The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

flamethrower wrote:

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.

After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL

He was the starter even if Stoudt had to fill in for him, that's like saying Hostetler
gets credit for the Giants win, when Simms that year was the starter

I figured out how Roethlessberger was actually the starter, and not Bradshaw. Big Ben is actually Dr.Who . The Time lord. That is how He pulled that off.
And, After watching the Super Bowl highlight dvd's for both 13,and 14. Funny how that guy starting looked nothing like Roethlessberger. But, looked exactly like Bradshaw. Still waiting for the troll to admit that he made a mistake.

It's funny how he continually wishes a ring off the finger of a athlete who
was part of a team, earning him that right to achieve it, regardless if he
carried a clip board, worked with the secondary team, Held for FG's or
extra points or even was somehow part of the special teams

the ring doesn't come off!!! it's not going to vanish, now Dorothy keep
clicking those magic ruby red heels togethers and repeat

I'm such a fraud, I am an attention whore, I continually know nothing
about football

thanks for playing

Still waiting for the troll to explain how someone not even born at the time. Born 1982 could have 2 super bowl rings from super bowls 13 and 14. Both took place before the person was born. When the troll can explain this in a way that makes sense. He might make a point. But, because he stated that Big Ben was the quarterback of the Steelers from 77-82. Proves that the troll don't know any thing at all.

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL

I was born way before 82, and doesn't matter how he got them the point is? That when
the pressure is on to explain how the rings the person question has is relevant? he
flounders because he has no clue as to the validity he just throws crap against the
wall spams the same thing over and over again

proving he fails to watch football, let alone understand it

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error.

You go ahead and rewatch all the super bowls you want, you'll never understand them because
they don't involve anything related to Houston

Flamethrower - arguments inconsistent, ignorance stays the same

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error.
Now the troll just made another error. Just because they have yet to have a super bowl played in Hartford Ct. He assumes that they have never ever played one in Houston Texas. How wrong can a troll be? The last one. Super Bowl 51 was played in Houston. That alone would prove the troll wrong. But, Super Bowl 38 was also played there. Along with Super Bowl 8. I bet the troll thinks that the world is flat, and the Sun revolves around the earth, and the earth is the center of the universe.
Because hosting a game involves the city that they are being played in.

Nobody cares where it was played it's about who won it? which hint, hint didn't involve any Houston
team be it! the Oiler's or Texans neither can say they've ascended to the mountain top of success
so again we ask the burning question

what does he know about success? nothing, he can quote who he wants, Look
at super bowls, even dig into the ancient dead past of NFL history, None of it
even remotely matters because in the end he'll always be wrong

carry on

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error.
Now the troll just made another error. Just because they have yet to have a super bowl played in Hartford Ct. He assumes that they have never ever played one in Houston Texas. How wrong can a troll be? The last one. Super Bowl 51 was played in Houston. That alone would prove the troll wrong. But, Super Bowl 38 was also played there. Along with Super Bowl 8. I bet the troll thinks that the world is flat, and the Sun revolves around the earth, and the earth is the center of the universe.
Because hosting a game involves the city that they are being played in.

The point is? you talk out of your ass and waffle, first you asked if Stoudt was a champion
(2) rings? answer - Yes, then you go off on a lunatic rant, about who he played for? then
rant about other players and there records. when in the end, The records aren't of any
importance

super bowls or NOT followed by, Validity? None that you can answer because it takes
actually having a super bowl winning franchise, In order to understand what it means
to be an actual champion.

now run along little fraud you don't belong in a thread that talks about champions

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error.
Now the troll just made another error. Just because they have yet to have a super bowl played in Hartford Ct. He assumes that they have never ever played one in Houston Texas. How wrong can a troll be? The last one. Super Bowl 51 was played in Houston. That alone would prove the troll wrong. But, Super Bowl 38 was also played there. Along with Super Bowl 8. I bet the troll thinks that the world is flat, and the Sun revolves around the earth, and the earth is the center of the universe.
Because hosting a game involves the city that they are being played in.

I'm gonna try to put this thread back on topic. Romo ain't a hall of famer. He don't have the numba's dat matta.

Romo does have the #'s no titles and he's not done playing so time only tells
if he gets in or not

I'm gonna try to put this thread back on topic. Romo ain't a hall of famer. He don't have the numba's dat matta.

Stats? Yes, Titles? NO

I'm gonna try to put this thread back on topic. Romo ain't a hall of famer. He don't have the numba's dat matta. Unless it's numba of times giving Jerrah Gloryhole service.

Remember you don't have to be super in order to be mediocre, you just have to
be mediocre and that is good enough

I'm gonna try to put this thread back on topic. Romo ain't a hall of famer. He don't have the numba's dat matta. Unless it's numba of times giving Jerrah Gloryhole service.

Remember you don't have to be super in order to be mediocre, you just have to
be mediocre and that is good enough

I'm gonna try to put this thread back on topic. Romo ain't a hall of famer. He don't have the numba's dat matta. Unless it's numba of times giving Jerrah Gloryhole service.

Remember you don't have to be super in order to be mediocre, you just have to
be mediocre and that is good enough

I'm gonna try to put this thread back on topic. Romo ain't a hall of famer. He don't have the numba's dat matta. Unless it's numba of times giving Jerrah Gloryhole service.