Page 6 of 8

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:25 am
by Burgundy&Wha?
From now on, let's call Rex Grossman RG3Int. So let it be written....

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:48 pm
by 1niksder
Red_One43 wrote:
Of course the starting QB for opening day has been chosen. IT's RGIII - that's Rex Grossman, The Third Year, that is! :(


Rex is a 3rd, his Dad is a Jr. his Grand dad was Sr.

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:24 pm
by Red_One43
1niksder wrote:
Red_One43 wrote:
Of course the starting QB for opening day has been chosen. IT's RGIII - that's Rex Grossman, The Third Year, that is! :(


Rex is a 3rd, his Dad is a Jr. his Grand dad was Sr.


Looks like we had RGIII all along. :) :(

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:35 pm
by DarthMonk
Burgundy&Wha? wrote:From now on, let's call Rex Grossman RG3Int. So let it be written....


... so let it be done!

Image

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:38 pm
by DarthMonk
elprez19 wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:My 2 cents

Surely EVERYBODY with any knowledge knows that neither Grossman or Beck are starting the next regular season game in B&G
THIS IS NOT NEWS



The Redskins will most likely have a FA QB starting here

The Redskins will most likely be getting a QB in the draft that they can get ready to start here

The Redskins will most likely trade down ... NOT up


Yes Sherlock, hopefully neither will be starting but the rumor is that the front office knows WHO will be starting. Yes its a rumor but one that would be nice to hear if its validated. Having the confidence in who they want and the plan on how to get him this early would be exciting


The very prospect has me all atwitter! :roll:

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 10:06 pm
by riggofan
SkinsJock wrote:let me make it a little clearer for some of the slower fans hereit's not 'hopefully' - NEITHER Grossman or Beck will be starting - END OF THAT deal - guaranteed :roll:


I agree with your opinion. Its just not a "fact" until both of those guys are off the roster.

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 11:15 pm
by cowboyhater4life
riggofan wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:let me make it a little clearer for some of the slower fans hereit's not 'hopefully' - NEITHER Grossman or Beck will be starting - END OF THAT deal - guaranteed :roll:


I agree with your opinion. Its just not a "fact" until both of those guys are off the roster.



Neither Beck or Grossman will be starting but they could be battling for back up. By default Rex gets the job because of his history in the system. There are way too many options out there from Payton to RGIII to let Beck or Rex start.

RGIII to start

I like Chandler Harnish in the 6th to battle with Grossman and Beck

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 1:44 pm
by StorminMormon86
That news story makes no sense, because there's no guarantee (if Greene was referring to acquiring a QB via the draft) that the guy we want will be there come our pick.

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 1:54 pm
by Deadskins
StorminMormon86 wrote:That news story makes no sense, because there's no guarantee (if Greene was referring to acquiring a QB via the draft) that the guy we want will be there come our pick.

Unless they've already made a trade deal, but are waiting to announce it. But to your point, that's why I thought this story hinted that the Skins might be looking at a FA pickup, rather than drafting their next QB.

Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 10:03 am
by StorminMormon86
Deadskins wrote:Unless they've already made a trade deal, but are waiting to announce it. But to your point, that's why I thought this story hinted that the Skins might be looking at a FA pickup, rather than drafting their next QB.

I thought that too, but what FA out there would the Skins fans really be excited over outside of Peyton Manning?

Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 12:54 pm
by Deadskins
StorminMormon86 wrote:
Deadskins wrote:Unless they've already made a trade deal, but are waiting to announce it. But to your point, that's why I thought this story hinted that the Skins might be looking at a FA pickup, rather than drafting their next QB.

I thought that too, but what FA out there would the Skins fans really be excited over outside of Peyton Manning?

Flynn?

Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 11:40 pm
by tribeofjudah
I read somewhere???? The Pats could be our trading partner and we get RYAN MALLLET.....

What say you...???

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:27 am
by 1niksder
Washington Redskins coach Mike Shanahandoesn't seem overly concerned with Weeden's age, either.

“How often does a guy help you for more than six, seven, eight years?” Shanahan pointed out.

Coach of the South squad in Saturday's game, Shanahan answered questions about Weeden's 28-year-old maturity throughout the week. He was asked about the quarterback's age three times in a 20-minute press conference Wednesday night. No questions were asked about any other Senior Bowl quarterback during that interview session.


