Cowboys top free-agency winners so far

Texas Hog · Post by **Texas Hog** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:02 pm

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/3443436

more puke loving :puke:

Redskins4Life · Post by **Redskins4Life** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 6:57 pm

Texas Hog wrote:http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/3443436

more puke loving

As much as I hate the Cowboys they are definitely the top free agency winners so far. Well after the Ravens signing of Rolle, theyre might be some competition, but Dallas still edges them out

joebagadonuts · Post by **joebagadonuts** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:16 pm

we were the free agent winners last year,and look how well we did.

Primetime42 · Post by **Primetime42** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:45 pm

joebagadonuts wrote:we were the free agent winners last year,and look how well we did.

But we're not mortgaging our future on this one; our draft picks stay with us and while we might be overpaying some, we're not doing it ridiculously. (See; 8.6 Mil Signing Bonuses to eventual backups)

welch · Post by **welch** » Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:51 pm

As we all said, modestly, last year: what does it mean to be declared off-season free-agent winners?

joebagadonuts · Post by **joebagadonuts** » Tue Mar 08, 2005 2:26 pm

i won't argue about brunell. i didn't like the trade when it happened, and i sure don't like what it did to our cap freedom (or lack thereof). but only time will tell if the 'boys have mortgaged their future or not this offseason.

The Hogster · Post by **The Hogster** » Tue Mar 08, 2005 4:06 pm

The only people who think games are bought through free agency are media people, and casual fans. This is not baseball where there is no salary cap. You can't buy wins in football...we just now stopped trying to do that thanks to Gibbs. I like our offseason

Primetime42 · Post by **Primetime42** » Tue Mar 08, 2005 5:24 pm

Besides, it's way too early to declare an "offseason winner" on March 8th.

FanofallthatisGibbs · Fri Mar 11, 2005 11:46 am

Offseason Winner = instability = More losses than your team wants to have...

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:48 pm

Primetime42 wrote:Besides, it's way too early to declare an "offseason winner" on March 8th.

Do I detect a hint of trepidation? This is like the SI cover jinx. We want you to be the winner. I mean we dont want you popping corks or anything but be prepared to wear the mantle proudly.

Must be a bit disconcerting though to have Marco's back surgery interfering with all the celebrations down there.

Primetime42 · Post by **Primetime42** » Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:55 pm

Trepidation?

IT'S MARCH!!!

Call someone an offseason winner AT LEAST AFTER THE DRAFT!!

Why would you compare it to the SI Jinx? The only reason it seems the past "off-season winners" have crashed and burned is because...

Well, you guys have managed to be "off-season champs" for the past 3-4 years.

General Failure · Post by **General Failure** » Fri Mar 11, 2005 3:06 pm

Silly, after the draft is when you declare the draft winner.

Primetime42 · Post by **Primetime42** » Fri Mar 11, 2005 3:17 pm

General Failure wrote:Silly, after the draft is when you declare the draft winner.

Fruits on that.

I for one still am leery of the way Jerry Jones runs drafts.

Even though we've hit on our last three top choices

General Failure · Post by **General Failure** » Fri Mar 11, 2005 3:38 pm

It could be worse. You could have Mike Tice running your draft.

Primetime42 · Post by **Primetime42** » Fri Mar 11, 2005 3:56 pm

General Failure wrote:It could be worse. You could have Mike Tice running your draft.

Or the owner could be like Red and not give a _____

SkinsJock · Post by **SkinsJock** » Fri Mar 11, 2005 5:06 pm

Now what is up with that situation? Is this deal close to going down or what? This really sucks if your a viking fan!

1niksder · Post by **1niksder** » Sun Mar 13, 2005 2:43 pm

Primetime42 wrote:
General Failure wrote:It could be worse. You could have Mike Tice running your draft.
Or the owner could be like Red and not give a _____

Got rid of Moss(who missed 5 games last year) for a needed MLB and the #7 overall pick
Added Pat Williams to the DL
Picked up Smoot to play corner coner
Signed Shaper to play Saftey and weaken a divisional rival
and they are still talking to the Jags about Donavin Darious for the pther S spot

I'd have to say the Vikes have made the biggest strides in free agency.

never to one to speak kindly about that team in Texas I have to admit they have made some very good moves early, and adding D. Howard would move them back ahead of Minny :cry:

(until I can come up with another angle :lol:

)

spudstr04 · Post by **spudstr04** » Wed Mar 16, 2005 2:16 pm

NO WAY!!!!! cardinals are definetley the winners: they've added Kurt Warner, who won 5 out of 7 games last year as a starter, they've added a great new nucleus of young defensive talent....they have money and they're spending it well.....and since i am a skins fan, i would never say that the cowboys are winners....

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Cowboys top free-agency winners so far

Cowboys top free-agency winners so far

Re: Cowboys top free-agency winners so far