes-Men' group (if that is different).

We may not win a SB in the near future because DS brought Gibbs back to make the football decisions for the Redskins but we will be very competitive and IMO we will get back to the level of success that most of us think we should be year in and year out.
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
EasyMoney
Hog
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Germantown, Maryland

Post by EasyMoney »

stwasm wrote:And the Post and the Sports Reporters are blasting the Redskins because of it. Snyder taking away those season tickets from the Post shows just how petty he can be. Plus, if you really read his quotes, he makes himself sound like he's an expert on the business of pro football when, in reality, he needs a good football mind to help make personnel and contract decisions while Danny just signs the checks.


Petty? How is that petty? He wants to put more FANS in the stadium. No it's not going to totally stop the fans of other teams who acquire tickets from coming in, but I'm glad that Snyder did it. Read some articles the Post prints about the Skins and you'll change your mind about this. Another thing, who cares if the Post and sports reporters are blasting them because of this? 5+ years of negative reporting was going to catch up with them sooner or later.

He makes himself sound like a good business man, not a football expert. Re-read the interview. "It's Joe's team, I just do the contracts." Would a football expert say something like that?

stwasm wrote:Of course, we have an owner who only wants Yes-Men around him.


I'm sorry but Snyder is JOE'S "Yes-Man". Not the other way around.

stwasm wrote:That's why we'll probably never win a Super Bowl under his watch!


This is pessimism at it's greatest. Snyder is what? 40 years old? The average life expectancy of a human being is something around 75-77 years old. So we have Dan running things for another 35 to 40 years. No Superbowls in that span? That's a pretty bold statement. I hope that you're wrong!
User avatar
stwasm
swine
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:44 pm

Post by stwasm »

EasyMoney wrote:
stwasm wrote:And the Post and the Sports Reporters are blasting the Redskins because of it. Snyder taking away those season tickets from the Post shows just how petty he can be. Plus, if you really read his quotes, he makes himself sound like he's an expert on the business of pro football when, in reality, he needs a good football mind to help make personnel and contract decisions while Danny just signs the checks.


Petty? How is that petty? He wants to put more FANS in the stadium. No it's not going to totally stop the fans of other teams who acquire tickets from coming in, but I'm glad that Snyder did it. Read some articles the Post prints about the Skins and you'll change your mind about this. Another thing, who cares if the Post and sports reporters are blasting them because of this? 5+ years of negative reporting was going to catch up with them sooner or later.

He makes himself sound like a good business man, not a football expert. Re-read the interview. "It's Joe's team, I just do the contracts." Would a football expert say something like that?

stwasm wrote:Of course, we have an owner who only wants Yes-Men around him.


I'm sorry but Snyder is JOE'S "Yes-Man". Not the other way around.

stwasm wrote:That's why we'll probably never win a Super Bowl under his watch!


This is pessimism at it's greatest. Snyder is what? 40 years old? The average life expectancy of a human being is something around 75-77 years old. So we have Dan running things for another 35 to 40 years. No Superbowls in that span? That's a pretty bold statement. I hope that you're wrong!


I'll take them one at a time:

He's mad that the Post reported on the obstructed-view seats and fans being made victims of an old bait-and-switch. What guy in his right mind even creates seats like that in a new stadium? Danny also didn't like any of the negative commentaries about him, even though all the Post did was speak the truth.

I understand that it's "Joe's team." But, Danny is still involved in contract negotiations when that task would be better suited being done by someone who knows more about the football business than he pretends to know. Just look at the Portis (Champ AND a second-rounder?!?) and Coles (made a trade that really didn't have to be made and threatened the guy to boot) trades! Plus, having Joe as GM will create friction with players who went to him and had their trade and/or raise request rejected.

I agree Joe isn't a yes-man. But, that bug-eyed flunkee Cerrato sure is!

I hope I'm wrong about a possible 30-40 year drought in between Super Bowl titles. But, Danny needs to change his ways and he needs to bring a GM in here.
User avatar
Hog Heaven
Hog
Posts: 366
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Harrisonburg/ Virginia Beach

Post by Hog Heaven »

EasyMoney wrote:
stwasm wrote:And the Post and the Sports Reporters are blasting the Redskins because of it. Snyder taking away those season tickets from the Post shows just how petty he can be. Plus, if you really read his quotes, he makes himself sound like he's an expert on the business of pro football when, in reality, he needs a good football mind to help make personnel and contract decisions while Danny just signs the checks.


