Clinton Portis, Mike Vick, and the Washington Redskins

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:18 pm

skinsfan#33 wrote:
BossHog wrote:Hello Mr. Dead Horse...

... do you mind if we flog you some more?

That's a good one, but not as good as this:

Lets just "let sleeping dogs lie"

Dog-gone-it, that was funny.

Smithian · Post by **Smithian** » Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:54 am

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
skinsfan#33 wrote:
BossHog wrote:Hello Mr. Dead Horse...

... do you mind if we flog you some more?

That's a good one, but not as good as this:

Lets just "let sleeping dogs lie"

Dog-gone-it, that was funny.

I'm between taking offense or finding it humorous.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sat Jul 21, 2007 8:00 pm

You know it was funny.

SCSkinsFan · Post by **SCSkinsFan** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:19 pm

Last weekend ESPN had poll asking which was the most dispicable transgression. The NBA Ref, Tim Donaghy, having ties to gambling and the Mafia, or Michael Vick being involved wwith and having ties to illegal dog-fighting. If someone voted for the the NBA Ref does that mean that they are condoning and approving of Michael Vick's actions? I think not. Both are dispicable in their own right. The only way to reply to that poll is to just not reply.

I think the orignal poster is essentially making a similar analogy. Unfortunately his logic is slightly skewed.