“His arm strength will be right with the best of them. He can probably pick it up and throw 70 yards down the field. He can make all the throws,” said Shanahan.



Redskins quarterbacks coach Matt LaFleur worked throughout the week with Weeden on his ball-handling, footwork and cadence. LaFleur liked what he saw, especially Weeden's ability to adjust to taking snaps under center.

“In college, they're always in shotgun. Here, 80 percent of our plays are from under center, but he was actually very natural at it,” said LaFleur. “I was very impressed with how fluid he is. And he can really throw it, one of the best I've been around.”



The Redskins don't have a Hall of Famer at quarterback currently, and Shanahan has drafted a 27-year-old rookie before in former Denver Broncos running back Mike Anderson.

“When it comes do a guy who played baseball (like Weeden), you just have to look at all scenarios,” Shanahan. “Does he have the passion? What type of athlete he is? What type of leader is he? You just have to project him to your scheme. It really comes down to if a guy can help your football team win. You have to evaluate it and obviously draft accordingly.

“That's why it's a great for a guy like me to be around a quarterback like this for a few days,” Shanahan added. “You get to see his passion, his accountability and how he relates to the other players.”

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 10:09 am
by jr_uscg
One of the guys at work swears Shanny is in love with Barkley and will wait for him. If he's right, we would need someone until then. Maybe Peyton until then?

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:27 pm
by SkinsJock
The Redskins will start the season with 3 QBs - a FA, a rookie and there's a good chance the 3rd will be Grossman


TOTALLY agree that the QB issues will be greatly helped with better weapons/players
The offense needs a lot of help - we need another great draft PLUS free agency to make that be more effective

HOWEVER - we STILL must bring in a new QB & we need someone we can get ready to be a future great (or at worst, good) NFL QB

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 4:40 pm
by riggofan
tribeofjudah wrote:I read somewhere???? The Pats could be our trading partner and we get RYAN MALLLET.....

What say you...???


I haven't heard that, but it has some possibilities. I don't think the Pats would hesitate to make a move like that. They have the 27th and 31/32 picks this year though. That's a big drop from #6. Maybe if they threw in a 2d or 3d rounder in the deal.

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:49 pm
by tribeofjudah
DarthMonk wrote:
Burgundy&Wha? wrote:From now on, let's call Rex Grossman RG3Int. So let it be written....


... so let it be done!

Image



AHHHH....Yul Brynner - what a stud....man crush...!!!

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 9:54 pm
by tribeofjudah
riggofan wrote:
tribeofjudah wrote:I read somewhere???? The Pats could be our trading partner and we get RYAN MALLLET.....

What say you...???


I haven't heard that, but it has some possibilities. I don't think the Pats would hesitate to make a move like that. They have the 27th and 31/32 picks this year though. That's a big drop from #6. Maybe if they threw in a 2d or 3d rounder in the deal.


Riggo, I read a fan says this on Redskins.com

Name withheld
theplaintruth
1:24 AM on January 26, 2012 | Likes: 0 | Replies (5)Replies (1) Replies (5)Replies (1) Please wait while we perform your request. Abuse Reported Report Abuse
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore theplaintruth. Show DetailsHide Details

This is what the Redskins will do in the draft, and you heard it here first because no one is even thinking it. Washington trades the 6th pick overall and the 38th pick overall to the Patriots. In return the Redskins recieve the Patriots 28th pick, their 31/32 pick, both of their late second round picks, and QB Ryan Mallet. Then the Reskins trade the higher second round pick (to Washington via Patriots via Raiders) back for a later 2nd and a late 3rd. This gives Washington two picks in each of the first four rounds, and a rookie QB with a year of Brady / Bellicheck grooming. Then they draft 1rst round OT and WR... 2nd round OG and ILB... 3rd round C and SS... 4th round FS and DE... 5th round TE... 6th round PK ...and 7th round FB. This is very doable. Patriots would love to have the 6th pick in each of the first two rounds.




http://www.redskins.com/news-and-events ... vv=discuss

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:11 pm
by frankcal20
tribeofjudah wrote:
riggofan wrote:
tribeofjudah wrote:I read somewhere???? The Pats could be our trading partner and we get RYAN MALLLET.....