Petty? How is that petty? He wants to put more FANS in the stadium. No it's not going to totally stop the fans of other teams who acquire tickets from coming in, but I'm glad that Snyder did it. Read some articles the Post prints about the Skins and you'll change your mind about this. Another thing, who cares if the Post and sports reporters are blasting them because of this? 5+ years of negative reporting was going to catch up with them sooner or later.

He makes himself sound like a good business man, not a football expert. Re-read the interview. "It's Joe's team, I just do the contracts." Would a football expert say something like that?

stwasm wrote:Of course, we have an owner who only wants Yes-Men around him.


I'm sorry but Snyder is JOE'S "Yes-Man". Not the other way around.

stwasm wrote:That's why we'll probably never win a Super Bowl under his watch!


This is pessimism at it's greatest. Snyder is what? 40 years old? The average life expectancy of a human being is something around 75-77 years old. So we have Dan running things for another 35 to 40 years. No Superbowls in that span? That's a pretty bold statement. I hope that you're wrong!


=D> :up: I couldn't have said it better! And I'm glad to see DS learns from his experiences! That + his enthusiasm for the skins... in 10 yrs he'll be the best owner in football
Romans 1:11 "For I wish that I myself were cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers..." Paul
User avatar
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~
Posts: 8496
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 3:12 pm
Location: Northern Virginia

Post by REDEEMEDSKIN »

"stwasm wrote:Danny needs to change his ways and he needs to bring a GM in here.


I believe Danny already addressed this issue in the transcript above. Read for yourself:

TWT: Why not give Vinny the GM title?

Snyder: Having a GM goes back to when the general manager ran the ticket office. He used to be like a CEO. Less than half the teams today have a GM. The majority of the coaches have the final say. New England and Philadelphia have a vice president of player personnel and no GM. We have the same structure.


While I'm not crazy about the current arrangement, the facts that Snyder provides re: our setup and how it is used around the league only help me become more optimistic about our FO's future. We need to be patient and let Joe do his work. We've finally begun our "overhaul" (no the Marty and Spurrier regime do not count), and we will again rise to respectability.

I'm lookin'forward to it. :up:

HTTR
Back and better than ever!
GoSkins
goskins
goskins
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 4:55 pm
Location: Hampden-Sydney, VA

Post by GoSkins »

stwasm wrote:
EasyMoney wrote:
stwasm wrote:
stwasm wrote:Of course, we have an owner who only wants Yes-Men around him.


I'm sorry but Snyder is JOE'S "Yes-Man". Not the other way around.

stwasm wrote:That's why we'll probably never win a Super Bowl under his watch!


This is pessimism at it's greatest. Snyder is what? 40 years old? The average life expectancy of a human being is something around 75-77 years old. So we have Dan running things for another 35 to 40 years. No Superbowls in that span? That's a pretty bold statement. I hope that you're wrong!


I'll take them one at a time:

He's mad that the Post reported on the obstructed-view seats and fans being made victims of an old bait-and-switch. What guy in his right mind even creates seats like that in a new stadium? Danny also didn't like any of the negative commentaries about him, even though all the Post did was speak the truth.
I understand that it's "Joe's team." But, Danny is still involved in contract negotiations when that task would be better suited being done by someone who knows more about the football business than he pretends to know. Just look at the Portis (Champ AND a second-rounder?!?) and Coles (made a trade that really didn't have to be made and threatened the guy to boot) trades! Plus, having Joe as GM will create friction with players who went to him and had their trade and/or raise request rejected.

I agree Joe isn't a yes-man. But, that bug-eyed flunkee Cerrato sure is!

I hope I'm wrong about a possible 30-40 year drought in between Super Bowl titles. But, Danny needs to change his ways and he needs to bring a GM in here.


