Page 2 of 2

Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 11:10 am
by Countertrey
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
Redskin in Canada wrote:Most people are playing conservatively following the odds this year. The winner will be defined as the Hognosticator who takes calculated and informed picks AGAINST the spread.

Some posters are already taking this calculated risk, their attempt evened out this week but I salute their effort. Good strategy.


Personally I take fewer risks earlier in the year as I'm trying to get a feel for the teams. Picking upsets before getting the feel seldom in my view pays off overall. But as the season goes on you're right if you want to win you gotta pick upsets.


Correct. This is a 16 game season... a marathon, not a sprint. Too many variables to look outside the CW at this point.

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:47 pm
by Redskin in Canada
Countertrey wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
Redskin in Canada wrote:Most people are playing conservatively following the odds this year. The winner will be defined as the Hognosticator who takes calculated and informed picks AGAINST the spread.

Some posters are already taking this calculated risk, their attempt evened out this week but I salute their effort. Good strategy.


Personally I take fewer risks earlier in the year as I'm trying to get a feel for the teams. Picking upsets before getting the feel seldom in my view pays off overall. But as the season goes on you're right if you want to win you gotta pick upsets.


Correct. This is a 16 game season... a marathon, not a sprint. Too many variables to look outside the CW at this point.

Somebody could have benefitted from an early departure from the "conventional wisdom" on week 3. But it would have been a fluke to make those guesses. This is a good and close race at the top always. My feeling is that whoever departs earlier and accurately from some games against the spread would have a good chance to win this competition.

Emphasis on EARLIER -and- ACCURATELY :roll:

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 8:44 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
Hey now I had my best weeks last week and this week.. Besides the colts not getting it done like I thought after a decent game vs the steelers I liked my picks this week. Cards get unlucky call that woulda helped my case a lot too. I'm a newbie at hognos but I think u gotta pick two close upsets at least each week right? I guess close games and upsets are different so idk maybe I'm playing safe too

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:42 pm
by SkinsJock
I try to just pick the teams I think will win

but ... different strokes for different folks ... :lol:

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:24 am
by Redskin in Canada
SkinsJock wrote:I try to just pick the teams I think will win

but ... different strokes for different folks ... :lol:

REdeemed picks the wrong ones on purpose too. 8)

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:06 am
by SkinsJock
Redskin in Canada wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:I try to just pick the teams I think will win

but ... different strokes for different folks ... :lol:

Redeemed picks the wrong ones on purpose too. 8)


OH BOY! :lol: - it's the bye week, time for a little fun

TRO does have a certain skill set for that though, doesn't he :lol:

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 9:23 am
by KazooSkinsFan
SkinsJock wrote:
Redskin in Canada wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:I try to just pick the teams I think will win

but ... different strokes for different folks ... :lol:

Redeemed picks the wrong ones on purpose too. 8)


OH BOY! :lol: - it's the bye week, time for a little fun

TRO does have a certain skill set for that though, doesn't he :lol:


TRO picks the right teams, but he's always going back and forth between this and his alternate reality and mixes them up

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:36 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:
Redskin in Canada wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:I try to just pick the teams I think will win

but ... different strokes for different folks ... :lol:

Redeemed picks the wrong ones on purpose too. 8)


OH BOY! :lol: - it's the bye week, time for a little fun

TRO does have a certain skill set for that though, doesn't he :lol:


TRO picks the right teams, but he's always going back and forth between this and his alternate reality and mixes them up


Yep...that explains this year's slow start. :wink:

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 2:39 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
*initiates pissing contest*

I went 10-6 this week (by my count). What about you guys?

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 3:08 pm
by Deadskins
11-5

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 3:12 pm
by MDSKINSFAN
13-3 by my count.

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 3:29 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:*initiates pissing contest*

I went 10-6 this week (by my count). What about you guys?


Yep, I had you going 10-6 too...

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:38 pm
by SkinsJock
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:*initiates pissing contest*
I went 10-6 this week (by my count). What about you guys?

Yep, I had you going 10-6 too...


roger that TRO - I have you at 10-6 too ..... :roll:

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 5:38 pm
by SAP_Pete
11-5. can't catch up like that after my dismal first week.

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 6:06 pm
by andyjens89
13-3 i think

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 7:17 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
Dang 13- is good guys... Stupid Az and indy killed me but both had a good chance jus couldn't get it done. So long as pukes loose skins win great week fecals go down makes it better jus needed the gnats to loose to make it a perfect week

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:47 pm
by Redskin in Canada
13 - 3 with a bunch of other Hognosticators

Just keeping up with the Joneses :lol:

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 9:22 pm
by Countertrey
Think I'm 12-4...



But I have TRO at 10-18.

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 9:25 pm
by Hoss
Week 4 Results:
1.
Redskin in Canada 13-3
2.
Warmother 13-3
3.
KazooSkinsFan 13-3
4.
DesertSkin 13-3
5.
MDSKINSFAN 13-3
6.
andyjens89 13-3
7.
ChrisHanburger 12-4
8.
BigRedskinDaddy 12-4
9.
Hoss 12-4
10.
Countertrey 11-5
11.
vwoodzpusha 11-5
12.
tribeofjudah 11-5
13.
Punu 11-5
14.
Deadskins 11-5
15.
SkinsJock 11-5
16.
DarthMonk 11-5
17.
cowboykillerzRED 11-5
18.
SAP_Pete 11-5
19.
REDEEMEDSKIN 10-6
20.
1niksder 8-8

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 9:31 pm
by Countertrey
or, not.

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2011 9:47 pm
by Hoss
Countertrey wrote:or, not.


well, i thought i was 16-0........... :-k