What say you...???


I haven't heard that, but it has some possibilities. I don't think the Pats would hesitate to make a move like that. They have the 27th and 31/32 picks this year though. That's a big drop from #6. Maybe if they threw in a 2d or 3d rounder in the deal.


Riggo, I read a fan says this on Redskins.com

Name withheld
theplaintruth
1:24 AM on January 26, 2012 | Likes: 0 | Replies (5)Replies (1) Replies (5)Replies (1) Please wait while we perform your request. Abuse Reported Report Abuse
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore theplaintruth. Show DetailsHide Details

This is what the Redskins will do in the draft, and you heard it here first because no one is even thinking it. Washington trades the 6th pick overall and the 38th pick overall to the Patriots. In return the Redskins recieve the Patriots 28th pick, their 31/32 pick, both of their late second round picks, and QB Ryan Mallet. Then the Reskins trade the higher second round pick (to Washington via Patriots via Raiders) back for a later 2nd and a late 3rd. This gives Washington two picks in each of the first four rounds, and a rookie QB with a year of Brady / Bellicheck grooming. Then they draft 1rst round OT and WR... 2nd round OG and ILB... 3rd round C and SS... 4th round FS and DE... 5th round TE... 6th round PK ...and 7th round FB. This is very doable. Patriots would love to have the 6th pick in each of the first two rounds.




http://www.redskins.com/news-and-events ... vv=discuss



HUH?????

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2012 11:33 pm
by Paralis
Mallett's a non-starter. Tom Brady's turning 35 this year and the Pats need to start thinking about continuity. Specifically, if Mallett can step in and take over, they'd be insane to let him leave. So if he's available, it's because they think he can't get the job done (see: Brady Quinn leaving Cleveland).

Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:11 am
by cowboyhater4life
Paralis wrote:Mallett's a non-starter. Tom Brady's turning 35 this year and the Pats need to start thinking about continuity. Specifically, if Mallett can step in and take over, they'd be insane to let him leave. So if he's available, it's because they think he can't get the job done (see: Brady Quinn leaving Cleveland).



I agree. But it Would be nice to have Mallet :D

Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 3:39 pm
by riggofan
Paralis wrote:Mallett's a non-starter. Tom Brady's turning 35 this year and the Pats need to start thinking about continuity. Specifically, if Mallett can step in and take over, they'd be insane to let him leave. So if he's available, it's because they think he can't get the job done (see: Brady Quinn leaving Cleveland).


You might be right about their grooming a future QB. But I don't agree that a trade means Mallett sucks or whatever. They did trade Matt Cassel a couple years ago after a pretty solid year with the team.

Posted: Sun Jan 29, 2012 3:59 pm
by Paralis
They traded Cassell because they couldn't afford to keep him--his breakout year was also his contract year, and they traded him from under the franchise tag.

No financial decision has to be made on Mallett for at least two more years. If the Pats are willing to let him go for anything other than a huge offer, it's because he's not worth a roster spot.

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:14 pm
by StorminMormon86
Deadskins wrote:
StorminMormon86 wrote:
Deadskins wrote:Unless they've already made a trade deal, but are waiting to announce it. But to your point, that's why I thought this story hinted that the Skins might be looking at a FA pickup, rather than drafting their next QB.

I thought that too, but what FA out there would the Skins fans really be excited over outside of Peyton Manning?

Flynn?

Unlikely that the whole city would be excited for Flynn. There seems to be a considerable talk about Manning coming to DC now, who knows what's going on in the mind of Shanahan. Sometimes I question if even he does.

Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:20 pm
by langleyparkjoe
StorminMormon86 wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
StorminMormon86 wrote:
Deadskins wrote:Unless they've already made a trade deal, but are waiting to announce it. But to your point, that's why I thought this story hinted that the Skins might be looking at a FA pickup, rather than drafting their next QB.

I thought that too, but what FA out there would the Skins fans really be excited over outside of Peyton Manning?

Flynn?

Unlikely that the whole city would be excited for Flynn. There seems to be a considerable talk about Manning coming to DC now, who knows what's going on in the mind of Shanahan. Sometimes I question if even he does.


I don't want Flynn or Peyton.. just for the record.
Peyton- Neck
Flynn- One game means NOTHING