I believe your views are in the minority. The Washington Post has made numerous mistakes in reporting on the Redskins. Snyder has every right to align himself with the Times. Joe Gibbs is running the Skins. Danny negotiates the contracts which takes the pressure off Gibbs. Let's see if this works. One season is not long enough to judge. Give them 2 more years. I think this will work. Gibbs seems to like it; why shouldn't you?
Last edited by GoSkins on Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
EasyMoney
Hog
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Germantown, Maryland

Post by EasyMoney »

stwasm wrote:He's mad that the Post reported on the obstructed-view seats and fans being made victims of an old bait-and-switch. What guy in his right mind even creates seats like that in a new stadium? Danny also didn't like any of the negative commentaries about him, even though all the Post did was speak the truth.


Well yea, I wouldn't be happy about that either. But I think he's more upset with the Post printing the WRONG roster cuts last year. That would piss me off too. The Post speaks the truth? Hmmmmm. Sally Jenkins is the first one that comes to mind. Sports reporting is all based on speculation and opinion, it's hardly the truth.

stwasm wrote:I understand that it's "Joe's team." But, Danny is still involved in contract negotiations when that task would be better suited being done by someone who knows more about the football business than he pretends to know. Just look at the Portis (Champ AND a second-rounder?!?) and Coles (made a trade that really didn't have to be made and threatened the guy to boot) trades! Plus, having Joe as GM will create friction with players who went to him and had their trade and/or raise request rejected.


Read the article again. It's a joint effort between Gibbs and Snyder on where players fit in with the cap. If it doesn't fit, they gotta go. I would have given you this argument two years ago, maybe even last year.

As far as the Portis for Bailey and a 2nd rounder trade, that is always going to be debatable. One thing that should be clear by now is that Gibbs doesn't want anyone to play here that doesn't want to play here. If you were Gibbs would you want Coles on your team this year? Why would Gibbs as a GM cause friction? I'm sure that at the end of every season from now on he'll address the team and tell everyone that wants out to come and see him. He'll do his best to make it happen. So what you're saying is that the franchise and their exec's should cater to the players... more? Nah, I think that's a bad idea. As far as needing to hire a GM. I think the personel decisions should be judged after this year. A Spurrier team to a Gibbs team is a very drastic change, would you agree? He has HIS team now. Let's see what happens this year.
User avatar
stwasm
swine
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:44 pm

Post by stwasm »

EasyMoney wrote:Why would Gibbs as a GM cause friction?


You need someone to be the "bad guy" when it comes to contracts. Say you're a player and I'm the coach AND GM. You approach me and you say you want to be traded. I tell you know, we can't do it under the cap, plus you have a contract. You stomp off mad, then when I give you plays to run, you're less likely to run them because you're still mad at me over a contract issue. That's what I'm talking about, and that's how the Coles issue blew up on us.
EasyMoney
Hog
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:02 pm
Location: Germantown, Maryland

Post by EasyMoney »

stwasm wrote:You need someone to be the "bad guy" when it comes to contracts. Say you're a player and I'm the coach AND GM. You approach me and you say you want to be traded. I tell you know, we can't do it under the cap, plus you have a contract. You stomp off mad, then when I give you plays to run, you're less likely to run them because you're still mad at me over a contract issue. That's what I'm talking about, and that's how the Coles issue blew up on us.


I understand what you're saying but I don't know if I follow you. Obviously you're still upset over Coles. Why, I don't know. He needed to go. He would've been a cancer in the locker room. What you don't seem to understand is that Gibbs is the boss. Coles was a player under Gibbs. Coles was being paid millions of dollars to catch footballs. He didn't like where he was catching them. Coles pulled one of the most selfish moves ever in my opinion. We don't need players like that in Washington. I'm also sure that Gibbs didn't want that. No one knew Coles was this type of person. We all found out didn't we? What would you rather have? Gibbs, a bad cap situation and no Coles or no Gibbs, a good cap situation and a locker room cancer? A GM would have probably done the same thing that Gibbs did in regards to Coles. The "bad guy" in this situation was Coles.

