Page 1 of 1

Patrick Ramsey's 40 Time, And Review

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:10 pm
by Clinton Portis
40-time: 5.24


See! Patrick isnt THAT slow! Now if we can get that time up...he might be able to scramble for some yards this coming season. I know its no where close to REALLY fast, but he's probaly a bit slower than average. They need him doing cardio at camp to churn out some yards! :shock:

Oh yeah he's a review of him:
Positives: Well-proportioned frame with broad shoulders…Has a quick release and a live arm with excellent velocity on his deep tosses…Sets up fluidly with good balance and footwork…Poised under pressure, showing toughness stepping up in the pocket…Goes through progressions and does a nice job reading defenses…Shows power and snap in his release, delivering with proper over-the-top mechanics.

Negatives: Needs to work on his footwork setting up in the pocket, as he is not always quick to reach his drop/set point…Needs to show more patience when under pressure, as he will loft the ball into traffic every now and then…Lacks a soft touch, as he puts too much power behind his short throws (they are accurate, though)…Has trouble following through with his release when forced out of the pocket.

REMINDS ME OF…JAY FIEDLER, Miami Dolphins: Like Fiedler, he's good, but never will be great. Much like Fiedler, he will frustrate his coach with his poor field decisions and penchant for throwing the ball into traffic.

Re: Patrick Ramsey's 40 Time, And Review

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:14 pm
by BringThePain!
Clinton Portis wrote:
40-time: 5.24


See! Patrick isnt THAT slow! Now if we can get that time up...he might be able to scramble for some yards this coming season. I know its no where close to REALLY fast, but he's probaly a bit slower than average. They need him doing cardio at camp to churn out some yards! :shock:


yeah... but he did that running backwards... it's like 10.5 or more running fowards...;)

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:28 pm
by Jeff Rhodes
Just for laughs, go back and find out what the same scouting service said about Tom Brady

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 8:51 pm
by Clinton Portis
Tom Brady

STRENGTHS: Plays with great confidence and is an exceptional leader on the field. Finds ways to win big games, Shows outstanding touch in the short-to-intermediate passing game. Has a quick release, does a good job of recognizing the blitz and handles pressure extremely well. Finds the open man when given time. Spreads the ball around. Has solid ball skills, including a good play-fake. Isn't afraid to take some chances downfield and has become more aggressive. Plays with great intensity.

WEAKNESSES: Lacks ideal quickness. Forces the ball into coverage at times and tries to make too much happen. Doesn't have ideal arm strength; some of his downfield passes sail. Doesn't get great velocity on his vertical passes.

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:21 pm
by Redskins4Life
I guess they were right about Tom's knack to win the big game... And wow, 5.24??!?!? I'm 15 years old and I run a 4.9 what the hell is wrong with Patrick??

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:31 pm
by Clinton Portis
I dunno he needs to do exercises or SOMETHING!

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:37 pm
by Brandon777
he will frustrate his coach with his poor field decisions and penchant for throwing the ball into traffic.
He will also frustrate the fans watching the game. Hopefully he'll get better. Being compared to Fiedler isn't cool.

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 10:23 pm
by Clinton Portis
Being compared to Fiedler isn't cool


Your telling me! :shock:

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 10:59 pm
by SKINSLOVER
im 14 and i run a 4.5 <<<<< track star at my skoo

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:02 pm
by air_hog
my grandma could run a 4.5

try beating a 3.7

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:21 pm
by ii7-V7
Dude I run a 2.75 in my sleep! :o

2.75 to the fridge during commercial breaks.

You should see me shuttle between the fridge and the cupboard!

Chad

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:24 pm
by BossHog
I run a 5.9 having a smoke.

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:26 pm
by tcwest10
I think this will clear things up a little.
http://www.the-hogs.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=11472
See ? That's how we timed him.

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 2:14 am
by frankcal20
I Think Gibbs and I would tie. He's in better shape than i am.

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 2:38 am
by Scottskins
where are those quotes from CP?

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:51 am
by Clinton Portis
Assorted Places, I Just Googled Patrick Ramsey 40 time, and Tom Brady Scouting Review.

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:45 pm
by spudstr04
Clinton Portis wrote:
Being compared to Fiedler isn't cool


At least Fiedler has led his team to the playoffs......

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 2:12 pm
by Texas Hog
that's about what Tom Arnold ran the other night on Best Damn....sad! If that is accurate, PRAM needs some serious work.

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:48 pm
by Redskins4Life
SKINSLOVER wrote:im 14 and i run a 4.5 <<<<< track star at my skoo


If you ran a 4.5 at age 14 you would be the second coming of Darrell Green which I can guarantee you you're not

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:58 pm
by trey53
If you ran a 4.5 at age 14 you would be the second coming of Darrell Green which I can guarantee you you're not


I believe Darrell was clocked at a 4.42 when he was 40 so the kid has a few tenths of a second to make up. But I knew a guy in High school who was 15 and ran a 4.33 40. So it can be done...most guys who run that fast are track athletes. This guy played football too but I don't think everything ever came of it...

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:30 pm
by General Failure
spudstr04 wrote:
Clinton Portis wrote:
Being compared to Fiedler isn't cool


At least Fiedler has led his team to the playoffs......


It's a very fine line between leading and being carried by a RB.

Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:03 pm
by Hooligan
Don't forget, track athletes are generally pretty lean and don't have to bulk up to play a contact sport. A 6' 160lb runner had better be faster than a 6' 190lb football player :)

Re: Patrick Ramsey's 40 Time, And Review

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:48 am
by Deadskins
Positives: …Sets up fluidly with good balance and footwork…Poised under pressure, showing toughness stepping up in the pocket…

Negatives: Needs to work on his footwork setting up in the pocket… Needs to show more patience when under pressure…

So which one is it?

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:50 am
by JansenFan
You'll have to ask the heavy-set thin guy over there.