The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error. You as a team stop thinking high of someone after pulling him in the first season after he plays less than 4 games, and don't win a single one. Epic Fail on this troll's claim that Stoudt was a winner as a starting quarterback in the NFL. Those 2 Super Bowl titles were won by Bradshaw. Who took every single snap in both games. When the troll admits that it made a mistake. I let this go. Or, Is Roethlessberger also Dr.Who. Or did he find some time dialation crystals?
Let me add 1 more point. Stoudt had a record of 0 wins and 4 losses in 3 years with the Cardinals. Would anyone with a brain call that a winning record. And his record as a Starter for the Steelers was 9 wins and 6 losses. The Steelers won 10 games that year. An injured Bradshaw came off the bench to beat the Jets in the last game ever played in New York City.
The troll just has to admit that Bradshaw, not Roethlessberger was the Steelers quarterback during Super Bowl 13, and 14. It does this. I stop reminding it of it's stupid comment about Roethlessberger being Stoudt's predecessor in Pittsburgh.
When the troll admits that he was totally wrong on who Stoudt backed up in Pittsburgh by naming him. I drop the issue.

Same lame spam, same clueless commentary just exactly are you good for again?
that's right attention whoring

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error. You as a team stop thinking high of someone after pulling him in the first season after he plays less than 4 games, and don't win a single one. Epic Fail on this troll's claim that Stoudt was a winner as a starting quarterback in the NFL. Those 2 Super Bowl titles were won by Bradshaw. Who took every single snap in both games. When the troll admits that it made a mistake. I let this go. Or, Is Roethlessberger also Dr.Who. Or did he find some time dialation crystals?
Let me add 1 more point. Stoudt had a record of 0 wins and 4 losses in 3 years with the Cardinals. Would anyone with a brain call that a winning record. And his record as a Starter for the Steelers was 9 wins and 6 losses. The Steelers won 10 games that year. An injured Bradshaw came off the bench to beat the Jets in the last game ever played in New York City.
The troll just has to admit that Bradshaw, not Roethlessberger was the Steelers quarterback during Super Bowl 13, and 14. It does this. I stop reminding it of it's stupid comment about Roethlessberger being Stoudt's predecessor in Pittsburgh.
When the troll admits that he was totally wrong on who Stoudt backed up in Pittsburgh by naming him. I drop the issue.

owning you is that damn easy

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error. You as a team stop thinking high of someone after pulling him in the first season after he plays less than 4 games, and don't win a single one. Epic Fail on this troll's claim that Stoudt was a winner as a starting quarterback in the NFL. Those 2 Super Bowl titles were won by Bradshaw. Who took every single snap in both games. When the troll admits that it made a mistake. I let this go. Or, Is Roethlessberger also Dr.Who. Or did he find some time dialation crystals?
Let me add 1 more point. Stoudt had a record of 0 wins and 4 losses in 3 years with the Cardinals. Would anyone with a brain call that a winning record. And his record as a Starter for the Steelers was 9 wins and 6 losses. The Steelers won 10 games that year. An injured Bradshaw came off the bench to beat the Jets in the last game ever played in New York City.
The troll just has to admit that Bradshaw, not Roethlessberger was the Steelers quarterback during Super Bowl 13, and 14. It does this. I stop reminding it of it's stupid comment about Roethlessberger being Stoudt's predecessor in Pittsburgh.
When the troll admits that he was totally wrong on who Stoudt backed up in Pittsburgh by naming him. I drop the issue.

Same lame spam, same clueless commentary just exactly are you good for again?
that's right attention whoring

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error. You as a team stop thinking high of someone after pulling him in the first season after he plays less than 4 games, and don't win a single one. Epic Fail on this troll's claim that Stoudt was a winner as a starting quarterback in the NFL. Those 2 Super Bowl titles were won by Bradshaw. Who took every single snap in both games. When the troll admits that it made a mistake. I let this go. Or, Is Roethlessberger also Dr.Who. Or did he find some time dialation crystals?
Let me add 1 more point. Stoudt had a record of 0 wins and 4 losses in 3 years with the Cardinals. Would anyone with a brain call that a winning record. And his record as a Starter for the Steelers was 9 wins and 6 losses. The Steelers won 10 games that year. An injured Bradshaw came off the bench to beat the Jets in the last game ever played in New York City.
The troll just has to admit that Bradshaw, not Roethlessberger was the Steelers quarterback during Super Bowl 13, and 14. It does this. I stop reminding it of it's stupid comment about Roethlessberger being Stoudt's predecessor in Pittsburgh.
When the troll admits that he was totally wrong on who Stoudt backed up in Pittsburgh by naming him. I drop the issue.

just exactly are you good for again?
that's right attention whoring

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error. You as a team stop thinking high of someone after pulling him in the first season after he plays less than 4 games, and don't win a single one. Epic Fail on this troll's claim that Stoudt was a winner as a starting quarterback in the NFL. Those 2 Super Bowl titles were won by Bradshaw. Who took every single snap in both games. When the troll admits that it made a mistake. I let this go. Or, Is Roethlessberger also Dr.Who. Or did he find some time dialation crystals?
Let me add 1 more point. Stoudt had a record of 0 wins and 4 losses in 3 years with the Cardinals. Would anyone with a brain call that a winning record. And his record as a Starter for the Steelers was 9 wins and 6 losses. The Steelers won 10 games that year. An injured Bradshaw came off the bench to beat the Jets in the last game ever played in New York City.
The troll just has to admit that Bradshaw, not Roethlessberger was the Steelers quarterback during Super Bowl 13, and 14. It does this. I stop reminding it of it's stupid comment about Roethlessberger being Stoudt's predecessor in Pittsburgh.
When the troll admits that he was totally wrong on who Stoudt backed up in Pittsburgh by naming him. I drop the issue.

Yet has 2 rings, which is again something no player in Houston history can say
they have, Nor will ever have

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error. You as a team stop thinking high of someone after pulling him in the first season after he plays less than 4 games, and don't win a single one. Epic Fail on this troll's claim that Stoudt was a winner as a starting quarterback in the NFL. Those 2 Super Bowl titles were won by Bradshaw. Who took every single snap in both games. When the troll admits that it made a mistake. I let this go. Or, Is Roethlessberger also Dr.Who. Or did he find some time dialation crystals?
Let me add 1 more point. Stoudt had a record of 0 wins and 4 losses in 3 years with the Cardinals. Would anyone with a brain call that a winning record. And his record as a Starter for the Steelers was 9 wins and 6 losses. The Steelers won 10 games that year. An injured Bradshaw came off the bench to beat the Jets in the last game ever played in New York City.
The troll just has to admit that Bradshaw, not Roethlessberger was the Steelers quarterback during Super Bowl 13, and 14. It does this. I stop reminding it of it's stupid comment about Roethlessberger being Stoudt's predecessor in Pittsburgh.
When the troll admits that he was totally wrong on who Stoudt backed up in Pittsburgh by naming him. I drop the issue.
Stoudt as a starter had 0 wins after leaving the Steelers. Funny how the troll thinks that what done as an understudy over rules what is done as the man. Head Coach, or Starting player.

It's gotta be tough when? all you can do is bandwagon, then deny their accomplishments
proving you know nothing of this game attention whore

There is no productive exchange occurring in this NON-SMACK thread. locking