To get back on topic here, give it a little more time. In actuality you're approaching this entire thing the same way that Snyder used to. Patience is key and trust me, I'm not good at it either. But I'll give Gibbs the benefit of the doubt for obvious reasons.
hatsOFF2gibbs
^^
^^
Posts: 2005
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Northern VA

Post by hatsOFF2gibbs »

We should all re-evaluate our thoughts about Daniel Snyder. He's not a bad guy, he's an avid fan who REALLY cares about the Redskin organization.
I have some new respect for Mr. Snyder.
User avatar
Hog Heaven
Hog
Posts: 366
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Harrisonburg/ Virginia Beach

Post by Hog Heaven »

hatsOFF2gibbs wrote:We should all re-evaluate our thoughts about Daniel Snyder. He's not a bad guy, he's an avid fan who REALLY cares about the Redskin organization.
I have some new respect for Mr. Snyder.

=D> agreed
Romans 1:11 "For I wish that I myself were cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers..." Paul
User avatar
stwasm
swine
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:44 pm

Post by stwasm »

EasyMoney wrote:
stwasm wrote:You need someone to be the "bad guy" when it comes to contracts. Say you're a player and I'm the coach AND GM. You approach me and you say you want to be traded. I tell you know, we can't do it under the cap, plus you have a contract. You stomp off mad, then when I give you plays to run, you're less likely to run them because you're still mad at me over a contract issue. That's what I'm talking about, and that's how the Coles issue blew up on us.


I understand what you're saying but I don't know if I follow you. Obviously you're still upset over Coles. Why, I don't know. He needed to go. He would've been a cancer in the locker room. What you don't seem to understand is that Gibbs is the boss. Coles was a player under Gibbs. Coles was being paid millions of dollars to catch footballs. He didn't like where he was catching them. Coles pulled one of the most selfish moves ever in my opinion. We don't need players like that in Washington. I'm also sure that Gibbs didn't want that. No one knew Coles was this type of person. We all found out didn't we? What would you rather have? Gibbs, a bad cap situation and no Coles or no Gibbs, a good cap situation and a locker room cancer? A GM would have probably done the same thing that Gibbs did in regards to Coles. The "bad guy" in this situation was Coles.

To get back on topic here, give it a little more time. In actuality you're approaching this entire thing the same way that Snyder used to. Patience is key and trust me, I'm not good at it either. But I'll give Gibbs the benefit of the doubt for obvious reasons.


Here's my point about the Coles situation. The exact same thing is happening in Buffalo with Travis Henry. Is the Bills' staff panicking, deseparately trying to find a suitor, no matter what cap ramifications it may have? No, they're standing pat. If he wants to sit out, fine. Sit out, we'll move on until we can trade you. Up there, you have REAL football minds handling that situation while the coach is only concerning himself with on-the-field activities. I just feel like Coach Gibbs should just worry about that and not concern himself with personnel issues that could come back to haunt him.

As for my feelings about Snyder: if he can show me that he can remain in the background, not meddle in issues he knows nothing about and can really negotiate like a real football mind, then I'll be sold. Until then, I have to remain skeptical.
vtfootball07
Hog
Posts: 327
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 12:49 pm
Location: Blacksburg, VA

Post by vtfootball07 »

stwasm wrote:He's mad that the Post reported on the obstructed-view seats and fans being made victims of an old bait-and-switch. What guy in his right mind even creates seats like that in a new stadium?

Those seats had an obstructed-view because the stadium had to be structurally sound as far as I can tell. And on top of that, any season ticket holder getting those seats had the abiliity to go to FedEx and see if they wanted them or not. Lets not kid ourselves, the Post doesn't have the best track record when reporting on the Redskins this past year or so.
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ
Posts: 18385
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 10:23 pm
Location: New England

Post by SkinsJock »

stwasm wrote:.. Here's my point about the Coles situation. The exact same thing is happening in Buffalo with Travis Henry. Is the Bills' staff panicking, deseparately trying to find a suitor, no matter what cap ramifications it may have? No, they're standing pat. If he wants to sit out, fine. Sit out, we'll move on until we can trade you. Up there, you have REAL football minds handling that situation while the coach is only concerning himself with on-the-field activities. I just feel like Coach Gibbs should just worry about that and not concern himself with personnel issues that could come back to haunt him.


