We Will Pick #9 in the 2005 Draft

Washington Football Game Day discussions for 2003, 2004, and 2005
Locked
JPM36
####
####
Posts: 1885
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 12:41 am
Location: Las Vegas, NV

We Will Pick #9 in the 2005 Draft

Post by JPM36 »

This according to the sportsline.com.

It looks like if we had lost yesterday we would've been picking 5th, right back where we were in 2004.

2005 Draft Order

1 San Francisco
2 Miami
3 Cleveland
4 Chicago
5 Tampa Bay
6 Tennessee
7 Oakland
8 Arizona
9 Washington
10 Detroit
11 Dallas
12 N.Y. Giants*
13 Houston
14 Carolina
15 Kansas City
16 New Orleans
17 Cincinnati
18 Buffalo**
19 Jacksonville
20 Baltimore

* Traded to San Diego
** Traded to Dallas
R.I.P. Christopher Wallace (May 21, 1972 - March 9, 1997)

R.I.P. Sean Taylor (April 1, 1983 - November 27, 2007)
curveball
Hog
Posts: 877
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 10:33 pm

Post by curveball »

The Redskins pick is correct, but sportsline is incorrect on the second Dallas pick. They'll pick at #20 unless St.Louis or Minnesota make the Super Bowl which will drop it to #19.
This space reserved for BTP......If he ever wins it.
JPM36
####
####
Posts: 1885
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 12:41 am
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Post by JPM36 »

Yeah you're right.

I think sportsline was just ranking the nonplayoff teams.

It's a good thing Buffalo went on that late season run. For a while there I was afraid Dallas was going to be receiving a top 5 pick from them.
R.I.P. Christopher Wallace (May 21, 1972 - March 9, 1997)

R.I.P. Sean Taylor (April 1, 1983 - November 27, 2007)
curveball
Hog
Posts: 877
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 10:33 pm

Post by curveball »

Yea, it kinda stinks for us that Buffalo's pick isn't any higher, but I'll gladly take Julius Jones AND this years #20 (plus Ryan, a fairly decent blocking TE) over anyone that was available with #22 last year.


I'll be surprised if Washington stays at #9 this year. I expect a tradedown for an interior lineman or WR. I just don't see any worth that pick. Mike Williams is the wildcard though. We'll see how he runs.

Depends on FA, but so many teams have so much more cap space, I don't see Washington getting into much big spending.
This space reserved for BTP......If he ever wins it.
John Manfreda
Hog
Posts: 2078
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 3:52 pm
Location: none
Contact:

Post by John Manfreda »

You guys had the 17th last year.
User avatar
Primetime42
Hog
Posts: 1727
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2003 12:09 am
Location: Romo-sexual

Post by Primetime42 »

NO sir, we had 22
"He's a playmaker, that's his label. They used to have strong safeties, but now they got another position: They're called playmakers." -Terence Newman on Roy Williams
User avatar
Cooley47
Hog
Posts: 347
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 9:01 pm
Location: Redskinz Country!!!

Post by Cooley47 »

Thank God for Buffalo.....

The Skins will be able to draft a high caliber player....not as good as Taylor but no one in the draft is that good
I miss you 21.

God I wish we had a second round pick.
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

Primetime42 wrote:NO sir, we had 22

sure did
Buffalo traded its 2005 first round pick to Dallas so the Bills could select J.P. Losman with the 22nd pick.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Locked