I do not think you have a very clear idea of how things are working here. To me it is obvious that our FO finally seems to have a very clear direction and plan both with the players and the business of football in the NFL. IMO we have seen some positive strides in the past 16 months and we will continue to do so. This is "working" - now if the on the field stuff gets in gear we will be a force again and soon.


stwasm wrote:.. As for my feelings about Snyder: if he can show me that he can remain in the background, not meddle in issues he knows nothing about and can really negotiate like a real football mind, then I'll be sold. Until then, I have to remain skeptical.


We have already seen (and heard) the evidence of that! The evidence is very clear to most of us.

Get on the bus! - it's moving!
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
User avatar
DaveSkin
piglet
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 2:19 pm
Location: Ashburn, VA - Skins HQ

Post by DaveSkin »

stwasm, sounds to me like nothing Snyder does will change your opinion of him. Did he make mistakes when he started his ownership of the Skins? Yes - and he admits that in the above interview. Do I think that he's doing a little creative rewriting of history (or at least re-interpreting it) in the interview? Yes, he is. But I feel much better about Dan Snyder as the owner of our team now. I think he's figuring out how to be an owner. He sounds like he has a little humility in him. Hell, I think when he started his role he was completely star struck with the players and now he's not as awestruck by being around these guys.

No one can argue that he cares deeply about the Redskins, nor that he's willing to spend whatever it takes to make them a successful football team. He brought back Joe Gibbs! I can't fault the man for trying.
Real fans don't need to be told when to make noise.
joebagadonuts
Mmmm...donuts
Mmmm...donuts
Posts: 2400
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 3:15 pm
Location: How much text will they let me fit in this 'Location' space? I mean, can I just keep writing and wr

Post by joebagadonuts »

vtfootball07 wrote:Those seats had an obstructed-view because the stadium had to be structurally sound as far as I can tell.


bah. columns are overrated. all they do is hold up the roof. big deal.
I'm a jack of all trades, the master of three
Rockin' the tables, rockin' the mikes, rockin' the young lay-dees.
User avatar
stwasm
swine
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 12:44 pm

Post by stwasm »

I guess I've just been frustrated over what I've seen since 1999. Yes, I finally see some "direction" with the club, even if it did result in our losing Fred Smoot and Antonio Pierce. Maybe I'm a little jaded and not willing to give Snyder a chance. Okay, I'll wait and see what happens. Thank you all for opening my eyes and I hope I haven't been too overbearing in my posts. :oops:

I just want to see the team win, that's all.
BringThePain!
Hog
Posts: 3887
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 11:49 pm
Location: inside the matrix... do not unplug

Post by BringThePain! »

stwasm wrote:I just want to see the team win, that's all.


We all do brother.. ;) ... frustration is just apart of losing for so long.... but I don't believe Danny has been ALL the problems..... he's not the one out there on the field, nor the one coaching them... ;)
**SPECIAL EDITION**

CurveBall - "It might be YOUR biggest game of the year but it really doesn't seem to be as big a deal for Dallas fans anymore."

Oopsies! What's that taste like?
General Failure
Hog
Posts: 3472
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Croydon, PA
Contact:

Post by General Failure »

So what you're saying is he should be more like Jerry Jones and try to coach the team himself.
I got your number. I steal your thunder. I got your mother's maiden name tattooed on my arm.
BringThePain!
Hog
Posts: 3887
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 11:49 pm
Location: inside the matrix... do not unplug

Post by BringThePain! »

General Failure wrote:So what you're saying is he should be more like Jerry Jones and try to coach the team himself.


No way bro... we've already seen that become a chicken dinner! :)
**SPECIAL EDITION**

CurveBall - "It might be YOUR biggest game of the year but it really doesn't seem to be as big a deal for Dallas fans anymore."

Oopsies! What's that taste like?
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

joebagadonuts wrote:
vtfootball07 wrote:Those seats had an obstructed-view because the stadium had to be structurally sound as far as I can tell.


bah. columns are overrated. all they do is hold up the roof. big deal.

What roof? This ain't Dallas, ya know! If we had a roof we could host the SB. Now, supporting the upper deck is another matter. :roll:
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
Post Reply